“The safety of the
people shall be the highest law.”
Marcus Tullius Cicero
“Don’t be silly,” people will say. “Murder can never be
legal.” “We have laws against it.” “It is a crime.” Not anymore, if this Bill to Kill is passed. The unelected Supreme Court has given an
ultimatum to the elected government
to bring in a “law” allowing murder.
The elected politicians and unelected senators stampeded to obey this immoral dictum and are
presently worried how they can bring in this Bill to Kill by June 6, 2016, which is the date of the Supreme
Court’s ultimatum.
Normal thinking people must be asking themselves: Have Our
“Rulers” Gone Mad? [1]
“Some madness doesn't
act mad to begin with, sometimes it will knock politely at the door, and when
you let it in, it'll simply sit in the corner without a fuss - and grow.” - Nathan
Filer
This madness to legalize killing is not only growing, it has
also perverted the language in attempts to disguise the proposed acts of
homicide. Words and phrases are used and written, and sugar coated to make all
this palatable. Some examples are: “Doctor assisted dying, medically assisted
suicide,” and other word manipulations. An ethical doctor had this to say about
the Bill to Kill:
“It is not surprising
that many Canadians are concerned about the dangers of the new assisted suicide
and euthanasia bill, C-14. What is really not credible is how the word-benders
who used the Charter "right to life" to legalize the intentional suicide
or killing of some patients are now protesting that they have been cheated of
total victory. While they were in court, they said that all they wanted was for
competent consenting adults who were suffering terribly at the end of life to
be able to have a doctor kill them, with no criminal consequences for anyone. Now
they are hopping mad that non-adults and those who are mentally incompetent,
those unable to consent, those whose suffering is purely psychological, and
those with years to live just might be excluded. They don't have to worry. The
same semantic ju-jitsu which delivered the Carter decision to them will have no
problem convincing the courts to invite whoever else to the death party.” Dr.
Will Johnston, 04/22/2016, Huffington
Post.
I believe the jackboots of the judiciary are stomping on the
rule of law in this country, and are now perverting the law. Furthermore, I
believe the only way this country can be brought back to sanity is: The Not
withstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be used to
protect everybody from this abominable decision by unelected judges and their cringing political handmaidens. I also
believe that these judges who have advocated the criminal act that some people
can be killed, should be removed from the bench and criminally charged. As should all the politicians, who are aiding
and abetting them in sanctioning homicide. Otherwise, this judicial approved
murder in Canada
could be the death of a decent and civilized country. [2] Meanwhile most of the masses are silent and appear to be
sedated into acceptance.
“They are sedating
the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged
and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying”
is the phrase used for killing
The people being
terminated must be willing”... [3]
Stephen J. Gray
May 25, 2016.
Endnotes:
Articles of interest
below:
