Sunday, July 7, 2013

The Evil of Empires




"Some European countries have to liberate themselves from North American imperialism," he said. "I can't understand how some countries can be faithful, obedient servants to the North American empire."
President Evo Morales of Bolivia, quoted in Wall St. Journal Online, July 4, 2013.

We have seen and read the latest revelations of a “democratic” empire spying on its citizens and the whole world. The man who revealed the secret spying of the empire was Edward Snowden. His reward for speaking out and telling the truth about illegal acts is to be vilified in much of the corporate owned media and to be refused asylum for his service to humanity. Some of the countries refusing him asylum are ones who claim to be outraged over the spying on them by a “democratic ally.” What we are seeing is open hypocrisy by the puppets of the empire which are all in lockstep with the dictates of the empire of evil. A globalist, new world order is already in control, and nobody must be allowed to disobey or expose its evil machinations. That is why Edward Snowden must be hunted down and brought to heel like a dog, rather than a human being who deserves praise and recognition. Evil is in control and it is determined not to be thwarted, for if Edward Snowden succeeds, then more people might find the courage to speak out against the tyranny of evil that is blanketing the earth and its inhabitants.

Some of the excuses used by Edward Snowden’s detractors are: “He took an oath of secrecy.” Well excuse me, when did an oath of secrecy cover illegal acts and breaking the law? Oh, I forgot, we don’t have any laws when gangsters rule. We just have mafia style words like omerta to protect the gang.

Omerta definition: A rule or code that prohibits speaking or divulging information about certain activities, especially the activities of a criminal organization. [1]

Then we have other statements by some of the political and media hypocrites. Edward Snowden “committed treason.” Yet some of these governments are arming and supplying Al-Qaeda in Libya [2] [3] and Syria [4] with weapons, and this is the same terrorists that killed and maimed soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now these establishment elites have the gall to call Edward Snowden’s action, treason for telling the truth. I believe based on the evidence, the real treasonous villains are in positions of power. What a bunch of filthy hypocrites we [5] have ruling over us.

I believe we are in the hands of treacherous villains, who have no ethics, no morals and no principles. They think nothing of killing children and adults by using drones. [6] [7]  Oh, I forgot, sometimes they apologize for their “mistakes.” They think nothing of consorting with dictators and despots and spying on their citizens while at the same time mouthing the words, “let democracy rule.” Yet, these are the people who vilify Edward Snowden.  Let’s face it, based on the evidence, we are in the hands of “respectable” evil and it is being tolerated.

“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.”
― Thomas Mann, The Magic Mountain

Stephen J. Gray
July 7, 2013.


Endnotes:



Articles of interest at links below:


The Criminal N.S.A.

NSA PRISM, Edward Snowden, Who Are The Real Traitors?

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Is Red Tory Big Brother Watching YOU? (Satire) By Stephen J. Gray



Is  Red Tory Big Brother Watching YOU?
(Satire) By Stephen J. Gray

“The Conservatives have enlisted neighbourhood leaders – sports team coaches, community activists – to report information on voters to the party's data collectors…” [1]
( Globe and Mail, Sept. 12, 2008.)

The following conversation is imaginary.
A Red Tory party member phones up party HQ.

“Hello Red Tory HQ. How may I help you?”

“Hi, this is Karl reporting in as requested with information on one of my neighbours.”

Red Tory, HQ person: “What did you say your name was?”

“My name is Karl Marks.”

Red Tory, HQ person:  “Well aren’t you well named, just kidding of course. What is your party card number? What info do you have for us?”

Karl Marks: “First of all my last name is spelt Marks not Marx. My party card number is Red Tory 666.”

Red Tory HQ person: “Red Tory 666 aren’t you a devil? Ha ha.  I’m joking of course. What info do you have for us?”

Karl Marks: “My neighbour is a soft socialist and usually has a socialist election sign on his lawn. There is no sign this time. I have been having conversations with him about our great Red Tory party. He appears conducive to our ideas and I believe I may be able to turn him towards voting for us.”

Red Tory, HQ, person: “Wow! Great stuff. What has he been saying about our party?”

Karl Marks:  He says he liked the way we handled the same-sex marriage issue. He also praised our leader for saying he would never use the not-withstanding clause on that issue of same-sex marriage.  He also likes our stand on abortion, and our leader saying that he will never bring in any legislation on it. He also supports the way we trashed the “unborn child” private members bill. He also approves of our stand against free speech and is against backbenchers speaking out.  He is in favour of human rights commissions just like us. He is also impressed with the billions of dollars the party has poured into Quebec and our government making them a ‘nation’ within the country. He also likes our leader’s ‘strategic partnership’ with communist China and says, this a sign to him that communists and conservatives can be partners. He also says our party sounds just like a Socialist/Liberal party in some ways, and he is seriously considering voting for us.”

Red Tory, HQ, person: “This is fantastic news. How do you think we might secure his vote?”

Karl Marks: “I told him, all were welcome in our Big Red Tory Tent and that our leader is dedicated to accountability and that political labels really mean nothing anymore. He agreed and said: ‘That’s for sure.’ He thinks one big political party would be best for the country and thinks the way we are performing we could be it. My suggestion is for our great leader to call him personally and invite his input into the next election. That just might be the clincher.

Red Tory, HQ, person: “Thank you Karl, for this report on your neighbour. It is so encouraging to know that a socialist seems to be coming on board. We rely on you and people like you to be the eyes and ears of the party. Keep watching, listening and informing on your neighbors. Bye for now.”

Stephen J. Gray
June 30, 2013,




Endnote:




Sunday, June 16, 2013

Harper’s “True Believers” Congregate in Calgary




“I barely recognize ourselves, and worse I fear that we have morphed into what we once mocked.” Former Conservative MP Brent Rathgeber [1]

Calgary will host a “Conservative” convention of Harper supporters June 27-29, 2013.  postponed and re-scheduled, new dates are Oct. 31 to Nov.2, 2013.
 One wonders what goes on in their heads as they cheer and shake hands with each other and worship their “great leader.” What do they have to be happy about? Are they led by a man of principle? Has he been true to his word? Has he defended Canadian sovereignty?  Does he have courage? Does he protect free speech and free expression? Do they know what is in the “secretive” and “hidden” trade deals? Do they support “greater economic integration with the EU?” Are they in favour of a “strategic partnership” with Communist China? Do they trust Stephen Harper implicitly?

 Or is Brent Rathgeber correct when he says: the conservatives have become “what we once mocked.”
Therefore, let us look at some of the issues the Harper government has been or is involved in.

Free Speech: Harper’s government sided with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) against free speech. [2] Yet, Stephen Harper once said this about Human Rights Commissions: “Human rights commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society … It is, in fact, totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff” (emphasis added)

Canadian Sovereignty: The Prime Minister of Canada, Stephen Harper has proposed a Free Trade deal with the EU. The Montreal Gazette of April 28, 2012 had the headline, “Tories pitch EU free-trade deal online…text of pact remains hidden from public” The article went on to state: “The deal is not just about free trade, which eliminates tariffs at the border, but greater economic integration with the EU.” [3] And Stephen Harper is on record as saying this:
“We need some semblance of global governance” “I know some people don’t like it, it’s a loss of national sovereignty” Stephen Harper [4]
And the Harper government has joined the “secretive” Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) which, according to some reports also jeopardizes national sovereignty. [5]

Lawlessness in Canada: Who would have believed that in the supposedly civilized country of Canada, 491 babies that were born alive after failed killings by abortion were then left to die, or that this atrocity would not even be investigated? Or that those in positions of power, namely the justice system, the leader of the federal government and most of the politicians of all the political parties would remain silent on this appalling heinous criminality? A headline in Postmedia News of January 31, 2013, said this: “Tory backbenchers call on RCMP to investigate late-term abortions, but PM says the debate is closed” the article was written by Tobi Cohen.
In fact, the country’s leader, the right honourable Stephen Harper is quoted in the article as saying this on the monstrous atrocity: "I think all members of this House, whether they agree with it or not, understand that abortion is legal in Canada and this government, myself included, have made it very clear that the government does not intend to change the law in this regard"
These babies were born alive, after failed killings; therefore, in these 491 cases this isn’t a matter of abortion—it’s a matter of infanticide: and that IS against Canadian law.  Mr. Harper should at least know that difference. Yet, he continues to do nothing about this contravention of the criminal code: [6] [7]

Consorting with Communists: We see a supposedly, “conservative” Prime Minister consorting with a communist dictatorship. (One thought only “left wingers” did that?) His speeches spread the message that this is a “strategic partnership.” Most of the corporate “free enterprise” media swoon over this communist partnership and tell the masses how wonderful it is. Meanwhile, big business accompanies this “conservative” and they all are seeking business opportunities in this land of the dictatorship. This is a land that has been known to use slave labour, has exported poisoned goods, and where many workers have committed suicide due to the bad working conditions. Where women are coerced into forced abortions and people have been tortured for showing dissent. [8] [9]

But hey, dissent in Harper’s Canada is almost obliterated, just look at the few Tory MPs who have tried to speak out. Mind you they have not been tortured, yet! Just kidding! But, they get “whipped” into submission, then some of them say how they “admire” and “respect” Harper. He must be having a good laugh at their grovelling subservience. A handful of MPs have spoken out but the rest have sat back in cowardly silence. Strange things are happening in that Tory caucus. Some of those who complained they were “muzzled” now say they “admire” Harper. Which makes one wonder, are some of them suffering from Beaten Dog Syndrome where a dog, after it is beaten, comes back to lick the hand of its master, and cowers and crawls on its belly for his favour despite all the evils heaped upon it? [10] [11]

The information in this article should give Harper’s “true believers” something to chew on.  But will they? Will the “true believers” continue to exist in their servile stupor; content in the dictates of their leader of whom it has been said:

“…Harper's whole time in office has been spent reassuring the public he has no plans to lead them anywhere, that under a Conservative government nothing much would change — they would govern much like the Liberals,…”
Andrew Coyne in MacLean’s of September 10, 2008,

Stephen J. Gray
June 16, 2013.


Endnotes:











Articles of interest at links below:



Sunday, May 26, 2013

Can a “pledge” and a “promise” be made for Lawlessness?




Can a “pledge” and a “promise” be made for Lawlessness?
By Stephen J. Gray


“The Prime Minister reminded his MPs he made a pledge to Canadians during the 2011 election: that his government would not reopen the abortion debate and that Conservatives wouldn’t bring forward legislation on the topic.” -Globe and Mail, March 28, 2013.

Abortion kills an innocent human life. Canada has no law on killing by abortion, just like communist China and North Korea. Yet, there are those in positions of power who do not want to stop the killing, despite all the evidence that we have of the humanity of the pre-born child. The leader of the Conservative government, P.M. Stephen Harper, is on the record as saying this: “As long as I am prime minister we are not opening the abortion debate” (quoted in Globe and Mail, April 21, 2011).

Therefore, one has to ask the question, can a “pledge” be made to continue this lawlessness on abortion, and can one man, Stephen Harper, be allowed to impose his view on this issue on parliament?

The Globe and Mail of March 28, 2013, updated April 2, 2013, in an article by Gloria Galloway and Steven Chase stated, “The Prime Minister faced a brewing revolt from backbenchers this week concerning the grip his office exerts on their conduct, a rebellion that was triggered by Mr. Harper’s refusal to allow a vote on a B.C. MP’s motion condemning sex-selective abortions and then escalated into a bigger fight over how much autonomy Tory members of Parliament should have in the Commons….”

The article went on to state, “The Prime Minister reminded his MPs he made a pledge to Canadians during the 2011 election: that his government would not reopen the abortion debate and that Conservatives wouldn’t bring forward legislation on the topic.”… (emphasis added) The article further stated, “Last week the Conservatives collaborated with the NDP and Liberals to declare Mr. Warawa’s motion ineligible for further debate – essentially rendering it dead – despite the opinion of a Library of Parliament analyst who said it was entirely within bounds….” [1]

So there we have it, Mr. Accountability himself, Stephen Harper, hiding behind a “pledge,” which really is a suppression of free speech. Then the so-called “Conservatives” gang up with the Liberals and the NDP against Warawa’s motion. What an undemocratic gang of political hypocrites these politicians are and a danger to a supposed democratic society. And one of Harper’s MPs, Michelle Rempel, climbed aboard the pro-abortion bandwagon and parroted this excuse:

“A lot has been talked about this year about the ability of parliamentarians to have respectful debate on a wide variety of issues and I certainly support that principle. Having said that ... we made a promise to Canadians,” [on abortion] said Rempel. [2: Calgary Herald May 23, 2013.]

Rempel says she supports “debate,” and “that principle,” yet her party “collaborated” with the opposition to suppress debate. Is it any wonder politicians have no credibility?

The above information should surely raise this important question: How can anyone in a supposedly democratic society make a “pledge” or a “promise” not to reopen debate on any issue, abortion or otherwise?

I believe we have reached a stage in this country where free speech and free expression have become a sham [3] when all three political parties conspire together and collaborate against having the House vote on a motion of another member of parliament, namely MP Mark Warawa.  If these undemocratic politicians can do that against him, then the precedent has been set, and others could be next. Don’t these political dolts understand what they have done? In their haste to allow this killing by abortion in Canada to continue, they have become just like P.M. Stephen Harper and his lackeys; they all have made a “pledge” and a “promise” for lawlessness.

Stephen J. Gray
May 26, 2013.


Note: See the slaughtered victims of abortion at: www.unmaskingchoice.ca 

Endnotes:



Article of interest at link below:


Wednesday, May 22, 2013

A Thank You to Friends from High in the Sky





A Thank You to Friends from High in the Sky
(Satire) by Stephen J. Gray

Friends,
As I fly through the air for another visit to other countries, and rack up the air miles, I am quite happy to be on my way again. It will be nice to get away and not answer any questions about the distraction of the so-called senate scandal. As you know, I promised Senate reform some time ago, but a thought just came to me, who needs it now? We have a majority in the Senate, and I appointed a whole bunch of the gang, oops I mean honourable ones. And I could appoint more at my leisure, so why interrupt a good thing that works? Still, I want to thank all you true believers, for your support during these trying times. It really was heartening the way all of you cheered, applauded, and shook my hand after my speech on accountability, before leaving. On an unhappy note; there was a few dismaying incidents after my speech, where some of the media tried to get me to answer questions. Can you believe these guys, I invite them into my hallowed chamber to listen to my speech on accountability and transparency and they have the cheek to shout and yell questions at me? No more invites for them if they cannot behave when I am at the podium.

The Senate expenses hassle is really a storm in a teacup as are the complaints about a $90,000 check cut to aid a senator friend. Friends always help friends and we did. What is wrong with that? You would think a bank had been robbed with all the publicity this act of kindness is getting. Still, we will soldier on despite all the slings and arrows aimed at our accountable and transparent government. Just look at all the good things we have done. We got two pandas on loan from China and signed a strategic partnership with the communist dictatorship. We sealed the Nexen deal and handed over some of the country’s resources to a Communist State Owned Enterprise. I have always said I am in favour of free enterprise and the free market and this deal proves it! I went to Davos and told all the elites we were going to raise the Old Age security to 67 years of age. I did not do that in parliament first because I wanted to show the big boys, leadership in action. What could be better than that? Still some in the negative media are making a big deal about the $90,000 check, and the, “$3.1 billion missing in anti-terror funds,” that my government can’t locate. Hey, it’s only money and it is in the system somewhere, so what’s the big deal?  As I write this note, in the sky, I am on a high. (did I just make a pun?) I think of all you wonderful true believers out there. No matter how much I suppress your freedom of speech and expression you still do what you are told, and as I mentioned earlier you all gave me a big round of applause after my speech this morning. Some even patted me on the back and shook my hand, before I took off for my plane journey overseas.  What a send off. It was an amazing show of servility and sycophantic subservience, oops I mean support.

No doubt some of the cynical critics are saying, “What a grovelling gang you all are.” I say you are wonderful bunch of supporters who will do and say anything for me. Your loyalty brings tears to my eyes, up here in the sky, hey I am a bit of poet and I did not know it. Just a little bit of levity to coax a smile from you all. Still, I will say this; I hope while I am away creating jobs, prosperity and helping our country’s economy that none of you will speak out of line. Think of me as your example, and do not answer any media questions. Anyway, I have left the “Pit Bull” in charge so he will look after you all. And Gordy the Whip-master can be depended upon to also keep you all in line. And don’t even think about bringing up that pesky abortion issue while I am away. It’s over kaput, dead, just like the 491 dead babies I don’t want to talk about, who survived abortions and were left to die.

Anyway, hopefully the senate scandal will be a dead issue when I get back. If not I may have to prorogue parliament, that should shut them all up. They won’t have a platform if the House is shut down. Then we can all enjoy summer in peace.

Thank you all,
Your Faithful and Accountable Leader.

Stephen J. Gray
May 22, 2013.



Articles of interest at links below:




Saturday, May 18, 2013

The Slaughter,The Killings and The Coverup in Canada






Who would have believed that in the supposedly civilized country of Canada, 491 babies that were born alive after failed killings by abortion were then left to die, or that this atrocity would not even be investigated? Or that those in positions of power, namely the justice system, the leader of the federal government and most of the politicians of all the political parties would remain silent on this appalling heinous criminality? A headline in Postmedia News of January 31, 2013, said this: “Tory backbenchers call on RCMP to investigate late-term abortions, but PM says the debate is closed” the article was written by Tobi Cohen.

In fact, the country’s leader, the right honourable Stephen Harper is quoted in the article as saying this on the monstrous atrocity: "I think all members of this House, whether they agree with it or not, understand that abortion is legal in Canada and this government, myself included, have made it very clear that the government does not intend to change the law in this regard" [1]

 These babies were born alive, after failed killings; therefore, in these 491 cases this isn’t a matter of abortion—it’s a matter of infanticide: and that IS against Canadian law.  Mr. Harper should at least know that difference. Yet, he continues to do nothing about this contravention of the criminal code:

“According to the Criminal Code, a child is considered to be a human being and a person after proceeding fully from the mother's womb, therefore, based on Section 223(2) of the Criminal Code, there should be 491 homicide investigations or prosecutions in connection with these deaths.” [1]

But to date, nothing has been done. These 491 innocents have received no justice and no recognition of their humanity. Yet, a lawless Canada--Canada has no law on abortion--led by PM Stephen Harper is always boasting that they, the Conservatives, are the “party of law and order.” What an abominable disgrace this government is, as are the other political parties in this House of Evil called parliament. 491 babies cry out for justice and only three MPs spoke out to try and right this terrible injustice.

Animals get more respect in this country than human life. One has only to think back to the frenzy and outcry over the slaughtered sled dogs at Whistler [2] to realize that animal lives are more of a priority than innocent tiny humans. Something is deadly wrong in our society today when a mass human killing of this magnitude is covered up, or missed by the mainstream media. One wonders if it had been 491 dogs slaughtered or left to die—would the media have missed or censored the evidence? Based on their reporting on the killing of animals, I don’t believe so.

In fact, many media show their bias in favour of killing by abortion.  Consider an editorial headlined “The Abortion debate is over so shut up” in the Vancouver Province of November 20, 2012, which stated,

“Anti-abortionists need to get this through their skulls: the debate is over and you lost. Women long ago won the right to have control over their bodies, and the choice about whether and when to have children, and Canadians massively support that right. Abortion is not murder, so get over it.” [3]

But it is not only The Province newspaper that shows its bias on the killing by abortionists. Recently, the Canadian Centre for Bioethical Reform sent out a media release entitled “Abortion Face-Off with Stephen Harper.” [4] Which was a postcard distribution in Stephen Harper’s riding. I did not see any media coverage of these postcards from the National Post, The Globe and Mail or the Toronto Star. The CBC did a story but said: “CBC has decided not to use those images.” [5] the images were of Stephen Harper and an aborted baby. Nor did these three newspapers cover the Launch of, “The New Abortion Caravan” [6] in a busy downtown Vancouver location last year.

I believe this lawless atrocity called abortion in Canada shows the culpability of so-called “investigative journalism.” Their coverage of abortion and the crimes of abortionists is mostly limited. They show no pictures of these little innocent victims, except of course if it’s animals--then the slaughter is all over the airwaves, TV stations and the newspapers.  There are a few journalists who have spoken out on the abortion issue, but sadly only a few. Most of the media in Canada covered up these 491 homicides of these little innocents. And thanks to an ongoing cover-up by many powers-that-be, this evil atrocity in Canada continues.

Stephen J. Gray
May 18, 2013.



Note: Definition of Accessory After the Fact:
“Whoever, knowing that an offense has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists any offender in order to hinder or prevent his or her apprehension, trial or punishment, is called an accessory after the fact….” (emphasis added)

Endnotes:







Articles of interest at links below:






Saturday, May 4, 2013

An Open Letter to Kermit Gosnell the Abortionist




Dear Kermit, may I call you Kermit? I have heard you are in a spot of bother for killing babies in your abortion practice. They say you slit the necks of some babies after they were born alive, and that your abortion clinic pipes and toilets were choked with babies’ body parts. I guess you must be feeling very frustrated that you are being discriminated against when others are practically doing the same thing. Anyway, I write this letter to give you some advice: you should come to Canada.  We have no law on abortion, just like China and North Korea and our abortionists are feted and praised in the media. One abortionist has even been called a hero and received Canada’s highest honour, The Order of Canada.

Our Prime Minister, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper has even said, “As long as I am prime minister we are not opening the abortion debate,…” Stephen Harper, quoted in Globe and Mail, April 21, 2011

So you see Kermit, our PM has said there will be no “debate” on abortion; that would be right up your alley as the saying goes. In fact, here, in our civilized country called Canada, our prime minister and most other politicians in our parliament even voted against discussing when human life begins. Don’t you wish you were up here in the great white north practising your profession? But wait Kermit, I have even more information for you on how we treat babies born alive after abortion. There were 491 babies born alive in Canada [1] after abortionists failed to kill them but no charges have been laid. Three Canadian Conservative MPs even wrote the RCMP [2] and asked them to investigate, but so far nothing has been done and the matter appears to be dead, just like the babies left to die after the failed killings. Even Canada’s “investigative media” has mostly ignored these killings. So you see, Kermit, you really should be practicing up here in Canada.  In fact, our prime minister even said this about the 491 homicides:

“‘I think all members of this House, whether they agree with it or not, understand that abortion is legal in Canada and this government, myself included, have made it very clear that the government does not intend to change the law in this regard,’ he said during question period Thursday.” [2]

So there you have it once again Kermit, there is no law on killing babies in Canada; this is a lawless land, and the authorities turn a blind eye to baby killing as witness the 491 babies mentioned earlier. You surely must be saying to yourself, “I must go to Canada, there is no law on killing by abortion and they even give out the country’s highest honour to an abortionist and they have a wonderful dictatorial prime minister and most of the politicians from all the political parties agree that killing by choice is okay.”

Anyway, Kermit, I just wrote this letter to fill you in on the wonderful opportunity awaiting you here in Canada, should you eventually decide to honour us with your presence.  You could slaughter these little innocents here to your heart’s content and no charges will be laid. I will close for now and leave you with these words by an honourable member of parliament to our right honourable Prime Minister:

‘Will the Prime Minister make it clear that he and his government understand that abortion is not murder?’ [3]

Stephen J. Gray
May 4, 2013.



Endnotes:




Articles of interest at links below:

Sunday, April 14, 2013

{Satire} An Imaginary Globalist Speech





Dear Friends, welcome to our annual meeting. There is much to report, so I will start with some recent happenings. That wonderful country Canada has been in the news the last few days. It seems there has been some furor over outsourcing of jobs. One big bank even had its workers training foreign workers before they outsourced some of the bank workers’ jobs. There was quite an outcry about this and many people were upset. Don’t these people realize they now live in a world of globalization and all jobs could soon be up for outsourcing. People have to learn to compete and let the marketplace decide. There is no free lunch and are no free rides. By the way, I would like to thank the leader of Canada for a $60 billion tax break to some of our corporations, [1]  this chap knows the worth of the free market when he sees it. I also liked his speech in Davos [2]where he announced changes to his country’s Old Age Security, raising the age to 67 years, before announcing it in his country’s parliament. Perhaps he realizes our importance in this globalist world?  People should have to work longer for their benefits in this globalist planet. After all, people in some of the poorer countries where we operate, don’t have these kind of benefits. Still, it was nice of him to give us all a heads up in Davos before telling his own people. He would be an asset to any of our multinational corporations and I am sure, should he ever decide to leave politics, there will be a place for him at our corporate globalist table. In fact, he is already on record as saying nice words about us by saying, “We need some semblance of global governance” [3]

Governing any country is not easy; that is why we take pains to advise many governments on how things should be done. That is why our latest plan, the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), has been described as, “the largest trade agreement ever.” And it surely is, though we are keeping much of it secret. [4] Still, most of the politicians have come on board this ship of globalist trade, praising it and saying it will “create jobs.” These are important words to use when explaining the secret TPP. Some cynics are calling it a ship of corporate pirates aiming to plunder, pillage and loot the world in the name of open markets and destroy any benefits some ordinary people have. But hey, competition will be good for all those workers in different countries, all of them merging into a world marketplace in a race for globalist business.  Those outdated customs, like national sovereignty, will die on the altar of Globalism and workers of the world will be merged into one big competing faction for our global business ventures. It will be a dog eat dog world as the saying goes, a wonderful business venture into the globalist utopia where the lowest bidder gets the prize, and I am sure there will be plenty of low bidders from the poorer countries. That is why we need the TPP; bigger profits are the name of the game and we have no shame in admitting to that. (A number of hear, hears are heard and a standing ovation ensues from the assembled globalists.)

Anyway, getting back to that wonderful country Canada, which incidentally has signed on to the TPP, their smart leader even passed legislation that foreign workers coming into his country could be paid 15% less. [5] Still, the Canadian government has an “Economic Action Plan” and perhaps this is a part of it. (A burst of laughter ensues and shouts are heard of “God Bless the Tories”)  As expected, many of our corporate friends in that country jumped on this free enterprise band wagon and took advantage of this wonderful gift of paying workers less. Of course there was much criticism of this. But one of our stalwart financial columnists, who can always be depended on to come to our aid, called the criticism of outsourcing hysteria from the left and as usual was a pillar of support for us all. Perhaps someday he will get a seat in the Senate for his defence of outsourcing and free enterprise!

Free enterprise is the engine that will kick start the world economy. There will be no more bailouts for the banks. Just a “bail in” [6] from the stiffs, oops I mean depositors monies should some extra cash be needed to prop up the monetary system.  All in all things are hunky dory for us globalists and the politicians accede, to all our demands oops I mean suggestions. I will close with some famous words: “The world is ours comrades and all that’s in it.” So let us move forward and continue to profit from our globalization.
(A standing ovation ensues and many shouts of “three cheers for the New World Order” are heard.)

Stephen J. Gray
April 14, 2013.


Endnotes:












Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Does the “Secretive” Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Undermine National Sovereignty?




“The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multi-national trade agreement that threatens to extend restrictive intellectual property (IP) laws across the globe and rewrite international rules on its enforcement….TPP raises significant concerns about citizens’ freedom of expression, due process, innovation, the future of the Internet’s global infrastructure, and the right of sovereign nations to develop policies and laws that best meet their domestic priorities.” [1]

Surely, the “domestic priorities” of any country should be the welfare of its people. Yet, there are numerous articles available that state the TPP is a danger to national sovereignty and is being negotiated in secret. One has to ask the question: If it is such a good deal, why all the secrecy?
Still they have a way of making these deals sound nice and palatable, using words like “partnership” and in the USA ,Canada and Mexico deal “integration” is the word used, as is, “beyond borders” [2] all designed to baffle and fool the masses into believing that this is all for their benefit. The nice sounding language is thought up by their “strategists” and “marketing experts” of the corporate world some of whom work for multi-national corporate strategy firms. You can see some of these “experts” and “strategists” on political shows on TV giggling, sniggering, laughing and talking with the host as they spread their BS across the land. Government is a great source of tax-payers dollars and a profitable business for some of these propagandists. Manipulating the masses is the name of the political game and national sovereignty is easily dismissed.

“Member countries will sacrifice national sovereignty. Their laws, regulations and rights will be subordinated to TPP rules….” [3]

Who is behind these “rules” that will “sacrifice national sovereignty?”

“The Trans-Pacific Partnership is also expected to grant banks and other transnational corporations the power to challenge any laws, regulations and even court decisions that they believe violate the FTA through international tribunals that circumvent domestic judicial systems. Under these “regulatory takings” cases, countries would be forced to change their policies and/or pay stiff penalties to the aggrieved corporations.” [4]

One has to ask will supposedly free peoples allow these multi-national corporate elites to takeover their countries, and why are the puppet politicians involved in these “secret negotiations that could endanger national sovereignty?  Could this be called political treason? Or is the subterfuge described as “creating jobs?”

 Lost jobs have been in the news lately where employees at the Royal Bank of Canada {RBC) are to be replaced by foreign workers and in some cases: “The new people are in our offices and we are training them to do our jobs. That adds insult to injury.”
And according to another news report other banks are doing the same thing.
But it is not only banks that are bringing in foreign workers. A mining company in B.C is also bringing in Chinese workers.

The above information is just some examples of what is happening inside our country today. Still, the Harper government has formed a “strategic partnership” [5] with the communist government of China. Therefore one wonders does “strategic partnership” include that country’s workers?

Could the examples shown above be a template for what is to come when this “secretive” TPP comes into being. Will ordinary people be herded like cattle into accepting the conditions of multi-national corporations? Will all the health and safety standard go out the window? Will pension plans and old age security become a thing of the past? Will lower wages be the norm as people from all these different and some poorer countries “compete” for a slice of the corporate pie? Still, the politicians who make all these deals will be okay. When they leave public office some of them finish up on corporate boards. They have big pensions courtesy of the taxpayers, and the taxpayers are left holding the empty bag if their economies are looted in the name of “free enterprise” and “strategic partnerships.” Still, let the corporate “marketplace” decide and to hell with national sovereignty seems to be the plan aided and abetted by puppet politicians.

Stephen J. Gray
April 10, 2013.


Endnotes:






More info at links below: