Sunday, March 16, 2014

The Imposition of The New World Order (NWO) and Global Governance

"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent."
Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, 1950

To achieve ‘world government’ money is needed and a monetary system has to be in place. This is already here. Most countries in the world have central banks who in turn report to the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). This could be called “The World Banking Politburo.” [1]
Central Bankers are the controllers and issuers of money.  Bankers dictate austerity programs through the auspices of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and governments of all countries whether capitalist, communist, conservative, liberal, socialist or despotic all are mostly under the monetary control of the central bankers. Bankers have proposed a single world monetary system.

The unelected central bankers are in attendance at G20 meetings as are representatives of governments and dictatorships.
 “The G20 represents about 85% of the world's economy.
It consists of the US, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, the UK, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, and the European Union.” [2] BBC News 21 February 2014.

The European Union was formed without a vote of all its peoples’ in different countries. National sovereignty has been surrendered to technocrats, bureaucrats, bankers and the unelected. The Euro Observer of December 9, 2011 stated: “…almost all fiscal policy-making would be taken out of the hands of national assemblies and delivered up to European civil servants.”  I believe the people are being betrayed by their puppet political “leaders.” Democracy has been ditched and political treason abounds. [3a] Referendums are refused and restrictions imposed. The monetary crisis has been collectivized and bankers sanitized. The people are ignored and austerity is the final solution of the banking elite. A smell of fascism is in the air and the perverted money system is in the hands of the money-changers who hold the power by appointment rather than by political approval by election or referendum. Democracy is dead in Europe slain by the banking elites. [3] Still, “global economic governance…” is on the agenda as witness the quote below:

“The Group of Twenty ("G-20") nations, the new Financial Stability Board ("FSB"), and the International Monetary Fund ("IMF") are progressing on two fronts: the monitoring and revision of national and regional economic plans to facilitate global economic governance…”

Lest we in North America think this cannot happen here, it already is. A North American Union is already in motion, though it is being called “Beyond Borders.” [4] Of course, the politicians tell us it’s all about creating jobs and security, (they always tell us that) and who could be against that, even if your national sovereignty is signed away? Let’s face it do we really believe the politicians dreamed up all these “deals” on their own? Are there powerful forces behind the scenes pushing the agenda and hiding out of sight? For instance, our own P.M Harper scurried over to Davos – where the elites meet – to announce changes to Old Age Security (OAS). One would have thought he would have done this in Parliament first? But, no he did not. Surely, the globalist elites of the world [5] are not pulling his strings? Still Mr. Harper is on record as saying:

“We need some semblance of global governance” [6]

When did Canadians agree to ‘global governance?’ Was it on the ballot in the last election? Is Stephen Harper, who was running around electioneering during the last election - sometimes wearing a jacket with Canada emblazoned all over it – really hiding his true intentions and globalist leanings?  Was he just seeking votes? Does he have a hidden agenda to give away Canada’s national sovereignty?  Is he being influenced by powerful people or by people in other countries who are also undermining their own countries sovereignty? (Europe is one example where puppet politicians have signed away national sovereignty and unelected “technocrats” have taken over) Surely, if Mr. Harper cared about Canada and Canadians he would not have said the words below?

“I know some people don’t like it, it’s a loss of national sovereignty” Stephen Harper [6]

One wonders, how do the people in his Tory party feel about the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Do they care? Or do they follow Mr. Harper blindly? Are the speech writers and political flacks who surround Mr. Harper are they okay with the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Does the perks of the job mean more than loyalty to ones country? Do the MPs who serve under Mr. Harper and the opposition MPs have any thoughts on Canada’s ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Do these MPs care about Canada’s ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Have any of them spoken out in defence of Canada?

What about the Canadian media? Have any of them raised the alarm on the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Has it been front page news in any of the corporate owned newspapers? Have any of the corporate owned TV stations who are always boasting that they bring the news to the people: Have any of them done an in depth investigation of the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ What about the big business elites, do they care about the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Does money and profits count more than allegiance to Canada?

I believe ordinary people around the world are being deceived by their leaders. A globalist elite [5] appear to be in control. And this is easily done through controlling the money system. Therefore, the NWO and global governance can be imposed.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
Carroll Quigley, Author  “Tragedy and Hope.”

Stephen J. Gray
March 16, 2014.


Articles of interest at links below:

Power, Strategy and Players of World Government by Joan Veon