The “rock star” Banker

The headlines said a “rock star” banker was leaving

The media went into a frenzy the country was supposedly grieving

Oh, who will save us now, was the noisy media cry

Their “rock star” banker would soon be saying goodbye

He was going to jolly old Blighty, to save it from its troubles

Even though some say it was bankers that caused the financial bubble

But hey, the banking “rock star” will surely be a wow

But what will happen to his old bank, can anyone help them now?

There is always help available, another money printer will arrive

And when the “rock star” leaves: the bank will still survive

Bankers do not suffer austerity or any wear and tear

As long as there are servile taxpayers here and everywhere

The taxpayers bailed out the manipulative Libor-raters

Now they are preaching austerity these financial operators

But don’t worry, a banking “rock star” will take control

As people everywhere sink deeper into a big financial hole

Still, lighten up all you worried serfs as you lose your “best and brightest”

There is always another banking “rock star” amongst Goldman’s finest

Bankers rule this world of ours, that’s why we are all in debt

The money printers are in charge, do we really have a “rock star” asset?

Stephen J. Gray

November 28,2012.

Articles of interest:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/goldman-sachs-completes-economic-takeover-of-europe.html

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/meet-35-foreign-banks-got-bailed-out-fed-and-just-cpff-banks

http://mises.ca/posts/blog/the-canadian-bank-bailout/

Is Society Terrified of the Truth?

“A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” -John F. Kennedy

The truth of the humanity of the pre-born child in Canada continues to be undermined, suppressed and twisted by so-called educated and intelligent people. An article by Charlie Gillis of MacLeans of November 14, 2012 stated,

“The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada is seldom at a loss for words. But even Beverley McLachlin stopped in her verbal tracks last month while hearing arguments in the matter of Regina v. Ivana Levkovic….Levkovic, a former stripper from Mississauga, Ont., was accused of leaving the body of her newborn daughter on her apartment balcony, to be found—badly decomposed in a plastic bag—by her landlord when she vacated.” [1]

According to the article, the judges hearing the case were having difficulty finding the “right words” to describe the little human victim. The article goes on to say this about the judicial language:

“Thus began a kind of linguistic minuet, as the judges reached for acceptable nomenclature for a hypothetical baby that the law might not regard as a person. McLachlin tried ‘object’ and ‘being’ and, at one cringeworthy point, referred to it as ‘this, um, dead, um, whatever.’ Her colleagues didn’t fare much better. During a discussion of the applicability of mens rea, Justice Michael Moldaver, a former criminal lawyer who joined the court one year ago, referred to the infant in such cases as ‘the thing.’”[1]

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” -George Orwell

This is where the disrespect for human life has led us. A human life is described as ‘the thing.’ Still, one should not be surprised at the weasel words being used by judges and others to describe an innocent little human life. The truth in Canada has to be sanitized and camouflaged to protect those in power from even admitting that we kill over 100,000 human lives yearly by abortion. Therefore, we call this atrocity “choice.”  In the case described above I believe the “finest legal minds” are engaged in a form of word corruption in order to hide the truth of what we are doing to human life in this lawless land. (Canada has no law on abortion)

“Where the speech is corrupted, the mind is also.” –Seneca

Still, one must not be too hard on the word corrupting judiciary when even politicians themselves want to remain ignorant about human life. M.P. Stephen Woodworth’s Motion 312 on finding out when human life begins was opposed by 203 MPs.  Surely it was a day of disgrace for Canada and an insult to humanity.

Even the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) was against Motion 312, despite the fact that reputable medical texts and scientific journals tell us that life begins at fertilization.

We live in a lawless and truth-corrupting land that fails in its duty to protect human life, but instead attempts to hide the truth by perverting the language. We are a country in disgraceful denial when a majority of politicians, the so-called “lawmakers,” vote to remain ignorant of when human life begins. We are a country in denial when judges describe human life as a “thing” or an “object.” We are a country in denial when most of the media cover up the atrocities committed on innocent human life by abortionists. We are a country in denial when the language becomes debased and twisted in order to protect the big lie that killing by “choice” is “respectable.”

“If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.” -Josef Goebbels

Stephen J. Gray

November 26,2012.

 Endnote:

[1] http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/the-right-words/

See the slaughtered victims of “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

The Political Race

The serfs turned out in faithful numbers to make a selection in the two-horse political race.  The horses colours were blue and red and both were from similar political stables, albeit they had different names. Blue Horse was from the Dumbocrat’s stable and the Red Horse was from the Republicrat’s stable. Both horses were well fed and watered and were the “best” in the country and produced the finest manure in the land. They were favourites of the financiers and many of the people. The people gambled by placing an X for the horse of their choice, not knowing (or ignorant of the fact) that whoever won they themselves would be the losers. This would be the price they would pay for gambling on a “democracy.”  The winner of the race had a licence to punish, and punishment would be the prize for the people.

Both political jockeys were old political pros and knew the political racetrack well.  One media tipster was heard to say this race was a “political superbowl,” though most of the serfs would be in the toilet bowl after it was all over, if the horses ran true to form. Whichever jockey won the race would have as a prize a Big House as a residence for four years, and would be able to lord it over the gullible masses that cheered his victory. It was reported that billions of dollars were gambled on this political race. But, the really big winners would be the establishment elites who had trained and financed the winner and the loser.

Still, the serfs had a good time at the political race and some even chanted “four more years,” even though around 47 million of them were on food stamps, their jobs gone and their houses re-possessed by bailed out bankers. Unemployment was at a record high and the winner would be cheered mightily as he promised them more of the same. This was called “more change and hope to believe in” or “forward” to the “fiscal cliff.” The race was billed by the propagandists as “democracy in action” and the people lined up for hours to place their bets on the Blue or Red colours ridden by jockeys from the same mentality stable.

This was an event that proved no matter how incompetent the jockeys were or how the political race finished, the compliant serfs would cheer the winner, happy in their own stupidity. Some cynics said the race was fixed, but how could a race be fixed when both jockeys and horses were owned by the establishment? One media pundit did call the losing stable “yahoos” but he was perhaps ignorant of the fact that whoever won, the “yahoos” would rule.

Now the race was over and a yahoo won for the “yahoos” and the Big House was his for four more years. “Yahoo, yahoo,” screamed the serf victors in celebration as they waved their flags in honour of their own slavery. Then they went home to their food stamp existence, their high unemployment, their mortgaged-to-the-hilt homes (those that had homes), their National Dictator’s Authoritarian Act (NDAA) where they could be arrested or killed without due process, the killing of their young by state sanctioned abortion, endless wars, and a descent into totalitarianism and moral degeneracy. But the serfs thought they were “free.” Surely that is all that counts. Long live “democracy!”

Stephen J. Gray

November 13, 2012.

 Articles of interest below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg69QM1yXQQ

http://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/ndaa

http://lewrockwell.com/whitehead/whitehead62.1.html

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/reawakening-liberty/2012/nov/2/support-kill-list-and-ndaa-make-obama-and-romney-u/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/12/Gov-t-Withheld-Record-47-1-Million-Food-Stamp-Report  

The Animal Parliament: An Animal Fairy Tale

It was parliamentary Motion day in the Animal Parliament and all the animals were eager to get started. Especially as they were all being filmed for Animal T.V. (ATV) They all preened and clucked, some barked, others chirped at each other and a pit bull snarled at those who mocked it. Eventually they were all called to animal order by the speaker who was one of the most respected animals: a barnyard parrot.

 “The first animal motion to be voted on in our order paper today is: ‘When does animal life begin, Motion 123’ and should we discuss this important issue?” squawked the Parrot speaker as it shook its plumage and opened its beak in a birdlike smile. “But before we start on this important vote: are their any statements of animal wisdom?”  Immediately, there was a flurry of barking, clacking, whining, screaming, braying and other assorted noise from the various animals that had words of animal wisdom to impart.  “I see,” said the speaker, “we have a number of animals who wish to give us some beastly wisdom; therefore, the most important beasts will be first to speak, starting with the Most Honourable Portly Pig.”  “Respected Speaker,” said Portly Pig, “I believe it is very unfortunate that this motion has even been allowed to be on the order paper. I am also very upset that this motion comes from one of my party members of the Conservative Animal Party (CAP). I will try to get my animal members to vote against it.” With that Portly Pig sat down on his plump posterior on the barn floor, which functioned as the Animal Parliament’s place of respect.

Next animal up was the Honourable Noisy Pit Bull, it stood up on its hind legs and snarled and barked in dog language. “What the heck is going on, I don’t need to know when animal life begins, that’s why we are all stupid animals.” Most of the animals whined, screamed, clacked and clucked appreciation on hearing this wisdom from Noisy Pit Bull and one even attempted to nuzzle the dog. Others attempted some animal applause by banging their tails on the barn floor. Order, order squawked the speaker who was a Parrot of respected lineage and even knew some human words.

Next up was the Most Honourable Socialist Monkey of the Socialist Animal Party (SAP). “Why are we even discussing this animal nonsense chattered the Socialist Monkey? This kind of proposed discussion is an insult to female animals of all kinds and could intimidate them from having free choice in Animal Land. This is a plot of the CAP to undermine Reproductive Animal Rights.”

“Well said,” screeched Glibby the Goose a notable member of the SAP. “Order, order, order,” screeched the Parrot Speaker from its perch on top of the barn door.

Next up was Most Honourable Slippery Snake of the Liberal Animal Party (LAP). A well respected slippery creature which moved easily from one party to another. “This matter has already been decided” said Slippery Snake.  “Reproductivity is a private matter and we must not violate privacy by attaining information that might cause us to think.” And with that the snake slithered back to its favourite hole in the barn.

“It is now time for the vote. ‘On when Animal Life Begins, Motion 123’” said the Parrot Speaker.

The Vote then went ahead and after a short time the Parrot announced the results.

“This Animal Parliament has decided against finding out when animal life begins. We are just ignorant and stupid animals and we do not need to know about our life beginnings. It is better than we remain dense, silly and unaware and go about our daily business in the parliamentary barnyard as ignorant animals. We are only beasts, secure in our stinking existence amongst the manure we produce. Therefore, this Animal Parliament has spoken and its animal brains cannot be filled with information that might make us think and reason and bring in laws. Animal Parliament is now adjourned for today.”

On hearing this animal wisdom from the Parrot speaker, the Animal Parliament erupted in a noisy self congratulation of screaming, barking, hissing, whining, cackling and braying. And the animal members of the CAP, LAP and SAP parties all congratulated each other on being honourable animals of distinction in the Animal Parliament.

Stephen J. Gray

November 1, 2012.