“What is needed is
the constitutional wisdom that led to including the notwithstanding clause in
the Charter -- sufficient respect for parliamentary democracy not to let the
judiciary always have the last word on rights and freedoms.” – Peter
Russell, National Post, February 13, 2007.
The not-withstanding clause was inserted into the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms as a safeguard, against judges running amok. I believe it
is now imperative that it be used to protect not only the vulnerable in this
country, but everybody. This “legalized” killing decision by the Supreme Court
of Canada is surely a brazen attack on human life and unworthy of being called
“justice at work.” If nine judges can impose a decision that gives
license to killing, then surely we have reached the depths of depravity. This
is not the rule of law; this is the rule of the licentious. [1]
I believe the jackboots of the judiciary are stomping on the
rule of law in this country, and are now perverting the law. Furthermore, I
believe the way this country can be brought back to sanity is this: The Not
withstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be used to
protect everybody from this abominable decision by unelected judges and their cringing political handmaidens. I
also believe that these judges who have advocated the criminal act that some
people can be killed, should be removed from the bench and criminally charged,
as should all the politicians, who are aiding and abetting them in sanctioning
homicide. [2]
One would think that civilized people in a supposedly
civilized country would be filled with revulsion and outrage that the laws of
their land would be perverted to allow “legalized” murder. Have their
consciences been killed and their brains befuddled?
To make this “kindly killing” acceptable, the criminal acts
of killing human beings is being covered up with language like “medical
assistance in dying,” or “physician-hastened death,” and other “nice” phrases
and words used to disguise the truth, which is this: people are going to be
killed by giving consent to those in the “medical profession” who are supposed
to “Do no harm.” And the criminal code will be subverted to “create
exemptions” for their killers.
“This enactment
amends the Criminal Code to, among other things,
(a)create from the
offences of culpable homicide, of aiding suicide exemptions and of
administering a noxious thing, in order to permit medical practitioners and
nurse practitioners to provide medical assistance in dying and to permit
pharmacists and other persons to assist in the process;”
Killing people is now called “the process” and Bill C-14,
the Bill to Kill, I
believe is a sick commentary on the depths of depravity and madness a once
civilized country has sunk. Who in their “right mind” could even put this
obscenity into “legal” writing is beyond my comprehension. [3] Are the people of this country
being “legally” hypnotized or sedated? [4]
“They are sedating
the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged
and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying”
is the phrase used for killing
The people being
terminated must be willing” [4]
I believe the laws of Canada have been subverted by those
who are supposed to uphold the law. Nine unelected judges of the Supreme Court of Canada have declared
persons can be killed. They gave the elected government
a time frame to bring in this perversion of justice. There are cases on record
of people being charged with murder for killing the disabled and sentenced to
prison in Canada. [5] This has been reported in the
media. Yet those in the media today are mostly all on board this judicial
ship of death by making these proposed state sanctioned killings sound
“compassionate” and “lawful.” To see some of them on television spouting
propaganda and hogwash and interviewing supporters of killing, while having
nobody else with an opposing viewpoint, is, I believe, to see evil at
work. Therefore, I ask is, “the Canadian news media” biased?
“The bias of the
Canadian news media not only trivializes the murder of one child with a
disability, it also accelerates the forces that ensure future violence and more
deaths.... The Latimer case and its portrayal in the media raise doubts that
assisted suicide can ever be allowed without condemning some people with
disabilities to an unrequested death.”
Prof. Dick
Sobsey, University of
Alberta Abuse and
Disability Project
“As two individuals
living with severe disabilities due to spinal muscular atrophy, the
government's Bill C-14 Medical Assistance in Dying has left us apprehensive and
concerned both for ourselves and for our fellow Canadians living with disabilities.”
Pieter Harsevoort and
James Schutten. May 24, 2016, Hamilton
Spectator
In closing, I believe it is imperative that this proposed
killing be stopped, its planners and promoters arrested, and the Notwithstanding
Clause used.
Stephen J. Gray
June 7, 2016.
Endnotes:
Articles of interest
below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“The Deadly Problems
Surrounding Bill C-14”
Family Physician in Vancouver
BC
“It is not surprising
that many Canadians are concerned about the dangers of the new assisted suicide
and euthanasia bill, C-14. What is really not credible is how the word-benders
who used the Charter "right to life" to legalize the intentional
suicide or killing of some patients are now protesting that they have been
cheated of total victory. While they were in court, they said that all they
wanted was for competent consenting adults who were suffering terribly at the
end of life to be able to have a doctor kill them, with no criminal
consequences for anyone. Now they are hopping mad that non-adults and those who
are mentally incompetent, those unable to consent, those whose suffering is
purely psychological, and those with years to live just might be excluded. They
don't have to worry. The same semantic ju-jitsu which delivered the Carter
decision to them will have no problem convincing the courts to invite whoever
else to the death party.” Dr. Will Johnston, 04/22/2016, Huffington Post.
...
[Read full article at
link below]
