Wednesday, May 25, 2016

The “Legalization” of Murder in Canada

“The safety of the people shall be the highest law.”  Marcus Tullius Cicero

“Don’t be silly,” people will say. “Murder can never be legal.” “We have laws against it.” “It is a crime.” Not anymore, if this Bill to Kill is passed. The unelected Supreme Court has given an ultimatum to the elected government to bring in a “law” allowing murder.
The elected politicians and unelected senators stampeded to obey this immoral dictum and are presently worried how they can bring in this Bill to Kill by June 6, 2016, which is the date of the Supreme Court’s ultimatum.
Normal thinking people must be asking themselves: Have Our “Rulers” Gone Mad? [1]

“Some madness doesn't act mad to begin with, sometimes it will knock politely at the door, and when you let it in, it'll simply sit in the corner without a fuss - and grow.” - Nathan Filer

This madness to legalize killing is not only growing, it has also perverted the language in attempts to disguise the proposed acts of homicide. Words and phrases are used and written, and sugar coated to make all this palatable. Some examples are: “Doctor assisted dying, medically assisted suicide,” and other word manipulations. An ethical doctor had this to say about the Bill to Kill:

“It is not surprising that many Canadians are concerned about the dangers of the new assisted suicide and euthanasia bill, C-14. What is really not credible is how the word-benders who used the Charter "right to life" to legalize the intentional suicide or killing of some patients are now protesting that they have been cheated of total victory. While they were in court, they said that all they wanted was for competent consenting adults who were suffering terribly at the end of life to be able to have a doctor kill them, with no criminal consequences for anyone. Now they are hopping mad that non-adults and those who are mentally incompetent, those unable to consent, those whose suffering is purely psychological, and those with years to live just might be excluded. They don't have to worry. The same semantic ju-jitsu which delivered the Carter decision to them will have no problem convincing the courts to invite whoever else to the death party.” Dr. Will Johnston, 04/22/2016, Huffington Post.

I believe the jackboots of the judiciary are stomping on the rule of law in this country, and are now perverting the law. Furthermore, I believe the only way this country can be brought back to sanity is: The Not withstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be used to protect everybody from this abominable decision by unelected judges and their cringing political handmaidens. I also believe that these judges who have advocated the criminal act that some people can be killed, should be removed from the bench and criminally charged.  As should all the politicians, who are aiding and abetting them in sanctioning homicide. Otherwise, this judicial approved murder in Canada could be the death of a decent and civilized country. [2] Meanwhile most of the masses are silent and appear to be sedated into acceptance.

“They are sedating the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying” is the phrase used for killing
The people being terminated must be willing”... [3]

Stephen J. Gray
May 25, 2016.


Articles of interest below: