Celebrating a Killing Decision

Note: The article below was written in 2008

“…we celebrate the Supreme Court decision,…”

Judy Rebick, National Post, January 26, 2008

The Supreme Court of Canada brought down a judgement in 1988 that took abortion out of the criminal code. Canada now has no law on abortion, and we now have unrestrained killing. Over 100,000 lives are slaughtered yearly in the name of “choice.” Ms. Rebick in her National Post column stated: “Ninety per cent of abortions in Canada take place in the first 12 weeks.” There is a picture of an 8 week human life torn apart by abortion at: http://www.AbortionNo.org  where one can see the butchered body of this tiny human. This is a cause for “celebration” in Canada? Surely, something is seriously wrong in a supposedly “civilized” country that we would even allow this type of barbarism?

There were a number of articles on abortion by various writers in the  National Post during the week of January 21 to 28,  while it was interesting to read this debate on state sanctioned  killing, I believe, there was evidence lacking  in the Post’s coverage. For example, in most mainstream media we get pictures of the victims in wars and the atrocities perpetrated on them, the middle east is but one example. The holocaust is another.  In the coverage of the killing by abortion we do not get to see the dismembered victims in the media. Why is this? “A picture is worth a thousand words” as the saying goes. And this week in the National Post we had no pictures. Let the people see the gory pictures of the little innocent victims carved up and cut to pieces by abortion. Then go and interview Ms. Rebick  and have her explain the dismembered bodies of  these little innocents under “12 weeks” who have been butchered. Below are the methods used in  this “celebration” of killing.

 

Source for the following information on abortion methods is: http://www.lifesitenews.com/abortiontypes/ 

Suction Aspiration
This is the most common method of abortion during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. General or local anaesthesia is given to the mother and her cervix is quickly dilated. A suction curette (hollow tube with a knife-edged tip) is inserted into the womb. This instrument is then connected to a vacuum machine by a transparent tube. The vacuum suction, 29 times more powerful than a household vacuum cleaner, tears the fetus and placenta into small pieces which are sucked through the tube into a bottle and discarded.

Dilation and Curettage (D&C)
This method is similar to the suction method with the added insertion of a hook shaped knife (curette) which cuts the baby into pieces. The pieces are scraped out through the cervix and discarded [Note: This abortion method should not be confused with a therapeutic D&C done for reasons other than pregnancy.]
….
Dilation and Evacuation (D&E)
This method is used up to 18 weeks' gestation. Instead of the loop-shaped knife used in D&C abortions, a pair of forceps is inserted into the womb to grasp part of the fetus. The teeth of the forceps twist and tear the bones of the unborn child. This process is repeated until the fetus is totally dismembered and removed. Usually the spine must be snapped and the skull crushed in order to remove them.

Salt Poisoning (Saline Injection):
Used after 16 weeks (four months) when enough fluid has accumulated. A long needle injects a strong salt solution through the mother's abdomen into the baby's sac. The baby swallows this fluid and is poisoned by it. It also acts as a corrosive, burning off the outer layer of skin. It normally takes somewhat over an hour for the baby to die from this. Within 24 hours, labor will usually set in and the mother will give birth to a dead or dying baby. (There have been many cases of these babies being born alive. They are usually left unattended to die. However, a few have survived and later been adopted.)
…
Prostaglandin Chemical Abortion:
This form of abortion uses chemicals developed by the Upjohn Pharmaceutical Co. which cause the uterus to contract intensely, pushing out the developing baby. The contractions are more violent than normal, natural contractions, so the unborn baby is frequently killed by them -- some have even been decapitated. Many, however, have also been born alive.
…
Five steps to a partial birth abortion:
1) Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby's legs with forceps.
2) The baby's leg is pulled out into the birth canal.
3) The abortionist delivers the baby's entire body, except for the head
4) The abortionist jams scissors into the baby's skull. The scissors are then opened to enlarge the skull.
5) The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child's brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.

[End of procedure descriptions as provided by aforementioned link.]

Most people are horrified when they see pictures on television of baby seals being clubbed to death and the ice flows running red with their blood. Warnings are issued on TV before showing the pictures and we are told the images are gruesome. Imagine if these same TV cameras or if the National Post took us inside a local abortuary where babies are slaughtered, suctioned out, poisoned by a saline solution or in some cases born alive and left to die. Then published the pictures!  The people would be able to see this grisly “procedure” performed by abortionists. The light would at last be shone on this atrocity called “choice,” and one wonders, would it still be a cause for “celebration?”

Stephen J. Gray

January 28, 2008

The Gangsters in Pin Striped Suits

Have you seen the gangsters in pin striped suits?

They are today’s “respected” financial crooks

The standard bearers of “free market” capitalism

Have also been known to finance terrorism

These financial terrorists can’t go to jail

If they did, we are told, the system would fail

So says a respected financial regulator

There might be a run on these money creators

The banksters did pay some large fines

Which they will recoup from their monetary goldmines

They also manipulated and rigged the Libor rates

And the people will pay for their monetary dictates

The financial criminals are well “respected”

They advise some governments which are elected

They even finance election campaigns

Is corruption the name of the political “game?”

But hey, you Serfs, don’t forget to vote

Just place your X and they’ll take note

Then you get punished for participating in “democracy”

But, you supported this election “game” of hypocrisy

Still, don’t worry the money changers are in control

And to them, the puppet politicians have sold their souls

The monetary villains are laughing at society

There is no jail time for them or anxiety

They launder drug money for criminal cartels

Justice is dead and blind and all is well

Who cares if the results are killings and drug addiction

Are these financial bandits a curse and an affliction?

The world has been captured by financial con men

They have corrupted the system with word and pen

They are gorging themselves on monetary loot

These are the gangsters in pin striped suits

Stephen J. Gray

January 27, 2013.

Articles of interest at links below:

 http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/12/are-we-seeing-institutionalized.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/07/is-there-worldwide-conspiracy-in.html

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2012/12/banks-are-where-money-drug-war

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/07/16/hsbc-helped-terrorists-iran-mexican-drug-cartels-launder-money-senate-report-says/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/video/2012/jul/18/hsbc-laundering-drug-terrorists-video

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/2383-congress-probes-dea-drug-money-laundering-scheme

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/bank-of-america-too-crooked-to-fail-20120314

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/12247-cia-%E2%80%9Cmanages%E2%80%9D-drug-trade-mexican-official-says

A Satire: For Immediate Release: Class Action Suit Launched By Mob Families

We the legitimate crime families of the underworld are today launching this class action suit against the authorities.  It has come to our notice that certain banks and financial institutions have been engaged in money laundering and financing terrorism. None of these treasonous money launderers have gone to jail. Instead, they are still pursuing their careers in the financial world. Some of them have been known to advise governments and even finance election campaigns.  Something is very rotten in the system of justice when the aforementioned financial criminals can flaunt their freedom to loot, pillage and plunder.

Meanwhile, honest criminals in our mob families have done jail time and some are still in jail in maximum security prisons for the same offences of these “respectable bankers” who are still free. What is going on, we have to ask? Whatever happened to the level playing field and all being equal under the law? Have those in charge become the real  “mob family”? Are honest criminals now subject to discrimination? Does the government show favour to financial criminals, too powerful to go to jail? Has the government become corrupted? 

We respectfully ask these questions and hope someone in authority will answer our concerns. In the meantime, this mob family are launching this class action suit for Two Billion Dollars for unfair prison sentences, unfair drug convictions, and unfair discrimination. After all, if “respectable” financial criminals do not go to jail, why should members of our Mob Families be incarcerated?

Yours very truly,

Spokesperson and honest criminal and head Mob Boss presently residing in a maximum security prison for drug offences and money laundering.

Stephen J. Gray

January 5, 2013.

Articles of interest at links below:

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2012/12/banks-are-where-money-drug-war

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/07/16/hsbc-helped-terrorists-iran-mexican-drug-cartels-launder-money-senate-report-says/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/video/2012/jul/18/hsbc-laundering-drug-terrorists-video

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/2383-congress-probes-dea-drug-money-laundering-scheme

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/bank-of-america-too-crooked-to-fail-20120314

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/12247-cia-%E2%80%9Cmanages%E2%80%9D-drug-trade-mexican-official-says

They Sell Out Their Countries

They sell out their countries in broad daylight

They are the political puppets of left and right

Bought and paid for by the One World elite

The treasonous politicians grovel at their masters feet

Open treason is sold as “global governance”

And the corporate media acclaim their performance

The people are treated as serfs to be lied to

Manipulated and conditioned and told what to do

Treachery is marketed by the public relations “experts”

It’s really all about “security and jobs” they tell the serfs

The system has been hijacked under the banner of “democracy”

It is now controlled by the money changing plutocracy

Thieving and lying has become “legitimate”

If you dare speak out you are a “conspiracy twit”

Something very evil is in control

And many “leaders” have sold their souls

Treacherous elites dictate world policy

But many people believe they still have “democracy”

The money changers were kicked out of the temple

Now they rule the world like Lucifer’s “angels”

Financiers of misery, corruption and wars

These are the planet’s money changing whores

Controllers of the world’s money systems

They also have been known to finance drugs and terrorism

Where will it end? Can this evil survive?

Will it result in nobody left alive?

Will it be the end of all the world’s worries?

Will this be the payment for the sell-out of countries?

Stephen J. Gray

January 1, 2013.

Articles of interest at links below:

http://globalistagenda.org/who.htm

http://globalistagenda.org/

http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/12/are-we-seeing-institutionalized.html

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/07/16/hsbc-helped-terrorists-iran-mexican-drug-cartels-launder-money-senate-report-says/

http://globalistagenda.org/finance.htm

http://globalistagenda.org/quotes.htm

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Trading_Enemy_excerpts.html

The Word Soldiers

The most powerful soldiers in the country today are the word soldiers. These soldiers can mow down any opposition, win every battle and put the enemy to flight. When they go on the attack most everyone runs for cover. Who are these word soldiers? They are the media army always ready to suppress opinions they do not like. The minute anyone steps out of line and opposes their propaganda, their metaphor missiles take deadly aim. They never miss their targets for they have endless supplies of word ammunition and have launching platforms for their messages to suppress views they do not like.

These soldiers of the media army are in the T.V newsrooms, The Radio Stations and The Newspapers. They are always at the ready. Whenever the normal people attack media approved doctrines such as unnatural lifestyles, the killing of the child in the womb, "legalizing" same-sex marriage, or other media approved nonsense, the big guns of the word soldiers go into action. They take no prisoners. They are the media army of the politically correct. Many of the people of the land—constantly bombarded with their heavy artillery words—have been brainwashed into submission. Many people, after surrendering, buy the word soldiers propaganda sheets and listen to them on the broadcasting networks.

The word soldiers can also be heard on discussion panels around the land, interviewing each other on politically correct issues and disseminating their "wisdom" to the watching and listening masses. One such media outlet, the Collective Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) is well known for its battalions of word soldiers. You can be sure in this war against truth, the CBC will be in the front line, as will Communal Television (CTV) and Glow-Bull Television (GTV.)  All the news soldiers of the media army are efficient in word assassination. Propaganda wins in any war and the word soldiers are constantly at war, shutting down or ridiculing opposing voices.

The word soldiers spring into immediate action whenever there is an exposure of the  politically correct media agenda. When an emergency occurs the media word troops are parachuted into action. The fiery attack words come in waves: "bigot," "homophobic," "bile," "disgusting," "lunatic," "neanderthal," "extreme," "outrageous," "beyond the pale," “hypocrite,” “loony-tune,"  "repugnant beliefs," “nutbar”—the word weaponry is awesome to behold. Every epithet in the media arsenal is sometimes used to take down any dissident who contradicts or criticizes the media-approved message. The victims surrender, riddled with word bullets, and some retreat into silence never again to raise their voice.  Very few can stand up to this propaganda firepower. The word soldiers of the media army take no prisoners in their battle for word control and propaganda supremacy, and some even get medals for being the “best” in the media world of word soldiers.

Stephen J. Gray

December 29, 2012.

Links to articles of interest below:

http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/nvp/media/shaw1.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/12/491-murders-that-mainstream-media.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/07/pro-abortion-trade-unions-and-their.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/05/do-you-still-buy-newspapers.html

http://blogs.theprovince.com/2012/11/20/editorial-the-abortion-debate-is-over-so-shut-up/

Are We Seeing Institutionalized Corruption and Treachery?

“The largest banks have become too big to prosecute because of the impact criminal charges would have on confidence in them, Britain’s most senior bank regulator has admitted.” [8] Harry Wilson, Telegraph U.K., December 14, 2012.

Financial Corruption:

The financial system has been pillaged and looted by financial criminals and none have gone to jail. In the Libor “racket” [1] some of them have paid large fines and continue to operate in the financial world. Other financial institutions have been involved in laundering drug money and financing terrorism [2] but still no jail time ensues. Many banks have been bailed out with taxpayers’ dollars, and many taxpayers have lost their homes their jobs and seen their pension funds and their savings go into the dumpster (no bailouts for them) because of the financial banditry by these monetary reprobates.  Some of these monetary manipulators have been known to advise governments, and goofy governments take their advice and impose austerity on their own people.

The people of Greece, Ireland, and other countries are subjected to austerity imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which in turn is financed by the taxpayers’ dollars of various countries. Was there ever a sweeter set up than this kind of system where taxpayers who pay the wages of the IMF cabal are punished by this same crony cabal of pin striped suited bankers?’ If it wasn’t so ridiculous it would be laughable, but unfortunately it is no joke. The jokers in charge are the money changers who wage monetary war in the name of austerity.

The War Business Corruption:

“First, the [Libyan] war is illegal under the United States constitution and our War Powers Act, because only the US Congress has the authority to declare war and the president has been unable to show that the US faced an imminent threat from Libya.” -Dennis Kucinich, American Congressman, writing in the Guardian U.K Newspaper July 6, 2011.

Illegal wars are started under the slogans of “humanitarian missions” and “responsibility to protect.” A country is laid waste and men women and children are slaughtered in the name of “bringing democracy,” and the end result is a civil war. Dictators are propped up and supplied with weapons to terrorize their own people by the friendly politicians [3] in the western “democracies.”

The Ottawa Citizen of April 23, 2011 had this headline: “DND reports reveal Canada's ties with Gadhafi.”  The article went on to say, “Western politicians have labelled Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi a despot and a brutal dictator, but Defence Department reports portray him in another way--as a staunch ally in the war against al-Qaeda and Islamic extremism.”

Still, the time had come to replace the dictator, who formerly was their friend and “staunch ally” so the “good guys” teamed up with their supposed enemy, the bad guys [4], and bombed Libya back to the dark ages. [5] But hey, these are the “good guys” in partnership with the bad guys and if they kill innocent children [6] in the process they can always apologise. So what is really going on? First the “good guys” supply the dictator with weapons then they unseat him in partnership with a supposed enemy. Now the Al- Qaeda flag is flying over Libya, [7] and nobody is held accountable for the horrific mess. Though one courageous politician did have the courage to speak out:

“A US lawmaker fiercely opposed to NATO’s role in the Libya conflict called Tuesday for the alliance’s military chiefs to be held to account under international law for the deaths of Libyan civilians.

“Otherwise we will have witnessed the triumph of a new international gangsterism,” Democratic Representative Dennis Kucinich, a leading opponent in the US Congress to Washington’s role in the fighting, said in a statement.” [7a]

Political Treachery?

Are we seeing political treachery being enacted? Can the people of any country have confidence in a government that does not obey the will of the people?

Example: The people of Ireland voted No to joining the European Union. This vote was not acceptable to the elites and the people of Ireland were subjected to another vote that culminated in a Yes vote. Therefore, one has to ask: Why was the No vote unacceptable? Were there other forces behind the scenes determined to subvert democracy and did they succeed? And could one call this abrogation of the original No vote, a case of political treason?

Another example: Some countries now in the European Union never asked their citizens whether they wanted to join. In fact, “Bloomberg Business Week” of June 13, 2008, stated, “Ireland is the only country in Europe to hold a referendum on the treaty.” Now in the E.U. national sovereignty has been surrendered to technocrats, bureaucrats, bankers and the unelected. The Euro Observer of December 9, 2011 stated, “…almost all fiscal policy-making would be taken out of the hands of national assemblies and delivered up to European civil servants.” The people are being betrayed by their puppet political “leaders.” Democracy has been ditched and I believe political treason abounds.

We also see “free trade” deals being negotiated between countries in secret. The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) [9] is one “secret” deal and there are others. Parliaments are being bypassed and I believe national sovereignty surrendered. [9A] A deal is signed with a communist dictatorship [10] and “free enterprise” capitalists’ consort with communists as do many politicians. [11] Ethics, principle, morality and human rights are tossed aside in the race for bloodstained profits. There are many more examples that could be quoted about the treachery I believe is being enacted today. I have only shown a few. In closing one has to ask, are we seeing institutionalized corruption and treachery?

Stephen J. Gray

December 22, 2012.

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9756791/How-UBS-built-its-Libor-racket.html

[2] http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/07/16/hsbc-helped-terrorists-iran-mexican-drug-cartels-launder-money-senate-report-says/

[3] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2011/03/political-hypocrites-who-sell-arms-to.html

[4] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2011/09/do-friends-of-libya-include-al-qaeda.html

[5] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2049108/Libya-wars-stand-Sirte-Pictures-city-shelled-smithereens.html

[6] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3Zt18n_Fwo

[7] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OywA0ry610http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OywA0ry610

[7a] http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/23/congressman-kucinich-nato-must-account-for-libyan-deaths/

[8] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9743839/Banks-are-too-big-to-prosecute-says-FSAs-Andrew-Bailey.html

[9] http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1299311--secrecy-the-standard-as-canada-enters-trans-pacific-partnership-talks-geist

[9A] http://www.prisonplanet.com/stealth-corporate-coup-detat.html

[10] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/10/are-communism-and-capitalism-partners.html  

[11] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/02/consorting-with-communists.html

Are They Armchair Assassins?

They watch computer screens in cozy armchairs

Are they Armchair Assassins in their secure lairs?

Are they operators of death and destruction?

Are they “legalized” hitmen? Do they have no compunction?

Some of their “work” hours are nine to five

They press their buttons and bring death to the alive

Sometimes they kill children, “but it’s all a mistake”

An apology will be issued for any “errors” they make

Collateral damage is the deceptive words used

When innocents are slaughtered and murdered too

Some even call this “responsibility to protect”

Then they praise this hellish and sick effect

But hey, these are the “good guys,’’ do they sanction murder?

Where is the law? Are we seeing a disorder?

Is there no respect for life, and human decency?

Can killing be “legitimized” instead of being an obscenity?

 Is something very wrong in this world today?

Can authorized killing be legal anyway?

No pleas, No trials, No laws, No courts of justice

Can an illegal death sentence be totally callous?

Do we have “official” terrorists: name calling terrorists?

Has murder been incorporated amongst the “best” of us?

We all better think and perhaps beware

Are there state approved assassins in comfortable armchairs?

Stephen J. Gray

December 15,2012.

Articles of interest:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/pain-continues-after-war-for-american-drone-pilot-a-872726.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8695679/168-children-killed-in-drone-strikes-in-Pakistan-since-start-of-campaign.html

http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/us-drone-strikes-violate-the-sanctity-of-life/Content?oid=4222121

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/british-intelligence-officers-accused-of-murder-over-drone-attacks-in-pakistan-8223399.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/drone-attacks-are-acts-of-terrorism-168-children-killed-in-america-s-drone-war-in-pakistan-photographic-evidence/30603   

A Christmas Present to Chinese Communists

“Canada approved China's biggest overseas energy acquisition, a $15.1 billion takeover by state-owned CNOOC of Canadian oil and gas producer Nexen…” [4]  CBS News, December 7, 2012

Hello Canadians!  Were you impressed by PM Stephen Harper’s early Christmas present to a State Owned Enterprise (SOE) of Communist China? Do you feel good about part of your country being given away and then described as a “net benefit” to Canada? Has anybody seen the definition of “net benefit” explained? Do we have to ask the Chinese to “explain” the “deal” as our Industry Minister told us to? [1] Were you impressed seeing Stephen Harper at a news conference podium, inscribed with the words “A STRONG CANADA”? Did you wonder how our country can be “strong” if we allow some of our resources to be owned by a communist dictatorship? Is that not a sign of being ethically challenged and morally weak? Still, “A STRONG CANADA” is an excellent marketing slogan and no doubt most of the media fell for it. I did not hear any of them asking how our land can be “strong” if we surrender our resources without debate in parliament and ignore the people of this country, who according to a poll were “73%” opposed. [2] Still, we are told we live in a “democracy.” But are we seeing hypocrisy? PM Stephen Harper is on record as saying this:

"I don't think Canadians want us to sell out important Canadian values -- our belief in democracy, freedom, human rights. They don't want us to sell that out to the almighty dollar.'' -- Stephen Harper talking about relations with China in 2006 [3]

Then just the other day Stephen Harper says this:

"To be blunt, Canadians have not spent years reducing ownership of sectors of the economy by our own governments only to see them bought and controlled by foreign governments instead.”[4]

Is our great leader confused? He just approved a part of our country to be “bought and controlled” by a “foreign” communist government. Still, he did say, “the [Harper] government would only consider future takeover deals in the oil sands by state-owned companies in exceptional circumstances.” [4] Gee, it gets curiouser and curiouser here in Tory Wonderland. I wonder, what does “exceptional circumstances” mean? But hey, in Tory Wonderland words can mean anything you want them to mean. It could be called a BS marketing ploy or an attempt to baffle the people. Just make the words sound good and all will be well. And it was. In fact, I heard a media panel on a political show say they were in agreement with the communist SOE deal (as are most other corporate mainstream media as well). Maybe this media “scrum” was competing for an Order of Canada award or a Senate seat.  Just kidding, but who knows?

Anyway, the “deal” is done and none of the “conservative” MPs spoke out on opposition to this handover to a bloodthirsty communist regime, though one keeps hearing some were against it. One would have thought they would have had the moral courage to speak out and oppose it and the undemocratic way it was done: No debate in parliament and no public consultation. How can these “conservative” MPs look in the mirror at their own faces without being disgusted with themselves? Does allegiance to Mr. Harper mean more to them than allegiance to their country’s democratic tradition?  Still, it is the season of goodwill and giving, and I believe the Harper “conservatives” gave the Chinese Communists a Christmas present from Canada by approving the communist SOE deal. But, cheer up everybody: we are getting two Pandas on loan so that should be a “net benefit” to us all. So Merry Christmas Canada!

Stephen J. Gray

December11, 2012.

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/paradis-says-it-s-now-up-to-china-to-explain-deal-to-canadians-1.1072194

[2] http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2012/12/almost-nobody-likes-the-nexen-deal-december-7-2012/

[3] http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/12/08/Nexen-Harper/

[4] http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34227_162-57557952/canada-oks-chinas-largest-soverseas-energy-acquisition/

Article of interest:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/02/11/harper-china-saturday.html

A CPC Comrade’s Letter to the CPC of Canada Hurrah! Our SOE Passed the “Net Benefit” Test (Satire) By Stephen J. Gray

Dear Comrades of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). This is my second letter to you. [1] How are things in Panda Land? Panda-ring well I hope. Hey, just a silly pun on our loan of two pandas to you; anyway, on to my reason for writing.

As a good communist of the Communist Party of China (CPC) and supporter of our State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), I wish to thank you for approving one of our SOEs.  I hear it passed your “net benefit” test with flying red colours. We are so grateful in the communist party that your great leader and Chairman did allow some of your country’s resources into our hands. I liked the way he did it, without any input by the people or your parliament. We operate the same way in our Politburo so our “strategic partnership” should be beneficial to all the elites concerned. I would also like to thank the business leaders and many of your media propagandists in your country who supported this deal between capitalism and communism. One clever fellow even said it was “no big deal.” He obviously appreciates how we run our country.

Many of these people would make good communists. In fact your media propagandists, just like our state-owned media, are quite similar in many ways. Ownership is in a few hands and they parrot some of the same views we do. I especially like your Irrational Post, the Glib and Mail, and the Red Star. I hope I got their names correct; if not I sincerely apologise.  I believe that old saying is very true: “birds of a feather flock together”—though we are not birds, but all comrades together bound by our common greed; pardon me, I mean need. We need your resources and you need our communist money. Some people say “bloodstained money is the root of all evil” but they are just losers who do not like imposed order. In an ordered society the masses must be ruled with an iron fist and your Chairman, just like our famous Chairman Mao, does not allow dissent in his party. Nor does he like it in his country.

I know there are some in your country who babble on about the lack of human rights in my country and the use of torture, slave labour and forced abortions, as well as our one child policy. But it is no good the kettle calling the pot black, as the saying goes. You also have your ugly side. There was an article that said about your country, “Canada’s official statistics agency has confirmed that 491 babies died after they were born alive during abortions…” [2] And your country even gave its highest award to an abortionist. In fact, your country does not even wish to discuss “when human life begins.” And your great leader and Chairman voted against finding out when life begins. He obviously prefers to be ignorant rather than informed. But hey, great leaders are allowed to be ignorant; that’s why leaders are great. Still, the people need to be re-educated on the facts of life, and that wisdom always comes from the great Chairman. Politics and business are above the concerns of the masses, and monetary power and political power go hand in hand. Ethics, principles, morality and human rights have no place in a “net benefit” test, that’s why we have re-education camps in our country.

Now that we are going to be firmly ensconced in your country we could help your great leader and Chairman set up some re-education camps if he so wishes.  After all, he did at one time criticize us, but did see the error of his ways, so obviously he had a great conversion to our system and now we are classed as a “friend” and “ally.” So you see, villains can become virtuous if the right propaganda, oops I mean attempts, are made to give them respect. Does that make sense?  Anyway, it doesn’t really matter we are all in bed together now, a ménage a trois of politicians, Big Business, and Media. A threesome of communism, capitalism and propaganda joined together to support and promote each other in a world of hypocrisy and deceit.  I hope I am coming across like a true communist. Or as one of your respected business leaders once said, “now we can get down to business.”

In closing, I must say I am very impressed with most of your propagandists; pardon me, I believe you call them journalists. Most of them promoted our State Owned Enterprise (SOE) having access to your resources. In fact, one journalist inferred that those who opposed it were hypocrites. This is the kind of rhetoric we like to use in the communist party against those who dissent. It is gratifying to see your propagandists act the same way. This is very good and helps to confuse the reality of what is really going on: our takeover of some of your resources and part of your country. As I said earlier, many of your promoters of our SOEs would make good communists. And as good communists we censor the internet in our country. I see it has been reported in your country that you are also trying to censor information:

“NDP MP Charlie Angus said it is disturbing the government is forcing internet companies to remove content, saying it is the kind of thing usually done by authoritarian regimes.” [3]

Anyway, as the season of goodwill and happy holidays approaches, this Comrade of the CPC wishes the Comrades of the CPC in Canada a Happy Comrades Season. The same applies to your Big Business Comrades and your media propagandists. May we all prosper in our “strategic partnership” and perhaps our countries some day could merge and become one big State Owned Enterprise (SOE).  We could call it CanChin or ChinCan; anyway, that is just a thought. But who knows what may happen down this “strategic partnership” road.

Yours in Solidarity: A CPC comrade.

Stephen J. Gray

December 7,2012.

 Previous Correspondence between Comrades at link below

[1] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2011/07/imaginary-letter-of-thanks-from-cpc-to.html

Endnotes:

[2] http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/491-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-left-to-die-in-canada-statscan

[3] http://www.ipolitics.ca/2012/11/23/harper-government-requests-to-wipe-content-off-the-web-on-the-rise/ 

Articles of interest at links below:

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/canada/cnooc-security-arrest-falun-gong-adherents-302266.html

http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/stephen-harper-plans-china-trip-to-strengthen-ties/article2126005/?service=mobile

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220591/The-cruel-truth-Chinas-panda-factories.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/02/11/harper-china-saturday.html

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/china-news/evidence-that-wife-of-disgraced-official-traded-in-bodies-group-says-316524.html

491 Murders that the Mainstream Media Ignored

“Pro-life advocates are calling for a federal investigation after Canada’s official statistics agency has confirmed that 491 babies died after they were born alive during abortions between 2000 and 2009.” [1] Lifesite News, Patrick B. Crane, November 28, 2012.

One would have thought the so-called “investigative media” would have been all over this story and that it would have been headline news. Still, Canada’s media have been busy lately writing about the sled dogs slaughter and the sentencing of the dogs’ killer. Granted, the dog story is an important issue, but surely the slaughter and killing of 491 innocent human lives by abortionists is worthy of publicity also? But no, sadly the killing of these tiny humans did not rate a mention by the mainstream media’s written word or TV news.

Something is deadly wrong in our society today when a mass killing of this magnitude is covered up, or missed by the mainstream media. One wonders if it had been 491 dogs slaughtered or left to die—would the media have missed the story then? Based on their reporting on the killing of animals I don’t believe so. In fact, many media show their bias in favour of abortion.  Consider an editorial headlined “The Abortion debate is over so shut up” in Vancouver Province of November 20, 2012, which stated,

“Anti-abortionists need to get this through their skulls: the debate is over and you lost. Women long ago won the right to have control over their bodies, and the choice about whether and when to have children, and Canadians massively support that right. Abortion is not murder, so get over it. [2]

Oh really? I wonder what the Province editorialists think about the 491 babies who survived abortion but were left to die. But hey, the Province tells us, “Abortion is not murder, so get over it.” Perhaps that is why the story of the 491 babies who survived abortion is not headlines in the Province newspaper.

I believe if we had any ethics in this country, we would stop pretending that killing by “choice” is okay. We would call this abominable word “abortion” what it really is, the suctioning out, the cutting up, and the carving to pieces of innocent human lives. The gory killings would have to be shown by our so-called “investigative media" instead of them covering up the evidence.  The medical butchers would be put on trial. So one has to ask why there has been no homicide charges laid against those who committed the atrocities against the 491 innocent human lives.

Stephen J. Gray

December 1, 2012.

 Endnotes:

[1] http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/491-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-left-to-die-in-canada-statscan

[2] http://blogs.theprovince.com/2012/11/20/editorial-the-abortion-debate-is-over-so-shut-up/

Some examples below on the media mass coverage of the sled dogs killings:

http://www.theprovince.com/sports/jail+killed+sled+dogs/7599786/story.html#axzz2DjKp1P00

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Sled+dogs+killed+Whistler+slaughter+buried+near+Penticton/7489636/story.html#axzz2DjKp1P00

http://www.theprovince.com/news/SPCA+slams+light+sentence+sled+killer/7594947/story.html#axzz2DjKp1P00

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1291826--gasps-as-court-hears-gory-details-of-sled-dogs-deaths

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/22/gory-death-details-heard-at-sentencing-for-man-who-killed-sled-dogs-in-b-c/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/fawcett-spared-jail-time-in-sentencing-related-to-sled-dog-killings/article5566662/ 

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/b-c-man-gets-probation-for-sled-dog-slaughter-1.1048840

The “rock star” Banker

The headlines said a “rock star” banker was leaving

The media went into a frenzy the country was supposedly grieving

Oh, who will save us now, was the noisy media cry

Their “rock star” banker would soon be saying goodbye

He was going to jolly old Blighty, to save it from its troubles

Even though some say it was bankers that caused the financial bubble

But hey, the banking “rock star” will surely be a wow

But what will happen to his old bank, can anyone help them now?

There is always help available, another money printer will arrive

And when the “rock star” leaves: the bank will still survive

Bankers do not suffer austerity or any wear and tear

As long as there are servile taxpayers here and everywhere

The taxpayers bailed out the manipulative Libor-raters

Now they are preaching austerity these financial operators

But don’t worry, a banking “rock star” will take control

As people everywhere sink deeper into a big financial hole

Still, lighten up all you worried serfs as you lose your “best and brightest”

There is always another banking “rock star” amongst Goldman’s finest

Bankers rule this world of ours, that’s why we are all in debt

The money printers are in charge, do we really have a “rock star” asset?

Stephen J. Gray

November 28,2012.

Articles of interest:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/goldman-sachs-completes-economic-takeover-of-europe.html

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/meet-35-foreign-banks-got-bailed-out-fed-and-just-cpff-banks

http://mises.ca/posts/blog/the-canadian-bank-bailout/

Is Society Terrified of the Truth?

“A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” -John F. Kennedy

The truth of the humanity of the pre-born child in Canada continues to be undermined, suppressed and twisted by so-called educated and intelligent people. An article by Charlie Gillis of MacLeans of November 14, 2012 stated,

“The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada is seldom at a loss for words. But even Beverley McLachlin stopped in her verbal tracks last month while hearing arguments in the matter of Regina v. Ivana Levkovic….Levkovic, a former stripper from Mississauga, Ont., was accused of leaving the body of her newborn daughter on her apartment balcony, to be found—badly decomposed in a plastic bag—by her landlord when she vacated.” [1]

According to the article, the judges hearing the case were having difficulty finding the “right words” to describe the little human victim. The article goes on to say this about the judicial language:

“Thus began a kind of linguistic minuet, as the judges reached for acceptable nomenclature for a hypothetical baby that the law might not regard as a person. McLachlin tried ‘object’ and ‘being’ and, at one cringeworthy point, referred to it as ‘this, um, dead, um, whatever.’ Her colleagues didn’t fare much better. During a discussion of the applicability of mens rea, Justice Michael Moldaver, a former criminal lawyer who joined the court one year ago, referred to the infant in such cases as ‘the thing.’”[1]

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” -George Orwell

This is where the disrespect for human life has led us. A human life is described as ‘the thing.’ Still, one should not be surprised at the weasel words being used by judges and others to describe an innocent little human life. The truth in Canada has to be sanitized and camouflaged to protect those in power from even admitting that we kill over 100,000 human lives yearly by abortion. Therefore, we call this atrocity “choice.”  In the case described above I believe the “finest legal minds” are engaged in a form of word corruption in order to hide the truth of what we are doing to human life in this lawless land. (Canada has no law on abortion)

“Where the speech is corrupted, the mind is also.” –Seneca

Still, one must not be too hard on the word corrupting judiciary when even politicians themselves want to remain ignorant about human life. M.P. Stephen Woodworth’s Motion 312 on finding out when human life begins was opposed by 203 MPs.  Surely it was a day of disgrace for Canada and an insult to humanity.

Even the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) was against Motion 312, despite the fact that reputable medical texts and scientific journals tell us that life begins at fertilization.

We live in a lawless and truth-corrupting land that fails in its duty to protect human life, but instead attempts to hide the truth by perverting the language. We are a country in disgraceful denial when a majority of politicians, the so-called “lawmakers,” vote to remain ignorant of when human life begins. We are a country in denial when judges describe human life as a “thing” or an “object.” We are a country in denial when most of the media cover up the atrocities committed on innocent human life by abortionists. We are a country in denial when the language becomes debased and twisted in order to protect the big lie that killing by “choice” is “respectable.”

“If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.” -Josef Goebbels

Stephen J. Gray

November 26,2012.

 Endnote:

[1] http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/the-right-words/

See the slaughtered victims of “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

The Political Race

The serfs turned out in faithful numbers to make a selection in the two-horse political race.  The horses colours were blue and red and both were from similar political stables, albeit they had different names. Blue Horse was from the Dumbocrat’s stable and the Red Horse was from the Republicrat’s stable. Both horses were well fed and watered and were the “best” in the country and produced the finest manure in the land. They were favourites of the financiers and many of the people. The people gambled by placing an X for the horse of their choice, not knowing (or ignorant of the fact) that whoever won they themselves would be the losers. This would be the price they would pay for gambling on a “democracy.”  The winner of the race had a licence to punish, and punishment would be the prize for the people.

Both political jockeys were old political pros and knew the political racetrack well.  One media tipster was heard to say this race was a “political superbowl,” though most of the serfs would be in the toilet bowl after it was all over, if the horses ran true to form. Whichever jockey won the race would have as a prize a Big House as a residence for four years, and would be able to lord it over the gullible masses that cheered his victory. It was reported that billions of dollars were gambled on this political race. But, the really big winners would be the establishment elites who had trained and financed the winner and the loser.

Still, the serfs had a good time at the political race and some even chanted “four more years,” even though around 47 million of them were on food stamps, their jobs gone and their houses re-possessed by bailed out bankers. Unemployment was at a record high and the winner would be cheered mightily as he promised them more of the same. This was called “more change and hope to believe in” or “forward” to the “fiscal cliff.” The race was billed by the propagandists as “democracy in action” and the people lined up for hours to place their bets on the Blue or Red colours ridden by jockeys from the same mentality stable.

This was an event that proved no matter how incompetent the jockeys were or how the political race finished, the compliant serfs would cheer the winner, happy in their own stupidity. Some cynics said the race was fixed, but how could a race be fixed when both jockeys and horses were owned by the establishment? One media pundit did call the losing stable “yahoos” but he was perhaps ignorant of the fact that whoever won, the “yahoos” would rule.

Now the race was over and a yahoo won for the “yahoos” and the Big House was his for four more years. “Yahoo, yahoo,” screamed the serf victors in celebration as they waved their flags in honour of their own slavery. Then they went home to their food stamp existence, their high unemployment, their mortgaged-to-the-hilt homes (those that had homes), their National Dictator’s Authoritarian Act (NDAA) where they could be arrested or killed without due process, the killing of their young by state sanctioned abortion, endless wars, and a descent into totalitarianism and moral degeneracy. But the serfs thought they were “free.” Surely that is all that counts. Long live “democracy!”

Stephen J. Gray

November 13, 2012.

 Articles of interest below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg69QM1yXQQ

http://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/ndaa

http://lewrockwell.com/whitehead/whitehead62.1.html

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/reawakening-liberty/2012/nov/2/support-kill-list-and-ndaa-make-obama-and-romney-u/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/12/Gov-t-Withheld-Record-47-1-Million-Food-Stamp-Report  

The Animal Parliament: An Animal Fairy Tale

It was parliamentary Motion day in the Animal Parliament and all the animals were eager to get started. Especially as they were all being filmed for Animal T.V. (ATV) They all preened and clucked, some barked, others chirped at each other and a pit bull snarled at those who mocked it. Eventually they were all called to animal order by the speaker who was one of the most respected animals: a barnyard parrot.

 “The first animal motion to be voted on in our order paper today is: ‘When does animal life begin, Motion 123’ and should we discuss this important issue?” squawked the Parrot speaker as it shook its plumage and opened its beak in a birdlike smile. “But before we start on this important vote: are their any statements of animal wisdom?”  Immediately, there was a flurry of barking, clacking, whining, screaming, braying and other assorted noise from the various animals that had words of animal wisdom to impart.  “I see,” said the speaker, “we have a number of animals who wish to give us some beastly wisdom; therefore, the most important beasts will be first to speak, starting with the Most Honourable Portly Pig.”  “Respected Speaker,” said Portly Pig, “I believe it is very unfortunate that this motion has even been allowed to be on the order paper. I am also very upset that this motion comes from one of my party members of the Conservative Animal Party (CAP). I will try to get my animal members to vote against it.” With that Portly Pig sat down on his plump posterior on the barn floor, which functioned as the Animal Parliament’s place of respect.

Next animal up was the Honourable Noisy Pit Bull, it stood up on its hind legs and snarled and barked in dog language. “What the heck is going on, I don’t need to know when animal life begins, that’s why we are all stupid animals.” Most of the animals whined, screamed, clacked and clucked appreciation on hearing this wisdom from Noisy Pit Bull and one even attempted to nuzzle the dog. Others attempted some animal applause by banging their tails on the barn floor. Order, order squawked the speaker who was a Parrot of respected lineage and even knew some human words.

Next up was the Most Honourable Socialist Monkey of the Socialist Animal Party (SAP). “Why are we even discussing this animal nonsense chattered the Socialist Monkey? This kind of proposed discussion is an insult to female animals of all kinds and could intimidate them from having free choice in Animal Land. This is a plot of the CAP to undermine Reproductive Animal Rights.”

“Well said,” screeched Glibby the Goose a notable member of the SAP. “Order, order, order,” screeched the Parrot Speaker from its perch on top of the barn door.

Next up was Most Honourable Slippery Snake of the Liberal Animal Party (LAP). A well respected slippery creature which moved easily from one party to another. “This matter has already been decided” said Slippery Snake.  “Reproductivity is a private matter and we must not violate privacy by attaining information that might cause us to think.” And with that the snake slithered back to its favourite hole in the barn.

“It is now time for the vote. ‘On when Animal Life Begins, Motion 123’” said the Parrot Speaker.

The Vote then went ahead and after a short time the Parrot announced the results.

“This Animal Parliament has decided against finding out when animal life begins. We are just ignorant and stupid animals and we do not need to know about our life beginnings. It is better than we remain dense, silly and unaware and go about our daily business in the parliamentary barnyard as ignorant animals. We are only beasts, secure in our stinking existence amongst the manure we produce. Therefore, this Animal Parliament has spoken and its animal brains cannot be filled with information that might make us think and reason and bring in laws. Animal Parliament is now adjourned for today.”

On hearing this animal wisdom from the Parrot speaker, the Animal Parliament erupted in a noisy self congratulation of screaming, barking, hissing, whining, cackling and braying. And the animal members of the CAP, LAP and SAP parties all congratulated each other on being honourable animals of distinction in the Animal Parliament.

Stephen J. Gray

November 1, 2012.