Saturday, May 28, 2016

Where is the Revulsion and the Outrage?




One would think that civilized people in a supposedly civilized country would be filled with revulsion and outrage that the laws of their land would be perverted to allow “legalized” murder. [1] Have their consciences been killed and their brains befuddled?

Are they too busy watching hockey, basketball, baseball, soccer and other assorted games to realise that they are silent spectators in a game of death organized by the highest court in their land? The appointed, unelected, Supreme Court of Canada has ordered their elected representatives to bring in a Bill by June 6, 2016, to ensure that people who wish to be killed (or “assisted” in “dying”) can get their death wish fulfilled. The government and opposition members, including unelected Senators, are hurrying to get Bill C-14, also known as the Bill to Kill, passed into “law.”

To make this “kindly killing” acceptable, the criminal acts of killing human beings is being called “medical assistance in dying,” or “assisted suicide,” or “physician-hastened death,” and other “nice” phrases and words used to disguise the truth, which is this: people are going to be killed by giving consent to those in the “medical profession” who are supposed to “Do no harm.”  And the criminal code will be subverted to “create exemptions” for their killers.

“This enactment amends the Criminal Code to, among other things,
 (a)create exemptions from the offences of culpable homicide, of aiding suicide and of administering a noxious thing, in order to permit medical practitioners and nurse practitioners to provide medical assistance in dying and to permit pharmacists and other persons to assist in the process;”

Killing people is now called “the process” and Bill C-14, the Bill to Kill, I believe is a sick commentary on the depths of depravity and madness a once civilized country has sunk. Who in their “right mind” could even put this obscenity into “legal” writing is beyond my comprehension. I can only ask, Have “Our Rulers” Gone Mad? [2]

Have the “finest legal minds” and the “intelligentsia” in this once civilized country thought this through? I believe there will be fallout and repercussions from this perversion of law, language, and justice. There could be a plethora of court cases and lawsuits.  People could be killed by “accident,” or “mistakenly” terminated. People could be killed for their property, organs, money, inheritances, life insurance benefits etc. Will some “bad” convicted killers claim there is a double standard, claiming the state is allowed to kill “compassionately” but when they kill in anger or plan a homicide, they are jailed? Will we have “good killings” and bad killings? The crazy horror show that will result from this judicial, political, and medical insanity is waiting to happen!  The lawyer class will have a monetary field day thanks to the lawyers that now are appointed judges on the Obscene Court, oops, I mean the Supreme Court. All this could be called: “The Marketing of Murder in Canada, [3] or in the grip of “The Charter Disease.” [4]
Meanwhile, as I mentioned earlier, many people in the country appear to be blissfully unaware of the danger and seriousness of this situation. Once “legalized” killing starts, death’s door will have been “legally” opened, and the death merchants will arrive. I believe nobody will be safe.

“As two individuals living with severe disabilities due to spinal muscular atrophy, the government's Bill C-14 Medical Assistance in Dying has left us apprehensive and concerned both for ourselves and for our fellow Canadians living with disabilities.”
Pieter Harsevoort and James Schutten. May 24, 2016, Hamilton Spectator

Another country many years ago went down this road of state-sanctioned euthanasia, and “persecution of the disabled.” We should know the history of that. [5] [5a] Could history repeat itself in Canada? Are the masses so entertained and sedated [6] that they are unable to express any revulsion or outrage at what is happening in broad daylight to this country by those in positions of power who are peddling and supporting “assisted” killing as the “final solution” for those who are helpless and suffering?

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,"
George Santayana

Stephen J. Gray
May 28, 2016.

Endnotes:

Links of interest below:
                                                                                                                 



Wednesday, May 25, 2016

The “Legalization” of Murder in Canada



                                                   
“The safety of the people shall be the highest law.”  Marcus Tullius Cicero

“Don’t be silly,” people will say. “Murder can never be legal.” “We have laws against it.” “It is a crime.” Not anymore, if this Bill to Kill is passed. The unelected Supreme Court has given an ultimatum to the elected government to bring in a “law” allowing murder.
The elected politicians and unelected senators stampeded to obey this immoral dictum and are presently worried how they can bring in this Bill to Kill by June 6, 2016, which is the date of the Supreme Court’s ultimatum.
Normal thinking people must be asking themselves: Have Our “Rulers” Gone Mad? [1]

“Some madness doesn't act mad to begin with, sometimes it will knock politely at the door, and when you let it in, it'll simply sit in the corner without a fuss - and grow.” - Nathan Filer

This madness to legalize killing is not only growing, it has also perverted the language in attempts to disguise the proposed acts of homicide. Words and phrases are used and written, and sugar coated to make all this palatable. Some examples are: “Doctor assisted dying, medically assisted suicide,” and other word manipulations. An ethical doctor had this to say about the Bill to Kill:

“It is not surprising that many Canadians are concerned about the dangers of the new assisted suicide and euthanasia bill, C-14. What is really not credible is how the word-benders who used the Charter "right to life" to legalize the intentional suicide or killing of some patients are now protesting that they have been cheated of total victory. While they were in court, they said that all they wanted was for competent consenting adults who were suffering terribly at the end of life to be able to have a doctor kill them, with no criminal consequences for anyone. Now they are hopping mad that non-adults and those who are mentally incompetent, those unable to consent, those whose suffering is purely psychological, and those with years to live just might be excluded. They don't have to worry. The same semantic ju-jitsu which delivered the Carter decision to them will have no problem convincing the courts to invite whoever else to the death party.” Dr. Will Johnston, 04/22/2016, Huffington Post.

I believe the jackboots of the judiciary are stomping on the rule of law in this country, and are now perverting the law. Furthermore, I believe the only way this country can be brought back to sanity is: The Not withstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be used to protect everybody from this abominable decision by unelected judges and their cringing political handmaidens. I also believe that these judges who have advocated the criminal act that some people can be killed, should be removed from the bench and criminally charged.  As should all the politicians, who are aiding and abetting them in sanctioning homicide. Otherwise, this judicial approved murder in Canada could be the death of a decent and civilized country. [2] Meanwhile most of the masses are silent and appear to be sedated into acceptance.

“They are sedating the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying” is the phrase used for killing
The people being terminated must be willing”... [3]

Stephen J. Gray
May 25, 2016.

Endnotes:

Articles of interest below:
                                                      

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Marching To Doomsday




"I have made the most wonderful discovery, I have discovered men will risk their lives, even die, for ribbons" -Napoleon Bonaparte

Marching towards Doomsday in bemedaled uniforms
Are they the NATO-rious war mongers that should be scorned?
Instead they parade and feed off peoples taxes
Bringing death and destruction to many countries masses

Many people follow and obey the dictators of war
Helping them to facilitate endless blood and gore
Hell on earth rains down from the starry heavens
Napoleon says: “men will... even die, for ribbons"

War and more war is their crazy reason for being
Are maniacs of militarism, what we are seeing?
War criminals and political gangs, that are a curse on the world
Evil personified with their war marketing banners unfurled

Maniacal “leaders” of mayhem, who meet in luxury surroundings
Proud of their actions to set countries burning
Creators of refugees and endless bloody wars
They are the war gangsters that should be abhorred

Instead they are praised by politicians “in charge”
These scurrilous “humans” presently at large
Will nobody arrest them, and put them on trial?
These perverts for war are really hostile and vile

If they are not restrained and put in chains
These caricatures of “humanity” will bring the end game
Planners and plotters of killing, and of murder
Organizers of evil tearing the earth asunder

Invaders of countries that never invaded them
These are the war criminals; are they totally insane?
Could the final acts of these madmen be coming our way?
Will nuclear war be the end of, The March to Doomsday?

“War is madness” - Pope Francis


Stephen J. Gray
May 22, 2016.

Info of interest at links below:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years”

“France's Former Foreign Minister: UK Government Prepared War in Syria Two Years Before 2011 Protests”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------s





Thursday, May 19, 2016

“Sunny Ways” Becomes Nasty Ways in Nonsenseland




Nonsenseland’s parliament, the House of “right honourable’ and “honourable” persons, erupted into a bedlam of fury, shouts, threats, reported assault, obscene language and other disgraceful behaviour unbecoming of this land of “democracy.”
It seems the Leader of the land was about to limit debate on the “Assisted Suicide Bill,” or to phrase it truthfully, the Bill to Kill.  This caused outrage amongst the opposition.

Then the Land’s right honourable leader strode arrogantly and purposefully across the floor of the House and reportedly “manhandled” another honourable member. One female member claimed she was assaulted in the chest by the leader’s elbow, surely a sad and sorry state of affairs perpetrated by a “sunny ways” gentleman who claims to be a “feminist.” Another member was reportedly told to get the f*** out of the way. It appeared this Bill to Kill was causing the rise of unpleasant feelings amongst the “honourable” members. But hey, contemplating killing should be unpleasant.

Here they were discussing the killing of helpless people, and the leader of the land was trying to limit debate. What was his hurry? Most of the “honourable” members were all in favour of the Bill to Kill, could he not let them have a little bit of limelight on the House floor? After all, they all like to speak supportive political platitudes on this Bill to Kill, and some even want the Bill on Killing to be expanded to allow others to be “kindly dispatched.”

Still, there was a Supreme Court deadline (no pun intended) to be reached, and perhaps that was why the Land’s leader was in a hurry to get all this death dealing over with. After all, there are people waiting to be killed “compassionately,” so perhaps an excuse can be made for the “sunny ways” of the leader turning nasty, because he was worried about the judicial deadline (again no pun intended).

Therefore, before all this blame is heaped upon the Leader of Nonsenseland becoming nasty, why don’t we put some blame on the appointed unelected judges where it all began. They were the ones who gave the elected government of Nonsenseland a deadline to bring in killing. They are the ones who perverted the land’s Charter that has a “right to life.” Nowhere does it have a “right to kill.” They invented a “right” to kill and now the leader of the land has lost his head in anger, perhaps under pressure from the court’s deadline.  His “sunny ways” has turned into nasty ways. If he and all the other MPs had the courage to use the Not-Withstanding Clause in the Charter they could prevent this abomination by dictatorial judges. But, courage appears to be lacking. Therefore, is all this nonsense an example of the want of ethics, morality and principles in Nonsenseland’s parliament?

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

Stephen J. Gray
May 19, 2016.

Articles of interest at links below:

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Sedating the Masses




They are sedating the masses with nice sounding words
Murder is camouflaged and deliberately blurred
“Assistance in dying” is the phrase used for killing
The people being terminated must be willing

A “law” is being passed and “justice” will be meted out
The politicians will praise their own “ethics,” no doubt
The Bill that they pass in the House on the Hill
Will be hailed as “compassionate” and given a “right” to kill

Is this what happens when “rulers” go mad?
And they cannot see that “ethical” murder is bad
Could the “health” system become unhealthy and more
Will doctors be licensed to open death’s door?

Is history repeating itself once again?
Will state-sanctioned killing start to reign?
Will it gradually creep into every day living?
Will it even encompass some who are unwilling?

Once “legalized” murder becomes acceptable
Will there be no holding back the disreputable?
Are the death warrants signed and judicially approved?
Is the day coming when anyone can be “removed”?

Still, this is a land of the “Charter” and “sunny ways”
Where people will be “assisted” to end their days
A caring and humanitarian land with a “right to kill”
Where the always available taxpayer will foot the bill

Accessories to murder, after the fact
Paying for unfortunate people to get whacked
Still, there are those who support this I suppose!
Don’t they realize, “our emperors have no clothes”?

As long as it is sold and marketed as compassion
Perverting words and language could be in fashion
Are “mad rulers” wearing “rose tinted glasses”?
Does it all come down to sedating the masses?

Stephen J. Gray
May 18, 2016.

Articles of interest at link below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Euthanasia in Nazi Germany - The T4 Programme
...
In his "Medical Science under Dictatorship", published in the New England Journal of Medicine, July, 1949, Dr Alexander observed:

"Whatever proportions these crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who investigated them, that they started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitudes of physicians.

"It started with the acceptance of the attitude, basic to the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and chronically sick.

"Gradually the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans."... (emphasis added)

[read more at link below]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------












Friday, May 13, 2016

The Dictators of “Legalized” Murder




Murder: “the crime of deliberately killing a person”

The appointed, unelected judicial dictators have given June 6, 2016 as the date for the “law” on “Judicial Approved Murder,” [1] in an ultimatum to the land’s elected politicians.
The politicians hurried and scurried to obey their dictatorial judicial masters and formed a committee to make sure this murderous edict would be carried out. One politician even said this about the proposed parliamentary Bill to kill: "I want a bill that Canadians can be proud of and can say it's a great bill....”
Thinking people, on hearing this, were surely wondering if their country had become a “Perverted Land?” [2]

This was a land with a “Charter of Rights” so how could a country obligate murder?  Had the country succumbed to the “Charter Disease?” [3]
This disease has prevented the country from “working normally.” I believe Canada is now suffering from the adverse effects of this Charter, and that it has created symptoms that could be called “mind disease.” This, I believe, has resulted in abnormal decisions coming from the highest court in the land. These decisions have also affected the minds of the politicians, most of the media and many others in the country, who now accept whatever is described as a “right” under the Charter. I believe this has been done by perverting the law and the language.

“More than a year ago, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Carter vs. Canada that, ‘The prohibition on physician-assisted dying infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.’” Aaron Wherry, CBC News, April 22, 2016.

On reading the quote above, attributed to the Supreme Court of Canada, one has to ask, is this decision an example of the Charter disease preventing the “mind from working normally"? Resulting in a perversion of law and language? Have our “rulers” gone mad? [4]

“Some madness doesn't act mad to begin with, sometimes it will knock politely at the door, and when you let it in, it'll simply sit in the corner without a fuss - and grow.” - Nathan Filer

There is no doubt this madness is growing, and being marketed as a “good.” One could call this depraved act of proposed killing: “The Marketing of Murder.” [5]
Thinking people must surely wonder how the Supreme Court of the land can officially pervert the law and open up the country to state-sanctioned murder, and why a majority of politicians would agree with this “respectable” insanity? But hey, when killing people has to be made respectable, the language has to be perverted. Therefore, these judicial imposed atrocities had to be marketed “properly.” So the immoral acts were described in most of the media as “physician assisted death.”  “Medical assisted suicide” was another “nice” phrase, as was “assisted dying.”  One journalist, though, did describe the real meaning of what was going to be done and said this about the “report”:

Journalist Thomas Walkom with the Toronto Star reported on February 28, 2016 that “The nub of the report is a recommendation that would amend the Criminal Code to let physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners and pharmacists — under special circumstances — kill people.

“Those being killed would be required, in writing if possible, to request their own deaths.” Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/02/28/parliamentary-report-takes-a-too-casual-approach-to-doctor-assisted-death-walkom.html

Death by “legalized killing” is going to be made acceptable, and forced upon this country by the dictators of “legalized” murder. Those in elected positions of power who should be speaking out in horror are instead bowing to and obeying the commands of the nine dictators on the Obscene Court of Canada. And make no mistake, any court that declares murder is permissible, is not a court that should be called “Supreme,” I believe it is Obscene. Repercussions from this abominable decision will be felt in all the medical systems. “Do no harm” will no longer apply, and “compassionate killing” will be the “order” of the day. In fact, some appear ready to placidly accept and participate in “state approved killing,” just like once before in history. A “final solution” is coming to Canada under the guise of “doing good,” and a once “civilized” country buries its morality, ethics and justice with the consent and approval of The Dictators of “Legalized” Murder.

"It started with the acceptance of the attitude, basic to the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and chronically sick. 
"Gradually the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans." Leo Alexander,  American psychiatrist


Stephen J. Gray
May 13, 2016.
 

Endnotes:

Articles of interest:


Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Plunder, Pillage, Loot and Pollute




Plunder, pillage, loot and pollute
They are the barbarians in expensive suits
“Free trading” the earth back and forth to each other
Robbing the earth’s people of all that matters

Buying and selling countries at will
Aided and abetted by political puppets and their shills
Marketing their “products” as a “good” for all
The corporate cannibals are having a ball

Producers of death, destruction and war
Financiers of filth and rotten to the core
Suppliers of weapons to both sides in battle
People are slaughtered like bloody cattle

Cities and homes and countries too
Are used as “playgrounds” for this immoral crew
“Games” are used to divert attention
Ancient Rome returns in another dimension

Parades and circuses organized for the masses
Some even march naked and show their asses
“Law and order” participates in these orgies of obscenity
And the “news” media “praise” this show of “identity”

Corporate logos are proudly at front and centre
And washrooms can be used by any gender
Any critics of the present deranged debauchery
Are ridiculed and ostracized and sent to Coventry

Each day brings more and more “newsworthy” insanity
Marketed and accepted even though it’s profanity
Nobody dare criticize, laugh, or refute
This is the evil of plunder, pillage, loot and pollute

Stephen J. Gray
April 27, 2016.

Articles of interest at Links below:



Friday, April 22, 2016

The Charter Disease



“Simple Definition of disease
: an illness that affects a person, animal, or plant : a condition that prevents the body or mind from working normally
: a problem that a person, group, organization, or society has and cannot stop”

I believe Canada is suffering from The Charter Disease. This disease has prevented the country from “working normally.” I believe Canada is now suffering from the adverse effects of this Charter, and that it has created symptoms that could be called “mind disease.” This, I believe, has resulted in abnormal decisions coming from the highest court in the land. These decisions have also affected the minds of the politicians, most of the media and others in the country, who now accept whatever is described as a “right” under the Charter. I believe this has been done by perverting the law and the language.

“More than a year ago, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Carter vs. Canada that, ‘The prohibition on physician-assisted dying infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.’” Aaron Wherry, CBC News, April 22, 2016.

On reading the quote above, attributed to the Supreme Court of Canada, one has to ask, is this an example of the Charter disease preventing the “mind from working normally"? Resulting in a perversion of law and language? Have our “rulers” gone mad?

If the disease of madness has taken root in Canada, and is infecting the country, what can be done to cure it? Could a state of emergency be declared? Who can save the country from this Charter disease, if power is the hands of the unelected, and the elected are contaminated by the unelected?  What is the answer to this conundrum? Do the people of the country docilely accept the fact that “Judicial Approved Murder Comes To Canada”?

Are those suffering from this illness going to be allowed to continue to spread the Charter disease? What other contaminated and other insane rulings could be perpetrated on the populace if this Charter disease continues its ascendance?

“In fact the Charter was a ruse. [Pierre] Trudeau wanted to consolidate power in the Supreme Court of Canada and weaken Parliament.” [1] In so doing he altered the legal structure of the country from a constitutional monarchy to an oligarchy in one fell swoop.”
Joe C.W. Armstrong, in his book “Farewell the Peaceful Kingdom” page 75.
,
This Charter disease was imposed without an individual vote of the people. Surely if people are to live by a set of rules they should have the chance to vote on these rules? Instead we have a situation where this Charter is interpreted by appointed, non-elected judges, or to put it bluntly, ex-lawyers. These ex-lawyers, now judges, are appointed by the Prime Minister of whatever political party is in power. Any thinking person has to ask, “How can non-elected judges rule the people from a document that was not given acceptance by the people?” What will it take before the people are pushed to their limits? Even a worm will turn eventually. What will be the catalyst that turns disgust into action? Every action has a reaction as the saying goes. What will the reaction be when a civilized society finally realizes democracy no longer exists?

“The dramatic change imposed on the country should have incited members of the law profession to take up arms. Instead without a whimper the Supreme Court of Canada was handed the ultimate power of determining the most fundamental rights of the country as the Charter outlined them. The loss of freedoms to Canadian society was beyond measure, equivalent only to military conquest.” [3]
Joe C.W. Armstrong in his book “Farewell the Peaceful Kingdom” page 206.

In closing, I believe the only antidote left to save this country from the latest diabolical decision by the Supreme Court of Canada is the use of the Notwithstanding Clause.

Stephen J. Gray
April 22, 2016.

Saturday, April 16, 2016

Judicial Approved Murder Comes To Canada




“229 Culpable homicide is murder
(a) where the person who causes the death of a human being
(i) means to cause his death, or
(ii) means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not;...”

I believe the laws of Canada have been subverted by those who are supposed to uphold the law. Nine unelected judges of the Supreme Court of Canada have declared persons can be killed. They gave the elected government a time frame to bring in this perversion of justice. The government of the day set up a committee to decide who could be killed and their recommendations were published recently.

“Canada will allow people with incurable illness or disability to end their lives with a doctor's help but stopped short of extending the right to minors and the mentally ill, according to draft legislation introduced on Thursday.” Leah Schnurr,  Reuters, April 14, 2016.

“Canada’s Catholic bishops have denounced the Liberal bill legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide as ‘an affront to human dignity, an erosion of human solidarity, and a danger to all vulnerable persons.’” Lianne Laurence, April 15, 2016, Lifesite News. The Lifesite article went on to say:
“The Liberals’ long-awaited draft legislation introduced April 14 is intended to amend the two Criminal Code sections prohibiting assisted suicide and euthanasia that were struck down by the Supreme Court’s February 2015 Carter decision as unconstitutional. That court decision takes effect June 6, 2016.”

I believe what we are seeing in Canada is a perversion of law and justice by those in positions of power. Unelected judges are dictating to elected politicians. The politicians who sit in Parliament have allowed the unelected judiciary to give them an ultimatum to approve killing. Therefore, I believe the question must be asked: What is the point in voting for politicians when judges can dictate that people can be murdered by people in the medical system?

Journalist Thomas Walkom with the Toronto Star reported on February 28, 2016 that “The nub of the report is a recommendation that would amend the Criminal Code to let physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners and pharmacists — under special circumstances — kill people.

“Those being killed would be required, in writing if possible, to request their own deaths.” Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/02/28/parliamentary-report-takes-a-too-casual-approach-to-doctor-assisted-death-walkom.html

What is even worse, helpless and vulnerable people could be pressured into accepting being killed, albeit “compassionately.” The language has been debased, mangled and twisted to make the killing sound good. Words and phrases used by most of the media are “Doctor assisted death”, “Physician assisted death,” “Medically assisted end of Life,” and on and on the sugar coated propaganda goes, to disguise the fact that people are going to be “kindly” killed. There are cases on record of people being charged with murder for killing the disabled and sentenced to prison in Canada. Now the Supreme Court of Canada is permitting killing by the state! The bizarre is now the “law.” In fact, I believe what we are seeing is: “The Marketing of Murder in Canada.”

“The bias of the Canadian news media not only trivializes the murder of one child with a disability, it also accelerates the forces that ensure future violence and more deaths.... The Latimer case and its portrayal in the media raise doubts that assisted suicide can ever be allowed without condemning some people with disabilities to an unrequested death.”
Prof. Dick Sobsey, University of Alberta Abuse and Disability Project

I believe the only way this country can be brought back to sanity is: The Not withstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be used to protect everybody from this abominable decision by unelected judges and their political handmaidens. I also believe that these judges who have advocated the criminal act that some people can be killed, should be removed from the bench and criminally charged.  As should all the politicians, who are aiding and abetting them in sanctioning homicide. Otherwise, this judicial authorized murder in Canada could be the death of a decent and civilized country.

“I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.” - Thomas Jefferson

Stephen J. Gray
April 16, 2016.

Articles of interest at link below:

Friday, April 15, 2016

Oh Canada, Our Home, and Perverted Land




Oh Canada, our home and perverted land
Where it’s okay to be killed, by a doctor’s hand
Nine unelected judges, stated people can be killed
And the elected politicians bended, to the judges will

Death’s door has been opened and bodies will be ushered in
The killings will be hailed as “compassionate,” did the Devil win?
Has “respectable evil” triumphed, and where will it all end?
Now that killing is “legalized,” what else will judges recommend?

Could killing people for their organs, be the next “rule of law”?
After all why waste available organs, if there is no flaw?
This is “human capital” surely this flesh should be used?
Just ask the judges first, before it is removed.

Once before in history people were deemed disposable
It finished up in millions dead and acts that were unspeakable
Now “civilized” Canada, “legalizes” killing on command
Oh! O Canada, our home and perverted land.

Stephen J. Gray
April 15, 2016.

Articles of interest at links below:

Euthanasia in Nazi Germany - The T4 Programme
...In his "Medical Science under Dictatorship", published in the New England Journal of Medicine, July, 1949, Dr Alexander observed:

"Whatever proportions these crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who investigated them, that they started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basic attitudes of physicians.

"It started with the acceptance of the attitude, basic to the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and chronically sick. 
"Gradually the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans."... (emphasis added)
[read more at link below]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------