Saturday, May 18, 2013

The Slaughter,The Killings and The Coverup in Canada

Who would have believed that in the supposedly civilized country of Canada, 491 babies that were born alive after failed killings by abortion were then left to die, or that this atrocity would not even be investigated? Or that those in positions of power, namely the justice system, the leader of the federal government and most of the politicians of all the political parties would remain silent on this appalling heinous criminality? A headline in Postmedia News of January 31, 2013, said this: “Tory backbenchers call on RCMP to investigate late-term abortions, but PM says the debate is closed” the article was written by Tobi Cohen.

In fact, the country’s leader, the right honourable Stephen Harper is quoted in the article as saying this on the monstrous atrocity: "I think all members of this House, whether they agree with it or not, understand that abortion is legal in Canada and this government, myself included, have made it very clear that the government does not intend to change the law in this regard" [1]

 These babies were born alive, after failed killings; therefore, in these 491 cases this isn’t a matter of abortion—it’s a matter of infanticide: and that IS against Canadian law.  Mr. Harper should at least know that difference. Yet, he continues to do nothing about this contravention of the criminal code:

“According to the Criminal Code, a child is considered to be a human being and a person after proceeding fully from the mother's womb, therefore, based on Section 223(2) of the Criminal Code, there should be 491 homicide investigations or prosecutions in connection with these deaths.” [1]

But to date, nothing has been done. These 491 innocents have received no justice and no recognition of their humanity. Yet, a lawless Canada--Canada has no law on abortion--led by PM Stephen Harper is always boasting that they, the Conservatives, are the “party of law and order.” What an abominable disgrace this government is, as are the other political parties in this House of Evil called parliament. 491 babies cry out for justice and only three MPs spoke out to try and right this terrible injustice.

Animals get more respect in this country than human life. One has only to think back to the frenzy and outcry over the slaughtered sled dogs at Whistler [2] to realize that animal lives are more of a priority than innocent tiny humans. Something is deadly wrong in our society today when a mass human killing of this magnitude is covered up, or missed by the mainstream media. One wonders if it had been 491 dogs slaughtered or left to die—would the media have missed or censored the evidence? Based on their reporting on the killing of animals, I don’t believe so.

In fact, many media show their bias in favour of killing by abortion.  Consider an editorial headlined “The Abortion debate is over so shut up” in the Vancouver Province of November 20, 2012, which stated,

“Anti-abortionists need to get this through their skulls: the debate is over and you lost. Women long ago won the right to have control over their bodies, and the choice about whether and when to have children, and Canadians massively support that right. Abortion is not murder, so get over it.” [3]

But it is not only The Province newspaper that shows its bias on the killing by abortionists. Recently, the Canadian Centre for Bioethical Reform sent out a media release entitled “Abortion Face-Off with Stephen Harper.” [4] Which was a postcard distribution in Stephen Harper’s riding. I did not see any media coverage of these postcards from the National Post, The Globe and Mail or the Toronto Star. The CBC did a story but said: “CBC has decided not to use those images.” [5] the images were of Stephen Harper and an aborted baby. Nor did these three newspapers cover the Launch of, “The New Abortion Caravan” [6] in a busy downtown Vancouver location last year.

I believe this lawless atrocity called abortion in Canada shows the culpability of so-called “investigative journalism.” Their coverage of abortion and the crimes of abortionists is mostly limited. They show no pictures of these little innocent victims, except of course if it’s animals--then the slaughter is all over the airwaves, TV stations and the newspapers.  There are a few journalists who have spoken out on the abortion issue, but sadly only a few. Most of the media in Canada covered up these 491 homicides of these little innocents. And thanks to an ongoing cover-up by many powers-that-be, this evil atrocity in Canada continues.

Stephen J. Gray
May 18, 2013.

Note: Definition of Accessory After the Fact:
“Whoever, knowing that an offense has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists any offender in order to hinder or prevent his or her apprehension, trial or punishment, is called an accessory after the fact….” (emphasis added)


Articles of interest at links below: