Monday, May 18, 2009

Is Butchering Humans by Abortion "Safe Medical Services"?

“Thank you for your correspondence concerning Canada’s abortion laws. It is the longstanding view of the Liberal Party of Canada that women must have the right to choose, and this party will take no step that limits, or opens the door to limiting, access to safe medical services for women across Canada.”
The Office of Michael Ignatieff, M.P. Leader of the Opposition

It would appear that the leader of the opposition in Canada believes that the “right to choose” to kill the innocents in the womb in Canada can be described as “safe medical services.” One wonders what is “safe” about cutting to pieces, tearing apart by powerful suction devices, beheading, poisoning [in the case of a saline abortion], and then disposing of these little innocents slaughtered by abortionists, like some kind of garbage? Surely calling this atrocity “safe medical services” is very unsafe and deadly for the innocent life in the womb? I believe that a more apt description would be legalized slaughter aided and abetted by those in Canada in positions of power, who would rather use politically correct words to disguise what “the right to choose” really means.

The Liberal party of Canada is not the only party to attempt to camouflage the horror of abortion by politically correct words. Stephen Harper, prime minister and leader of the Conservative Party of Canada is on record as saying this on abortion:

“Let me be very clear on the positions I’ve have taken on that. I want there to be no misunderstanding. I’ve said repeatedly, that I will not, that my Conservative government will not be tabling any legislation impacting in any way a woman’s right to choose” (June 27, 2006

And the leader of the NDP, Jack Layton, supports freedom of choice on abortion and had this to say about Canada’s foremost abortionist: “On behalf of the New Democratic Party of Canada, I salute Dr. Henry Morgentaler as one of the 2008 recipients of the Order of Canada” (July 2, 2008

Canada today has no law on abortion. The little innocents in the womb can be killed right up to the moment of birth, and those in positions of power boast they are in favor of  the “right to choose” to kill these innocents!  Therefore the question has to be asked: Do we live in a sick society?  Most certainly. The evidence for the humanity of the unborn child is irrefutable. We can see them on ultrasound; there are pictures of them sucking their thumbs in the womb, and we even operate on them (when they are "wanted," that is) to correct some medical problems. In fact, click here to see a picture of an unborn baby grasping his surgeon's finger:

“A woman’s right to choose” rolling off the tongues of politicians makes this heinous act of slaughtering vulnerable unborn human beings sound like something on a menu. So what does it really mean? The politicians, being politicians, don’t like to go into detail about this slaughter by “choice,” so instead they would rather parrot  political phrases about being in favor of “freedom of choice;” however, the reality is that supporting “choice” on abortion actually means cutting the unborn to pieces, suctioning their bodies apart, or injecting potassium chloride into their hearts. Other unborn children are murdered by having their skulls pierced by sharp scissors and their brains suctioned out (partial birth abortion). Some have been born alive but are left to die. Barbarity is being practiced and human sacrifices are made.

The “right to choose” spoken of by politicians of all political stripes is a political perversion of words for killing by choice on abortion. For any politician to describe the heinous act of abortion as “safe medical services” is surely to demonstrate a sick corruption of words. The Roman politician Seneca said it well when he said, “Where the speech is corrupted, the mind is also.”

Note: See the innocents slaughtered by “safe medical services” at:

Stephen J. Gray
May 18, 2009.