Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Canada’s “Kind” and “Gentle” Killers

The Supreme Court of “law and justice” issued an ultimatum
To the “government” of the land “very nicely,” but verbatim
They must bring in a Bill to Kill by June 6, 2016
Now the politicians have a Bill, that’s called Bill C-14

Still, the politicians are very worried that they might not make their date
To have killing properly accepted for those who want their final fate
The “kind” and “gentle” killers are nicely dressed to kill
They operate from the country’s parliament, the “honourable” House on the Hill

They pay homage to the unelected judges, of a court “supreme”
There is surely something wrong, when justice becomes obscene?
Is this a land that has lost its “moral compass” and on a road to hell?
Will “legalized killing” become a “right” for everybody else as well?

The media are really “helpful” in describing the proposed “assisted deaths”
The killings are described “compassionately” with every media breath
Still, propaganda is needed when the aim is to “legally” kill
Are the media the “kind helpers” of the killers on the hill?

One must not forget that the medical establishment are on board too
Are they captains of the ships of death coming soon to all of you?
There has to be “medical solidarity” if this death ship reaches port
So that is why the “caregivers of health” are giving their support

Have those who should know better completely lost their minds?
Is “assisted” murder of helpless people a danger to all of humankind?
Once this “final solution” is accepted, to bring life to a close
Will people finally realize too late, their “emperors’ have no clothes”?

Ask not for “whom the bell tolls” because it could toll for thee
Across this once “civilized land” from “sea to shining sea”
In an honest justice system “legalized killing” would be forbidden
And those proposing these abominable acts would be rightfully in prison

“Assisted” murder is coming to Canada all dressed up as “compassion”
The criminal code will be altered in a corrupt and “legal” fashion
The rule of law will be perverted no longer will it be an upright pillar
And the end result will be: Canada has “Kind” and “Gentle” Killers

Stephen J. Gray
May 31, 2016

Info of interest below:

“This enactment amends the Criminal Code to, among other things,
(a)create exemptions  from the offences of culpable homicide, of aiding suicide and of administering a noxious thing, in order to permit medical practitioners and nurse practitioners to provide medical assistance in dying and to permit pharmacists and other persons to assist in the process;”

Monday, May 30, 2016

Are There Lunatics Loose?

Are there lunatics loose in the house on the hill?
They are going to approve a Bill to Kill
This will become the “law” of the land
Does power and madness go hand in hand?

The legislators took their orders from unelected judges
Then hurried and scurried to make obscene pledges
They would enforce them with all of the their might
To make “legalized killing” declared a “right”

The “right to life” is engraved in the land’s Charter
There is no right to kill, does that really matter?
Whatever unelected judges say is accepted as “precision”
They can twist words and language, to make a “landmark decision”

Is this a land of dangerous nonsense proscribed into “law”?
Should these appointed judges be held in awe?
They can say and imagine anything they want to see
And that is how The Charter became a “living tree”

They can also “read in” words not in the Charter
Do the masses not understand, judges are “smarter”?
Do they have politicians and others legally seduced?
Are there lunatics on the hill, and running loose?

Stephen J. Gray
May 30, 2016.

Links of interest below:

May 28, 2016
Where is the Revulsion and the Outrage?

Saturday, May 28, 2016

Where is the Revulsion and the Outrage?

One would think that civilized people in a supposedly civilized country would be filled with revulsion and outrage that the laws of their land would be perverted to allow “legalized” murder. [1] Have their consciences been killed and their brains befuddled?

Are they too busy watching hockey, basketball, baseball, soccer and other assorted games to realise that they are silent spectators in a game of death organized by the highest court in their land? The appointed, unelected, Supreme Court of Canada has ordered their elected representatives to bring in a Bill by June 6, 2016, to ensure that people who wish to be killed (or “assisted” in “dying”) can get their death wish fulfilled. The government and opposition members, including unelected Senators, are hurrying to get Bill C-14, also known as the Bill to Kill, passed into “law.”

To make this “kindly killing” acceptable, the criminal acts of killing human beings is being called “medical assistance in dying,” or “assisted suicide,” or “physician-hastened death,” and other “nice” phrases and words used to disguise the truth, which is this: people are going to be killed by giving consent to those in the “medical profession” who are supposed to “Do no harm.”  And the criminal code will be subverted to “create exemptions” for their killers.

“This enactment amends the Criminal Code to, among other things,
 (a)create exemptions from the offences of culpable homicide, of aiding suicide and of administering a noxious thing, in order to permit medical practitioners and nurse practitioners to provide medical assistance in dying and to permit pharmacists and other persons to assist in the process;”

Killing people is now called “the process” and Bill C-14, the Bill to Kill, I believe is a sick commentary on the depths of depravity and madness a once civilized country has sunk. Who in their “right mind” could even put this obscenity into “legal” writing is beyond my comprehension. I can only ask, Have “Our Rulers” Gone Mad? [2]

Have the “finest legal minds” and the “intelligentsia” in this once civilized country thought this through? I believe there will be fallout and repercussions from this perversion of law, language, and justice. There could be a plethora of court cases and lawsuits.  People could be killed by “accident,” or “mistakenly” terminated. People could be killed for their property, organs, money, inheritances, life insurance benefits etc. Will some “bad” convicted killers claim there is a double standard, claiming the state is allowed to kill “compassionately” but when they kill in anger or plan a homicide, they are jailed? Will we have “good killings” and bad killings? The crazy horror show that will result from this judicial, political, and medical insanity is waiting to happen!  The lawyer class will have a monetary field day thanks to the lawyers that now are appointed judges on the Obscene Court, oops, I mean the Supreme Court. All this could be called: “The Marketing of Murder in Canada, [3] or in the grip of “The Charter Disease.” [4]
Meanwhile, as I mentioned earlier, many people in the country appear to be blissfully unaware of the danger and seriousness of this situation. Once “legalized” killing starts, death’s door will have been “legally” opened, and the death merchants will arrive. I believe nobody will be safe.

“As two individuals living with severe disabilities due to spinal muscular atrophy, the government's Bill C-14 Medical Assistance in Dying has left us apprehensive and concerned both for ourselves and for our fellow Canadians living with disabilities.”
Pieter Harsevoort and James Schutten. May 24, 2016, Hamilton Spectator

Another country many years ago went down this road of state-sanctioned euthanasia, and “persecution of the disabled.” We should know the history of that. [5] [5a] Could history repeat itself in Canada? Are the masses so entertained and sedated [6] that they are unable to express any revulsion or outrage at what is happening in broad daylight to this country by those in positions of power who are peddling and supporting “assisted” killing as the “final solution” for those who are helpless and suffering?

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,"
George Santayana

Stephen J. Gray
May 28, 2016.


Links of interest below:

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

The “Legalization” of Murder in Canada

“The safety of the people shall be the highest law.”  Marcus Tullius Cicero

“Don’t be silly,” people will say. “Murder can never be legal.” “We have laws against it.” “It is a crime.” Not anymore, if this Bill to Kill is passed. The unelected Supreme Court has given an ultimatum to the elected government to bring in a “law” allowing murder.
The elected politicians and unelected senators stampeded to obey this immoral dictum and are presently worried how they can bring in this Bill to Kill by June 6, 2016, which is the date of the Supreme Court’s ultimatum.
Normal thinking people must be asking themselves: Have Our “Rulers” Gone Mad? [1]

“Some madness doesn't act mad to begin with, sometimes it will knock politely at the door, and when you let it in, it'll simply sit in the corner without a fuss - and grow.” - Nathan Filer

This madness to legalize killing is not only growing, it has also perverted the language in attempts to disguise the proposed acts of homicide. Words and phrases are used and written, and sugar coated to make all this palatable. Some examples are: “Doctor assisted dying, medically assisted suicide,” and other word manipulations. An ethical doctor had this to say about the Bill to Kill:

“It is not surprising that many Canadians are concerned about the dangers of the new assisted suicide and euthanasia bill, C-14. What is really not credible is how the word-benders who used the Charter "right to life" to legalize the intentional suicide or killing of some patients are now protesting that they have been cheated of total victory. While they were in court, they said that all they wanted was for competent consenting adults who were suffering terribly at the end of life to be able to have a doctor kill them, with no criminal consequences for anyone. Now they are hopping mad that non-adults and those who are mentally incompetent, those unable to consent, those whose suffering is purely psychological, and those with years to live just might be excluded. They don't have to worry. The same semantic ju-jitsu which delivered the Carter decision to them will have no problem convincing the courts to invite whoever else to the death party.” Dr. Will Johnston, 04/22/2016, Huffington Post.

I believe the jackboots of the judiciary are stomping on the rule of law in this country, and are now perverting the law. Furthermore, I believe the only way this country can be brought back to sanity is: The Not withstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be used to protect everybody from this abominable decision by unelected judges and their cringing political handmaidens. I also believe that these judges who have advocated the criminal act that some people can be killed, should be removed from the bench and criminally charged.  As should all the politicians, who are aiding and abetting them in sanctioning homicide. Otherwise, this judicial approved murder in Canada could be the death of a decent and civilized country. [2] Meanwhile most of the masses are silent and appear to be sedated into acceptance.

“They are sedating the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying” is the phrase used for killing
The people being terminated must be willing”... [3]

Stephen J. Gray
May 25, 2016.


Articles of interest below:

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Marching To Doomsday

"I have made the most wonderful discovery, I have discovered men will risk their lives, even die, for ribbons" -Napoleon Bonaparte

Marching towards Doomsday in bemedaled uniforms
Are they the NATO-rious war mongers that should be scorned?
Instead they parade and feed off peoples taxes
Bringing death and destruction to many countries masses

Many people follow and obey the dictators of war
Helping them to facilitate endless blood and gore
Hell on earth rains down from the starry heavens
Napoleon says: “men will... even die, for ribbons"

War and more war is their crazy reason for being
Are maniacs of militarism, what we are seeing?
War criminals and political gangs, that are a curse on the world
Evil personified with their war marketing banners unfurled

Maniacal “leaders” of mayhem, who meet in luxury surroundings
Proud of their actions to set countries burning
Creators of refugees and endless bloody wars
They are the war gangsters that should be abhorred

Instead they are praised by politicians “in charge”
These scurrilous “humans” presently at large
Will nobody arrest them, and put them on trial?
These perverts for war are really hostile and vile

If they are not restrained and put in chains
These caricatures of “humanity” will bring the end game
Planners and plotters of killing, and of murder
Organizers of evil tearing the earth asunder

Invaders of countries that never invaded them
These are the war criminals; are they totally insane?
Could the final acts of these madmen be coming our way?
Will nuclear war be the end of, The March to Doomsday?

“War is madness” - Pope Francis

Stephen J. Gray
May 22, 2016.

Info of interest at links below:
“General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years”

“France's Former Foreign Minister: UK Government Prepared War in Syria Two Years Before 2011 Protests”

Thursday, May 19, 2016

“Sunny Ways” Becomes Nasty Ways in Nonsenseland

Nonsenseland’s parliament, the House of “right honourable’ and “honourable” persons, erupted into a bedlam of fury, shouts, threats, reported assault, obscene language and other disgraceful behaviour unbecoming of this land of “democracy.”
It seems the Leader of the land was about to limit debate on the “Assisted Suicide Bill,” or to phrase it truthfully, the Bill to Kill.  This caused outrage amongst the opposition.

Then the Land’s right honourable leader strode arrogantly and purposefully across the floor of the House and reportedly “manhandled” another honourable member. One female member claimed she was assaulted in the chest by the leader’s elbow, surely a sad and sorry state of affairs perpetrated by a “sunny ways” gentleman who claims to be a “feminist.” Another member was reportedly told to get the f*** out of the way. It appeared this Bill to Kill was causing the rise of unpleasant feelings amongst the “honourable” members. But hey, contemplating killing should be unpleasant.

Here they were discussing the killing of helpless people, and the leader of the land was trying to limit debate. What was his hurry? Most of the “honourable” members were all in favour of the Bill to Kill, could he not let them have a little bit of limelight on the House floor? After all, they all like to speak supportive political platitudes on this Bill to Kill, and some even want the Bill on Killing to be expanded to allow others to be “kindly dispatched.”

Still, there was a Supreme Court deadline (no pun intended) to be reached, and perhaps that was why the Land’s leader was in a hurry to get all this death dealing over with. After all, there are people waiting to be killed “compassionately,” so perhaps an excuse can be made for the “sunny ways” of the leader turning nasty, because he was worried about the judicial deadline (again no pun intended).

Therefore, before all this blame is heaped upon the Leader of Nonsenseland becoming nasty, why don’t we put some blame on the appointed unelected judges where it all began. They were the ones who gave the elected government of Nonsenseland a deadline to bring in killing. They are the ones who perverted the land’s Charter that has a “right to life.” Nowhere does it have a “right to kill.” They invented a “right” to kill and now the leader of the land has lost his head in anger, perhaps under pressure from the court’s deadline.  His “sunny ways” has turned into nasty ways. If he and all the other MPs had the courage to use the Not-Withstanding Clause in the Charter they could prevent this abomination by dictatorial judges. But, courage appears to be lacking. Therefore, is all this nonsense an example of the want of ethics, morality and principles in Nonsenseland’s parliament?

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

Stephen J. Gray
May 19, 2016.

Articles of interest at links below:

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Sedating the Masses

They are sedating the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying” is the phrase used for killing
The people being terminated must be willing

A “law” is being passed and “justice” will be meted out
The politicians will praise their own “ethics,” no doubt
The Bill that they pass in the House on the Hill
Will be hailed as “compassionate” and given a “right” to kill

Is this what happens when “rulers” go mad?
And they cannot see that “ethical” murder is bad
Could the “health” system become unhealthy and more
Will doctors be licensed to open death’s door?

Is history repeating itself once again?
Will state-sanctioned killing start to reign?
Will it gradually creep into every day living?
Will it even encompass some who are unwilling?

Once “legalized” murder becomes acceptable
Will there be no holding back the disreputable?
Are the death warrants signed and judicially approved?
Is the day coming when anyone can be “removed”?

Still, this is a land of the “Charter” and “sunny ways”
Where people will be “assisted” to end their days
A caring and humanitarian land with a “right to kill”
Where the always available taxpayer will foot the bill

Accessories to murder, after the fact
Paying for unfortunate people to get whacked
Still, there are those who support this I suppose!
Don’t they realize, “our emperors have no clothes”?

As long as it is sold and marketed as compassion
Perverting words and language could be in fashion
Are “mad rulers” wearing “rose tinted glasses”?
Does it all come down to sedating the masses?

Stephen J. Gray
May 18, 2016.

Articles of interest at link below:
Euthanasia in Nazi Germany - The T4 Programme
In his "Medical Science under Dictatorship", published in the New England Journal of Medicine, July, 1949, Dr Alexander observed:

"Whatever proportions these crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who investigated them, that they started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitudes of physicians.

"It started with the acceptance of the attitude, basic to the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and chronically sick.

"Gradually the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans."... (emphasis added)

[read more at link below]

Friday, May 13, 2016

The Dictators of “Legalized” Murder

Murder: “the crime of deliberately killing a person”

The appointed, unelected judicial dictators have given June 6, 2016 as the date for the “law” on “Judicial Approved Murder,” [1] in an ultimatum to the land’s elected politicians.
The politicians hurried and scurried to obey their dictatorial judicial masters and formed a committee to make sure this murderous edict would be carried out. One politician even said this about the proposed parliamentary Bill to kill: "I want a bill that Canadians can be proud of and can say it's a great bill....”
Thinking people, on hearing this, were surely wondering if their country had become a “Perverted Land?” [2]

This was a land with a “Charter of Rights” so how could a country obligate murder?  Had the country succumbed to the “Charter Disease?” [3]
This disease has prevented the country from “working normally.” I believe Canada is now suffering from the adverse effects of this Charter, and that it has created symptoms that could be called “mind disease.” This, I believe, has resulted in abnormal decisions coming from the highest court in the land. These decisions have also affected the minds of the politicians, most of the media and many others in the country, who now accept whatever is described as a “right” under the Charter. I believe this has been done by perverting the law and the language.

“More than a year ago, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Carter vs. Canada that, ‘The prohibition on physician-assisted dying infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.’” Aaron Wherry, CBC News, April 22, 2016.

On reading the quote above, attributed to the Supreme Court of Canada, one has to ask, is this decision an example of the Charter disease preventing the “mind from working normally"? Resulting in a perversion of law and language? Have our “rulers” gone mad? [4]

“Some madness doesn't act mad to begin with, sometimes it will knock politely at the door, and when you let it in, it'll simply sit in the corner without a fuss - and grow.” - Nathan Filer

There is no doubt this madness is growing, and being marketed as a “good.” One could call this depraved act of proposed killing: “The Marketing of Murder.” [5]
Thinking people must surely wonder how the Supreme Court of the land can officially pervert the law and open up the country to state-sanctioned murder, and why a majority of politicians would agree with this “respectable” insanity? But hey, when killing people has to be made respectable, the language has to be perverted. Therefore, these judicial imposed atrocities had to be marketed “properly.” So the immoral acts were described in most of the media as “physician assisted death.”  “Medical assisted suicide” was another “nice” phrase, as was “assisted dying.”  One journalist, though, did describe the real meaning of what was going to be done and said this about the “report”:

Journalist Thomas Walkom with the Toronto Star reported on February 28, 2016 that “The nub of the report is a recommendation that would amend the Criminal Code to let physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners and pharmacists — under special circumstances — kill people.

“Those being killed would be required, in writing if possible, to request their own deaths.” Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/02/28/parliamentary-report-takes-a-too-casual-approach-to-doctor-assisted-death-walkom.html

Death by “legalized killing” is going to be made acceptable, and forced upon this country by the dictators of “legalized” murder. Those in elected positions of power who should be speaking out in horror are instead bowing to and obeying the commands of the nine dictators on the Obscene Court of Canada. And make no mistake, any court that declares murder is permissible, is not a court that should be called “Supreme,” I believe it is Obscene. Repercussions from this abominable decision will be felt in all the medical systems. “Do no harm” will no longer apply, and “compassionate killing” will be the “order” of the day. In fact, some appear ready to placidly accept and participate in “state approved killing,” just like once before in history. A “final solution” is coming to Canada under the guise of “doing good,” and a once “civilized” country buries its morality, ethics and justice with the consent and approval of The Dictators of “Legalized” Murder.

"It started with the acceptance of the attitude, basic to the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and chronically sick. 
"Gradually the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans." Leo Alexander,  American psychiatrist

Stephen J. Gray
May 13, 2016.


Articles of interest: