“Former attorney
general Jody Wilson-Raybould said Friday she would not comment on claims
that the Prime Minister's Office tried to pressure her to help SNC-Lavalin
avoid criminal prosecution in pending legal action against the
construction company....
“SNC-Lavalin has been
charged with fraud and corruption in connection with payments of nearly $48
million to public officials in Libya
under Moammar Gadhafi's government, and allegations it defrauded Libyan
organizations of an estimated $130 million...”
John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08,
2019 10:33 AM ET | Last Updated: February 8
“While the US Congress questions the legitimacy of the war
on Libya, the Canadian
parliament with one dissenting voice, votes in favor of extending Canada’s
participation in an illegal and criminal military undertaking:” Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research,
June 16, 2011
“The destruction of Libya by NATO at the behest of the UK, the US
and France
was a crime, one dripping in the cant and hypocrisy of Western ideologues...”
John Wight, November 27, 2017.
Canada’s
“Charter” I believe would be helpful in the SNC - Lavalin controversy, even
though the Liberal government reportedly did this:
“Buried deep in the
2018 omnibus budget bill was a provision allowing corporations charged with
certain offences to avoid prosecution by signing so-called ‘remediation
agreements.’ In place of convictions, fines and jail times...” Andrew
Coyne, Feb 8, 2019. National Post
While the above quote sounds helpful, I believe a few words
from a respected judge or judges might carry more weight, especially if it was
vocalized as a Charter “right.” There are cases where a respected judge has “read in” words to suit the case. So
why not do it in the SNC Lavalin case? That would show some judicial
“consistency.”
Here are some examples below of other cases:
The judges say The Charter is a “living tree”
Then from the “living tree” come the great new “rights”
found in the charter.
An abortionist who consistently broke the law was finally given clearance to
ply his abominable trade of killing the child in the womb, after a majority of
judges struck down the abortion law. Now the country has no law on abortion and
the killing of the innocents is declared a “choice.”
Another judge declares that anyone arriving on the shores of the country, be
they criminals, terrorists, drug dealers or whatever, have “rights” under the Charter.
Another judge states that criminals are “morally worthy” to vote.
Another “learned” judge has a hallucination and “reads in”
words not written in the Charter....
There is already evidence of crimes being ignored in Canada:
Who would have
believed that in the supposedly civilized country of Canada, 491 babies that were born
alive after failed killings by abortion were then left to die, or that this
atrocity would not even be investigated? Or that those in positions of power,
namely the justice system, the leader of the federal government and most of the
politicians of all the political parties would remain silent on this appalling
heinous criminality?...
The most recent
atrocities committed in Canada’s
charnel houses were the 491 babies born alive after abortions failed to kill
them but then were left to die. Three courageous conservative MPs wrote a
letter to the head of the RCMP which stated: “Dear Commissioner Paulson,
Recent public reports
have revealed the possibility of numerous breaches of the Criminal Code - to be
specific, homicides - in Canada
which need to be investigated. These killings appear to have started out as
attempted abortions, but the babies were born alive.”...
Note: The Letter to
the RCMP can be seen in link below.
The truth of the humanity of the pre-born child in Canada
continues to be undermined, suppressed and twisted by so-called educated and
intelligent people....
There are a number of examples where “The rule of law” and
“justice” in Canada
appears to be going, dare one say it, “potty” and speaking the truth becomes a charade.
“A country the gods
wish to destroy, they first make mad.”
But, Canada
is just going to Pot.
It has been reported in various media that a judge had given
permission for a man to be killed where “The court ...ruled the coroner did not
need to be notified given that the cause of death was deemed to be his disease,
not the lethal drugs he was given”.
One wonders is this not a case of falsifying medical documents?...
All the evidence above and at links below, is why I believe
SNC - Lavalin, could be helped by a “Charter ruling” from respected judges?!
Because, we are, I believe: “The Country Where Anything Goes.”
Stephen J. Gray
February 17, 2019.
Links of interest
below:
