Are They Armchair Assassins?

They watch computer screens in cozy armchairs

Are they Armchair Assassins in their secure lairs?

Are they operators of death and destruction?

Are they “legalized” hitmen? Do they have no compunction?

Some of their “work” hours are nine to five

They press their buttons and bring death to the alive

Sometimes they kill children, “but it’s all a mistake”

An apology will be issued for any “errors” they make

Collateral damage is the deceptive words used

When innocents are slaughtered and murdered too

Some even call this “responsibility to protect”

Then they praise this hellish and sick effect

But hey, these are the “good guys,’’ do they sanction murder?

Where is the law? Are we seeing a disorder?

Is there no respect for life, and human decency?

Can killing be “legitimized” instead of being an obscenity?

 Is something very wrong in this world today?

Can authorized killing be legal anyway?

No pleas, No trials, No laws, No courts of justice

Can an illegal death sentence be totally callous?

Do we have “official” terrorists: name calling terrorists?

Has murder been incorporated amongst the “best” of us?

We all better think and perhaps beware

Are there state approved assassins in comfortable armchairs?

Stephen J. Gray

December 15,2012.

Articles of interest:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/pain-continues-after-war-for-american-drone-pilot-a-872726.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8695679/168-children-killed-in-drone-strikes-in-Pakistan-since-start-of-campaign.html

http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/us-drone-strikes-violate-the-sanctity-of-life/Content?oid=4222121

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/british-intelligence-officers-accused-of-murder-over-drone-attacks-in-pakistan-8223399.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/drone-attacks-are-acts-of-terrorism-168-children-killed-in-america-s-drone-war-in-pakistan-photographic-evidence/30603   

A Christmas Present to Chinese Communists

“Canada approved China's biggest overseas energy acquisition, a $15.1 billion takeover by state-owned CNOOC of Canadian oil and gas producer Nexen…” [4]  CBS News, December 7, 2012

Hello Canadians!  Were you impressed by PM Stephen Harper’s early Christmas present to a State Owned Enterprise (SOE) of Communist China? Do you feel good about part of your country being given away and then described as a “net benefit” to Canada? Has anybody seen the definition of “net benefit” explained? Do we have to ask the Chinese to “explain” the “deal” as our Industry Minister told us to? [1] Were you impressed seeing Stephen Harper at a news conference podium, inscribed with the words “A STRONG CANADA”? Did you wonder how our country can be “strong” if we allow some of our resources to be owned by a communist dictatorship? Is that not a sign of being ethically challenged and morally weak? Still, “A STRONG CANADA” is an excellent marketing slogan and no doubt most of the media fell for it. I did not hear any of them asking how our land can be “strong” if we surrender our resources without debate in parliament and ignore the people of this country, who according to a poll were “73%” opposed. [2] Still, we are told we live in a “democracy.” But are we seeing hypocrisy? PM Stephen Harper is on record as saying this:

"I don't think Canadians want us to sell out important Canadian values -- our belief in democracy, freedom, human rights. They don't want us to sell that out to the almighty dollar.'' -- Stephen Harper talking about relations with China in 2006 [3]

Then just the other day Stephen Harper says this:

"To be blunt, Canadians have not spent years reducing ownership of sectors of the economy by our own governments only to see them bought and controlled by foreign governments instead.”[4]

Is our great leader confused? He just approved a part of our country to be “bought and controlled” by a “foreign” communist government. Still, he did say, “the [Harper] government would only consider future takeover deals in the oil sands by state-owned companies in exceptional circumstances.” [4] Gee, it gets curiouser and curiouser here in Tory Wonderland. I wonder, what does “exceptional circumstances” mean? But hey, in Tory Wonderland words can mean anything you want them to mean. It could be called a BS marketing ploy or an attempt to baffle the people. Just make the words sound good and all will be well. And it was. In fact, I heard a media panel on a political show say they were in agreement with the communist SOE deal (as are most other corporate mainstream media as well). Maybe this media “scrum” was competing for an Order of Canada award or a Senate seat.  Just kidding, but who knows?

Anyway, the “deal” is done and none of the “conservative” MPs spoke out on opposition to this handover to a bloodthirsty communist regime, though one keeps hearing some were against it. One would have thought they would have had the moral courage to speak out and oppose it and the undemocratic way it was done: No debate in parliament and no public consultation. How can these “conservative” MPs look in the mirror at their own faces without being disgusted with themselves? Does allegiance to Mr. Harper mean more to them than allegiance to their country’s democratic tradition?  Still, it is the season of goodwill and giving, and I believe the Harper “conservatives” gave the Chinese Communists a Christmas present from Canada by approving the communist SOE deal. But, cheer up everybody: we are getting two Pandas on loan so that should be a “net benefit” to us all. So Merry Christmas Canada!

Stephen J. Gray

December11, 2012.

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/paradis-says-it-s-now-up-to-china-to-explain-deal-to-canadians-1.1072194

[2] http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2012/12/almost-nobody-likes-the-nexen-deal-december-7-2012/

[3] http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/12/08/Nexen-Harper/

[4] http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34227_162-57557952/canada-oks-chinas-largest-soverseas-energy-acquisition/

Article of interest:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/02/11/harper-china-saturday.html

A CPC Comrade’s Letter to the CPC of Canada Hurrah! Our SOE Passed the “Net Benefit” Test (Satire) By Stephen J. Gray

Dear Comrades of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). This is my second letter to you. [1] How are things in Panda Land? Panda-ring well I hope. Hey, just a silly pun on our loan of two pandas to you; anyway, on to my reason for writing.

As a good communist of the Communist Party of China (CPC) and supporter of our State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), I wish to thank you for approving one of our SOEs.  I hear it passed your “net benefit” test with flying red colours. We are so grateful in the communist party that your great leader and Chairman did allow some of your country’s resources into our hands. I liked the way he did it, without any input by the people or your parliament. We operate the same way in our Politburo so our “strategic partnership” should be beneficial to all the elites concerned. I would also like to thank the business leaders and many of your media propagandists in your country who supported this deal between capitalism and communism. One clever fellow even said it was “no big deal.” He obviously appreciates how we run our country.

Many of these people would make good communists. In fact your media propagandists, just like our state-owned media, are quite similar in many ways. Ownership is in a few hands and they parrot some of the same views we do. I especially like your Irrational Post, the Glib and Mail, and the Red Star. I hope I got their names correct; if not I sincerely apologise.  I believe that old saying is very true: “birds of a feather flock together”—though we are not birds, but all comrades together bound by our common greed; pardon me, I mean need. We need your resources and you need our communist money. Some people say “bloodstained money is the root of all evil” but they are just losers who do not like imposed order. In an ordered society the masses must be ruled with an iron fist and your Chairman, just like our famous Chairman Mao, does not allow dissent in his party. Nor does he like it in his country.

I know there are some in your country who babble on about the lack of human rights in my country and the use of torture, slave labour and forced abortions, as well as our one child policy. But it is no good the kettle calling the pot black, as the saying goes. You also have your ugly side. There was an article that said about your country, “Canada’s official statistics agency has confirmed that 491 babies died after they were born alive during abortions…” [2] And your country even gave its highest award to an abortionist. In fact, your country does not even wish to discuss “when human life begins.” And your great leader and Chairman voted against finding out when life begins. He obviously prefers to be ignorant rather than informed. But hey, great leaders are allowed to be ignorant; that’s why leaders are great. Still, the people need to be re-educated on the facts of life, and that wisdom always comes from the great Chairman. Politics and business are above the concerns of the masses, and monetary power and political power go hand in hand. Ethics, principles, morality and human rights have no place in a “net benefit” test, that’s why we have re-education camps in our country.

Now that we are going to be firmly ensconced in your country we could help your great leader and Chairman set up some re-education camps if he so wishes.  After all, he did at one time criticize us, but did see the error of his ways, so obviously he had a great conversion to our system and now we are classed as a “friend” and “ally.” So you see, villains can become virtuous if the right propaganda, oops I mean attempts, are made to give them respect. Does that make sense?  Anyway, it doesn’t really matter we are all in bed together now, a ménage a trois of politicians, Big Business, and Media. A threesome of communism, capitalism and propaganda joined together to support and promote each other in a world of hypocrisy and deceit.  I hope I am coming across like a true communist. Or as one of your respected business leaders once said, “now we can get down to business.”

In closing, I must say I am very impressed with most of your propagandists; pardon me, I believe you call them journalists. Most of them promoted our State Owned Enterprise (SOE) having access to your resources. In fact, one journalist inferred that those who opposed it were hypocrites. This is the kind of rhetoric we like to use in the communist party against those who dissent. It is gratifying to see your propagandists act the same way. This is very good and helps to confuse the reality of what is really going on: our takeover of some of your resources and part of your country. As I said earlier, many of your promoters of our SOEs would make good communists. And as good communists we censor the internet in our country. I see it has been reported in your country that you are also trying to censor information:

“NDP MP Charlie Angus said it is disturbing the government is forcing internet companies to remove content, saying it is the kind of thing usually done by authoritarian regimes.” [3]

Anyway, as the season of goodwill and happy holidays approaches, this Comrade of the CPC wishes the Comrades of the CPC in Canada a Happy Comrades Season. The same applies to your Big Business Comrades and your media propagandists. May we all prosper in our “strategic partnership” and perhaps our countries some day could merge and become one big State Owned Enterprise (SOE).  We could call it CanChin or ChinCan; anyway, that is just a thought. But who knows what may happen down this “strategic partnership” road.

Yours in Solidarity: A CPC comrade.

Stephen J. Gray

December 7,2012.

 Previous Correspondence between Comrades at link below

[1] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2011/07/imaginary-letter-of-thanks-from-cpc-to.html

Endnotes:

[2] http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/491-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-left-to-die-in-canada-statscan

[3] http://www.ipolitics.ca/2012/11/23/harper-government-requests-to-wipe-content-off-the-web-on-the-rise/ 

Articles of interest at links below:

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/canada/cnooc-security-arrest-falun-gong-adherents-302266.html

http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/stephen-harper-plans-china-trip-to-strengthen-ties/article2126005/?service=mobile

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220591/The-cruel-truth-Chinas-panda-factories.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/02/11/harper-china-saturday.html

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/china-news/evidence-that-wife-of-disgraced-official-traded-in-bodies-group-says-316524.html

491 Murders that the Mainstream Media Ignored

“Pro-life advocates are calling for a federal investigation after Canada’s official statistics agency has confirmed that 491 babies died after they were born alive during abortions between 2000 and 2009.” [1] Lifesite News, Patrick B. Crane, November 28, 2012.

One would have thought the so-called “investigative media” would have been all over this story and that it would have been headline news. Still, Canada’s media have been busy lately writing about the sled dogs slaughter and the sentencing of the dogs’ killer. Granted, the dog story is an important issue, but surely the slaughter and killing of 491 innocent human lives by abortionists is worthy of publicity also? But no, sadly the killing of these tiny humans did not rate a mention by the mainstream media’s written word or TV news.

Something is deadly wrong in our society today when a mass killing of this magnitude is covered up, or missed by the mainstream media. One wonders if it had been 491 dogs slaughtered or left to die—would the media have missed the story then? Based on their reporting on the killing of animals I don’t believe so. In fact, many media show their bias in favour of abortion.  Consider an editorial headlined “The Abortion debate is over so shut up” in Vancouver Province of November 20, 2012, which stated,

“Anti-abortionists need to get this through their skulls: the debate is over and you lost. Women long ago won the right to have control over their bodies, and the choice about whether and when to have children, and Canadians massively support that right. Abortion is not murder, so get over it. [2]

Oh really? I wonder what the Province editorialists think about the 491 babies who survived abortion but were left to die. But hey, the Province tells us, “Abortion is not murder, so get over it.” Perhaps that is why the story of the 491 babies who survived abortion is not headlines in the Province newspaper.

I believe if we had any ethics in this country, we would stop pretending that killing by “choice” is okay. We would call this abominable word “abortion” what it really is, the suctioning out, the cutting up, and the carving to pieces of innocent human lives. The gory killings would have to be shown by our so-called “investigative media" instead of them covering up the evidence.  The medical butchers would be put on trial. So one has to ask why there has been no homicide charges laid against those who committed the atrocities against the 491 innocent human lives.

Stephen J. Gray

December 1, 2012.

 Endnotes:

[1] http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/491-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-left-to-die-in-canada-statscan

[2] http://blogs.theprovince.com/2012/11/20/editorial-the-abortion-debate-is-over-so-shut-up/

Some examples below on the media mass coverage of the sled dogs killings:

http://www.theprovince.com/sports/jail+killed+sled+dogs/7599786/story.html#axzz2DjKp1P00

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Sled+dogs+killed+Whistler+slaughter+buried+near+Penticton/7489636/story.html#axzz2DjKp1P00

http://www.theprovince.com/news/SPCA+slams+light+sentence+sled+killer/7594947/story.html#axzz2DjKp1P00

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1291826--gasps-as-court-hears-gory-details-of-sled-dogs-deaths

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/22/gory-death-details-heard-at-sentencing-for-man-who-killed-sled-dogs-in-b-c/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/fawcett-spared-jail-time-in-sentencing-related-to-sled-dog-killings/article5566662/ 

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/b-c-man-gets-probation-for-sled-dog-slaughter-1.1048840

The “rock star” Banker

The headlines said a “rock star” banker was leaving

The media went into a frenzy the country was supposedly grieving

Oh, who will save us now, was the noisy media cry

Their “rock star” banker would soon be saying goodbye

He was going to jolly old Blighty, to save it from its troubles

Even though some say it was bankers that caused the financial bubble

But hey, the banking “rock star” will surely be a wow

But what will happen to his old bank, can anyone help them now?

There is always help available, another money printer will arrive

And when the “rock star” leaves: the bank will still survive

Bankers do not suffer austerity or any wear and tear

As long as there are servile taxpayers here and everywhere

The taxpayers bailed out the manipulative Libor-raters

Now they are preaching austerity these financial operators

But don’t worry, a banking “rock star” will take control

As people everywhere sink deeper into a big financial hole

Still, lighten up all you worried serfs as you lose your “best and brightest”

There is always another banking “rock star” amongst Goldman’s finest

Bankers rule this world of ours, that’s why we are all in debt

The money printers are in charge, do we really have a “rock star” asset?

Stephen J. Gray

November 28,2012.

Articles of interest:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/goldman-sachs-completes-economic-takeover-of-europe.html

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/meet-35-foreign-banks-got-bailed-out-fed-and-just-cpff-banks

http://mises.ca/posts/blog/the-canadian-bank-bailout/

Is Society Terrified of the Truth?

“A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” -John F. Kennedy

The truth of the humanity of the pre-born child in Canada continues to be undermined, suppressed and twisted by so-called educated and intelligent people. An article by Charlie Gillis of MacLeans of November 14, 2012 stated,

“The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada is seldom at a loss for words. But even Beverley McLachlin stopped in her verbal tracks last month while hearing arguments in the matter of Regina v. Ivana Levkovic….Levkovic, a former stripper from Mississauga, Ont., was accused of leaving the body of her newborn daughter on her apartment balcony, to be found—badly decomposed in a plastic bag—by her landlord when she vacated.” [1]

According to the article, the judges hearing the case were having difficulty finding the “right words” to describe the little human victim. The article goes on to say this about the judicial language:

“Thus began a kind of linguistic minuet, as the judges reached for acceptable nomenclature for a hypothetical baby that the law might not regard as a person. McLachlin tried ‘object’ and ‘being’ and, at one cringeworthy point, referred to it as ‘this, um, dead, um, whatever.’ Her colleagues didn’t fare much better. During a discussion of the applicability of mens rea, Justice Michael Moldaver, a former criminal lawyer who joined the court one year ago, referred to the infant in such cases as ‘the thing.’”[1]

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” -George Orwell

This is where the disrespect for human life has led us. A human life is described as ‘the thing.’ Still, one should not be surprised at the weasel words being used by judges and others to describe an innocent little human life. The truth in Canada has to be sanitized and camouflaged to protect those in power from even admitting that we kill over 100,000 human lives yearly by abortion. Therefore, we call this atrocity “choice.”  In the case described above I believe the “finest legal minds” are engaged in a form of word corruption in order to hide the truth of what we are doing to human life in this lawless land. (Canada has no law on abortion)

“Where the speech is corrupted, the mind is also.” –Seneca

Still, one must not be too hard on the word corrupting judiciary when even politicians themselves want to remain ignorant about human life. M.P. Stephen Woodworth’s Motion 312 on finding out when human life begins was opposed by 203 MPs.  Surely it was a day of disgrace for Canada and an insult to humanity.

Even the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) was against Motion 312, despite the fact that reputable medical texts and scientific journals tell us that life begins at fertilization.

We live in a lawless and truth-corrupting land that fails in its duty to protect human life, but instead attempts to hide the truth by perverting the language. We are a country in disgraceful denial when a majority of politicians, the so-called “lawmakers,” vote to remain ignorant of when human life begins. We are a country in denial when judges describe human life as a “thing” or an “object.” We are a country in denial when most of the media cover up the atrocities committed on innocent human life by abortionists. We are a country in denial when the language becomes debased and twisted in order to protect the big lie that killing by “choice” is “respectable.”

“If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.” -Josef Goebbels

Stephen J. Gray

November 26,2012.

 Endnote:

[1] http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/the-right-words/

See the slaughtered victims of “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

The Political Race

The serfs turned out in faithful numbers to make a selection in the two-horse political race.  The horses colours were blue and red and both were from similar political stables, albeit they had different names. Blue Horse was from the Dumbocrat’s stable and the Red Horse was from the Republicrat’s stable. Both horses were well fed and watered and were the “best” in the country and produced the finest manure in the land. They were favourites of the financiers and many of the people. The people gambled by placing an X for the horse of their choice, not knowing (or ignorant of the fact) that whoever won they themselves would be the losers. This would be the price they would pay for gambling on a “democracy.”  The winner of the race had a licence to punish, and punishment would be the prize for the people.

Both political jockeys were old political pros and knew the political racetrack well.  One media tipster was heard to say this race was a “political superbowl,” though most of the serfs would be in the toilet bowl after it was all over, if the horses ran true to form. Whichever jockey won the race would have as a prize a Big House as a residence for four years, and would be able to lord it over the gullible masses that cheered his victory. It was reported that billions of dollars were gambled on this political race. But, the really big winners would be the establishment elites who had trained and financed the winner and the loser.

Still, the serfs had a good time at the political race and some even chanted “four more years,” even though around 47 million of them were on food stamps, their jobs gone and their houses re-possessed by bailed out bankers. Unemployment was at a record high and the winner would be cheered mightily as he promised them more of the same. This was called “more change and hope to believe in” or “forward” to the “fiscal cliff.” The race was billed by the propagandists as “democracy in action” and the people lined up for hours to place their bets on the Blue or Red colours ridden by jockeys from the same mentality stable.

This was an event that proved no matter how incompetent the jockeys were or how the political race finished, the compliant serfs would cheer the winner, happy in their own stupidity. Some cynics said the race was fixed, but how could a race be fixed when both jockeys and horses were owned by the establishment? One media pundit did call the losing stable “yahoos” but he was perhaps ignorant of the fact that whoever won, the “yahoos” would rule.

Now the race was over and a yahoo won for the “yahoos” and the Big House was his for four more years. “Yahoo, yahoo,” screamed the serf victors in celebration as they waved their flags in honour of their own slavery. Then they went home to their food stamp existence, their high unemployment, their mortgaged-to-the-hilt homes (those that had homes), their National Dictator’s Authoritarian Act (NDAA) where they could be arrested or killed without due process, the killing of their young by state sanctioned abortion, endless wars, and a descent into totalitarianism and moral degeneracy. But the serfs thought they were “free.” Surely that is all that counts. Long live “democracy!”

Stephen J. Gray

November 13, 2012.

 Articles of interest below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg69QM1yXQQ

http://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/ndaa

http://lewrockwell.com/whitehead/whitehead62.1.html

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/reawakening-liberty/2012/nov/2/support-kill-list-and-ndaa-make-obama-and-romney-u/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/12/Gov-t-Withheld-Record-47-1-Million-Food-Stamp-Report  

The Animal Parliament: An Animal Fairy Tale

It was parliamentary Motion day in the Animal Parliament and all the animals were eager to get started. Especially as they were all being filmed for Animal T.V. (ATV) They all preened and clucked, some barked, others chirped at each other and a pit bull snarled at those who mocked it. Eventually they were all called to animal order by the speaker who was one of the most respected animals: a barnyard parrot.

 “The first animal motion to be voted on in our order paper today is: ‘When does animal life begin, Motion 123’ and should we discuss this important issue?” squawked the Parrot speaker as it shook its plumage and opened its beak in a birdlike smile. “But before we start on this important vote: are their any statements of animal wisdom?”  Immediately, there was a flurry of barking, clacking, whining, screaming, braying and other assorted noise from the various animals that had words of animal wisdom to impart.  “I see,” said the speaker, “we have a number of animals who wish to give us some beastly wisdom; therefore, the most important beasts will be first to speak, starting with the Most Honourable Portly Pig.”  “Respected Speaker,” said Portly Pig, “I believe it is very unfortunate that this motion has even been allowed to be on the order paper. I am also very upset that this motion comes from one of my party members of the Conservative Animal Party (CAP). I will try to get my animal members to vote against it.” With that Portly Pig sat down on his plump posterior on the barn floor, which functioned as the Animal Parliament’s place of respect.

Next animal up was the Honourable Noisy Pit Bull, it stood up on its hind legs and snarled and barked in dog language. “What the heck is going on, I don’t need to know when animal life begins, that’s why we are all stupid animals.” Most of the animals whined, screamed, clacked and clucked appreciation on hearing this wisdom from Noisy Pit Bull and one even attempted to nuzzle the dog. Others attempted some animal applause by banging their tails on the barn floor. Order, order squawked the speaker who was a Parrot of respected lineage and even knew some human words.

Next up was the Most Honourable Socialist Monkey of the Socialist Animal Party (SAP). “Why are we even discussing this animal nonsense chattered the Socialist Monkey? This kind of proposed discussion is an insult to female animals of all kinds and could intimidate them from having free choice in Animal Land. This is a plot of the CAP to undermine Reproductive Animal Rights.”

“Well said,” screeched Glibby the Goose a notable member of the SAP. “Order, order, order,” screeched the Parrot Speaker from its perch on top of the barn door.

Next up was Most Honourable Slippery Snake of the Liberal Animal Party (LAP). A well respected slippery creature which moved easily from one party to another. “This matter has already been decided” said Slippery Snake.  “Reproductivity is a private matter and we must not violate privacy by attaining information that might cause us to think.” And with that the snake slithered back to its favourite hole in the barn.

“It is now time for the vote. ‘On when Animal Life Begins, Motion 123’” said the Parrot Speaker.

The Vote then went ahead and after a short time the Parrot announced the results.

“This Animal Parliament has decided against finding out when animal life begins. We are just ignorant and stupid animals and we do not need to know about our life beginnings. It is better than we remain dense, silly and unaware and go about our daily business in the parliamentary barnyard as ignorant animals. We are only beasts, secure in our stinking existence amongst the manure we produce. Therefore, this Animal Parliament has spoken and its animal brains cannot be filled with information that might make us think and reason and bring in laws. Animal Parliament is now adjourned for today.”

On hearing this animal wisdom from the Parrot speaker, the Animal Parliament erupted in a noisy self congratulation of screaming, barking, hissing, whining, cackling and braying. And the animal members of the CAP, LAP and SAP parties all congratulated each other on being honourable animals of distinction in the Animal Parliament.

Stephen J. Gray

November 1, 2012.

Are Communism and Capitalism Partners?

“The very idea of reciprocity between Canada’s rule-of-law system based on economic and individual freedom and China’s totalitarian regime boggles the imagination.”

Terence Corcoran, writing in the Financial Post, in an article headlined, “Fascism by another name,” October 26, 2012. [1]

The Harper government has formed a “strategic partnership” with Communist China, and we see “free enterprise” political and business leaders and some media pundits praising this “partnership” of communism and capitalism. Big business invests in communist China while shutting down plants in democratic countries.

The latest business deal being praised by some is the proposed takeover of Nexen by China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) a State Owned Enterprise (SOE).

This deal has not been debated in parliament and makes one wonder why not? The Globe and Mail of October 25, 2012 stated: “Conservative MPs defeated a last minute push for Parliamentary hearings on a Canada-China investment treaty, which cabinet will be able to enact into law within days.” Are Canadian resources and sovereignty going to be signed away without input by the peoples’ representatives, or the people of Canada? If so: The question must be asked: Has Canada succumbed to authoritarianism?

“The authoritarian elites on both sides operate an ‘over world’ of organized conspiracy which mirrors the underworld of organized crime.” Charles Levinson in his book “Vodka Cola.”

The book “Vodka Cola” revealed in intimate detail the financial connections between the multi-national corporate elites in the west and the communist dictators in the Soviet Union before the “fall of communism.” Yet, these same corporate elites at that time were telling all and sundry about the “dangers of communism” while at the same time profiting from their business deals with the communist dictators.

Now fast forward to today and the multi-national corporate communists/fascists and their political puppets have found another dictatorship to profit from. Many are now firmly ensconced in communist China. China is a country where the organs are ripped from some of the people without their consent. A one child policy has resulted in forced abortions.  Slave labour has been reported: “Thirty-one dirty and disorientated workers have been rescued from a brickwork factory in China, where they were being held as virtual slaves.”[2]
Dissidents are tortured and it was reported that an alleged torturer was welcomed to Canada. The Epoch Times of May 29, 2007 had this to say:
“…Chinese official Bo Xilai was served with legal papers Monday, questions remain as to why the Chinese Commerce Minister accused of crimes against humanity was allowed to enter Canada in the first place. Despite the fact that Bo was one of a number of high-ranking Chinese officials who have been on an RCMP watch list, he freely entered the country with a trade delegation from China last Friday.” The Epoch Times article goes on to state: “Bo is accused of overseeing a systematic campaign of torture against adherents of Falun Gong, a Chinese meditation practice, in the northeast Chinese province of Liaoning, where he was governor from 2001 to 2004.” [3]

This is the kind of system that Harper’s government has signed a “strategic partnership” with and is in the process of deciding whether the Nexen deal is of, “net benefit” to Canada. Based on the evidence of the atrocities committed by the dictatorship in China, one has to ask is their any “net benefit” in allowing a communist State Owned Enterprise (SOE) having business interests in our country. If we do, are we guilty by association in the crimes against the Chinese people?

“The biggest beneficiary of the trade deficit with China and unemployment in the USA is big business in both America and China. For many years, these businesses have voluntarily defended the interests of the Chinese Communist party.  In these issues of unfair trade and manipulation of currency, they share the interests of the Chinese Communist Party.” [4]

Wei Jingsheng AsiaNews.it 11/20/2009

Do the words about “big business” above also apply to Canada?

I believe, what we are seeing in our world today is a combination of multi-national greed and political treachery.  Money and profits count far more than corporate ethics or national sovereignty. The business elites and their political handmaidens do not care who they rub shoulders with as long as there is money to be made and to hell with human rights.

“The multi-national companies are, therefore, the core of modern capitalism and have replaced the Western nation - state as the real political power centers of the age.”
Charles Levinson, page 16, “Vodka Cola.”

I believe the powerful partnerships of global capitalism/fascism and communism have become a danger to a free society. Corporate elites involve themselves and invest in countries with slave labour and other atrocities. Now they are seeking to consummate a business deal between capitalism and communism in this country. Therefore, one has to ask: Where are the business and political ethics if this communist State Owned Enterprise, CNOOC deal is given approval in Canada by the Harper government? The words below are worth thinking about?

“By Nov. 1 three of China's national oil companies will have more power to shape Canada's energy markets as well as challenge the politics of this country than Canadians themselves. And you can thank Prime Minister Stephen Harper for this economic treason.” [5]

Andrew Nikiforuk, The Tyee, October 11, 2012.

Stephen J. Gray

October 27, 2012.

Endnotes:
[1] http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/10/25/terence-corcoran-fascism-by-another-name/

[2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6733045.stm

[3] http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-5-29/55849.html

[4] http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=16920&size=A

 [5] http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/10/11/Chairman-Harper/

Unionized Corporate Media Goes Into a Feeding Frenzy

Like sharks in the water Canada’s unionized corporate media went into a feeding frenzy over the awarding of medals to two peaceful pro-life heroes.

Linda Gibbons and Mary Wagner, were “awarded Queen's Diamond Jubilee medals by a Conservative MP.” [1]

Maurice Vellacott was the MP who nominated them for the award.  The CBC news of October 23, 2012 described them as, “Two convicted criminals,…” What was their crime? Their “crime” in Canada today was peacefully protesting the killing of pre-born children in abortion chambers. Linda Gibbons has spent years in jail and Mary Wagner has also spent time in jail. This is the hellish state of justice in Canada today. Meanwhile Canada’s foremost abortionist received the country’s highest honor: The Order of Canada! And the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), at its 2008 convention, gave an award to abortionist Morgentaler.

“Delegates applauded loudly, with many moved to tears, as Dr. Henry Morgentaler was introduced as the 2008 recipient of the CLC Award for Outstanding Service to Humanity”[2]

In Canada today, “Outstanding Service to Humanity” is the killing of pre-born innocents by abortion and also gets you the Order of Canada.  It is beyond my comprehension how anyone would now accept this award after it was awarded into the bloodstained hands of an abortionist. I believe the Order of Canada is now tainted and an object of dishonour. Meanwhile, if you try to act honourably and bring attention to the killing of the innocents by abortion by peacefully protesting this gets you jail time. There is something terribly obscene in our society, when wrong is aided, abetted and honoured by the elites and also by a frenzied media that dares to call decent people “criminals.”

Courageous conservative MP Maurice Vellacott had this to say:

‘It's a pretty upside down world when we honour abortionists like Henry Morgentaler for killing over 5,000 babies and imprison precious women, like Mary Wagner and Linda Gibbons, who try to save babies from such savagery. They are the real heroes of humanity!’ [1]

The humanity of pre-born children in Canada cannot even be discussed as witness recently the 203 MPs who voted against discussing “when human life begins” and whose political cowardice cast a disgraceful pall over parliament.

Canada has no law on abortion, and ranks with communist China and North Korea in this vile situation. And just like China and North Korea protesting the killing of the innocents by abortion can get you jailed and ridiculed by the media as a “criminal.”

I believe the real criminals in Canada today are those in positions of power and those before them who have allowed this terrible atrocity of killing by abortion to continue unabated. I also believe the so-called “searchers for truth” in the media – except for a few – have covered up this slaughter of the innocents and continue to do so. I believe propaganda has replaced principles in journalism, politics and the law. The depraved slogan “freedom of choice” is the banner under which we kill our young and the word “criminals” is heaped upon decent people who protest Canada’s killing of its young. Propaganda is alive and well in Canada today and reminds me of another evil era where the truth was perverted and twisted.

“The effective propagandist must be a master of the art of speech, of writing, of journalism, of the poster and of the leaflet. He must have the gift to use the major methods of influencing public opinion such as the press, film and radio to serve his ideas and goals, above all in an age of advancing technology.” Josef Goebbles, Nazi propagandist,

Stephen J. Gray

October 24, 2012.

 Note: See the slaughtered victims of abortion that are hidden and censored by most of the media at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/10/23/pol-anti-abortionists-queens-diamond-jubilee-medals.html

[2] http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/07/pro-abortion-trade-unions-and-their.html

Open Treason?

Countries are herded into the EU: some without a vote by their people

And hard working honest citizens are herded like sheeple

Is “democracy” just another obsolete word?

As appointed and elected dictatorial rulers govern the herd

Are people treated like animals and restrained in the name of austerity?

Are the privileged financial elites wallowing in prosperity?

There is money by the trillions in offshore tax havens

Was some of it looted from the peoples’ savings?

Wars are financed by the peoples’ tax dollars

And young soldiers are sent to participate in bloody horrors

Profits are made by the bloodsucking ghouls

Do these parasites believe we are ignorant fools?

But thinking people know what is going on

As their countries are sold out for a, “free trade” song

Will “free trade” deals be signed without debate

Will treacherous politicians seal their countries fate

Has blatant treason become the order of the day?

Do the pillaging corporate cannibals hold sway?

They lurk in the shadows as their political puppets sign their deals

They could care less, how the people feel

Are we seeing treachery, treason, deceit and lies?

Camouflaged as “creating jobs” and “security ties”

“Partnerships” is another word they use

The marketers of B.S. have nothing to lose

Is a North American Union (NAU) in their plans?

Conspiracies have been around since time began

And in this age of keeping you “safe”

A New World Order is taking place

And if you haven’t heard of “Agenda 21”

This is a UN plan that’s looking to get done

The whole world is in this all encompassing plan

And you are in it even if you’re not a fan

The New World Order is out in the open

Globalism has arrived and is freedom just a token?

The marketers of lies and deceit are winning

And the propaganda merchants are in at the beginning

“Creating jobs” and “global security,” is the message to the slaves

Does power exist in the hands of treasonous knaves?

Is national sovereignty no longer in season?

Are we seeing open treason?

Stephen J. Gray

October 16, 2012.

Interesting links:

http://globalistagenda.org/

http://michaeljournal.org/bilder.htm

http://globalistagenda.org/quotes.htm

http://www.hli.org/index.php/kissinger-report/193

http://www.population-security.org/28-APP2.html  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLxIbvAHXOY

Humans with No Human Right

Note: I wrote this in 2008. SJG

“Each passing year brings new and more bizarre delusions being held up as truth”
( David Kupelian,  “ The Marketing of Evil” )

The truth is there are no human rights for the most vulnerable in Canada today, namely the innocent child in the mother’s womb. This little innocent can be killed right up to the moment of birth, provided she/he is not wanted. The killing of these little innocents is disguised under the evil marketing slogan of “choice.”

When animals are killed  the media shows the bloody mutilated bodies. We see  eagles, whales, bears, dogs, cats, seals, rabbits etc. subjected to inhumane acts. And one media article had the headline, “Rabbit-kill research may breach cruelty law”
 ( article at: http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/rabbitkill-research-may-breach-cruelty-law/2008/02/02/1201801098905.html ) 
Yet, people are criticized by most of the media if they show the cruelly dismembered, decapitated, disemboweled bodies of little babies slaughtered in abortion clinics, all because this evil is a considered acceptable  “choice.” What a dishonest and depraved society we live in that will not  show the evidence of the mutilated bodies of humans, but will show the mutilated bodies of animals.

 Lifesitenews.com  had this headline: “Mother of Seven Arrested Without Warning for Showing Abortion Image”  http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/sep/06092702.html   

The article stated: “Six to eight police officers arrived and forcibly put [Mrs. Ryan]
 in a paddy wagon, while confiscating her sign and umbrella….”
The  article goes on to quote the lady’s husband Peter Ryan,
 "Here's the analogy," he said. "The Nazi death camps are exterminating Jews. Outside someone protests with an image of the Holocaust. The camp staff complains to police. The person is arrested as a criminal. The slaughter goes on. That's where we now are in this country."
 I believe he is bang on with that statement; this arrest smacks of Gestapo-like tactics. Just like Germany under Hitler, you can now get arrested for showing and speaking the truth in this country.

Furthermore, Canada’s political “leaders” are lacking in courage on this butchering of the innocents who are denied their human rights. Witness the political party leaders in the last election where  these  political parrots were trying to outdo each other in their support of abortion -all of them noisily  squawking from their political perches that they were supportive of  “freedom of choice.” What  hellish statements  from the mouths of supposedly intelligent people. And these “people” want the citizens of this country to vote for them. How can anyone with principles vote for any of them when they do not have the courage to speak out and stop the slaughter of the innocents who have no human rights.

But wait, the politicians are all in agreement that the country will have a “human rights museum.” What a bunch of hypocrites. There are no human rights accorded the child in the womb but they can give multi-millions of taxpayers dollars for a “human rights museum.” One wonders will this museum have a section  for the atrocities committed on these little victims who have NO HUMAN RIGHTS. Somehow, I doubt it. This type of killing is “legal” in Canada, and it must be kept hidden from sight.

“Out of sight out of mind,” so the saying goes. We are a country that has lost its sanity of mind. A university “honors” the foremost abortionist in the country. This man is hailed as a “hero” by some and his gory work is acclaimed as “helping women.” And what is this “help” he gives them? As a practitioner of “choice” he kills their unborn children.

And “choice” on abortion at a number of universities seems to be the only speech allowed. Student pro-life clubs have been refused legitimacy and their free speech has been suppressed by the student brown shirts on campus. A few years ago at the university of B.C. a pro-life display was attacked and vandalized by the student supporters of “choice.”  But, this is the state of Canada today, where free speech and free expression is under the heel of the jackboot, and  the  innocent child in the womb is denied his/her human rights.

Stephen J. Gray\
March 8, 2008.

Note: to see the atrocities of “choice”  go to http://www.AbortionNo.org  

The Creators of Hell on Earth

They manufacture weapons that kill and maim

They are the peddlers of death the “respectable” insane

Clad in their tailored and expensive attire

These are the financiers of death who set the world on fire

Their clients are “statesmen,” dictators and despots

 And governments and their flunkeys who readily boast

Bloody mayhem and devastation is their forte

Their blood soaked profits mount after another sortie

Their hellish trade in mass destruction

Leaves innocent victims unable to function

Their slogan is, “bringing democracy”

It’s a wonder they don’t choke on their own hypocrisy

Villainous butchers get prizes for peace

And their vile depredations never cease

Their latest “smart” weapons are called the drones

And armchair assassins guide them into homes

And if they kill children by mistake

They say they are “sorry”: But it’s too late

Evil rules this “civilized” society

Drunk with power and claiming “sobriety”

These are the “experts” that never fight

B.S. merchants of left and right

You’ll see them on the T.V. shows

Out of their mouths the hot air blows

It’s all a dirty evil game

Financing both sides in war has no shame

These people have no morals and should get no respect

They kill under the banner of “responsibility to protect”

 War criminals that never go on trial

They are too powerful; and in reality vile

They have corrupted everything of any worth

They are the creators of hell on earth

Stephen J. Gray

October 14, 2012.

September 26th, 2012 a Day of Disrepute in Canada?

Wednesday Sept. 26, 2012 is the day of the vote on Stephen Woodworth’s Motion 312.  The Liberals’ and the NDP are already on record as saying they will vote against “when human life begins.” The Conservatives have a few members who support the motion, but have others in their party who will vote against the motion. Their leader Stephen Harper is on record as saying he will vote against Motion 312 and has received “rare praise from the NDP for siding with the left-wing party against a motion from a Conservative MP.” (Canoe News Sept. 17, 2012. Daniel Proussalidis, Parliamentary Bureau ) [1]

“I appreciate that the prime minister ... has clearly stated that there will be no support for M-312,” New Democrat MP Francoise Boivin [1]

The article from Canoe news went on to state:

“Harper has urged his caucus to oppose Tory MP Stephen Woodworth’s motion that would strike a committee to study whether a child is a human life at some point before full birth.” [1]

Anybody with half a brain knows the pre-born child is human before birth. We have seen our offspring moving around in ultra sound, and operations have even been performed on the child in the womb to correct any problems. See this link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-163105/The-miracle-operations-saved-babies-womb.html

The Canoe article goes on to say this:

“Boivin refuses to say whether it’s possible a child is human even five minutes before birth, fearing the question has implications for abortion.” [1]

Ah, abortion, that obscene “choice” promoted as a “woman’s right to choose” to have her child killed if it is unwanted. And the deed committed by an assassin masquerading as a doctor. But hey, this is Canada and we gave our country’s highest honour to an abortionist so what does that say about those who rule over us?

Well our “ruler” at the moment is Stephen Harper and he just like the Liberals’ who ruled before him, along with the NDP and others have long supported this atrocity of killing by choice in Canada.  People thought with Stephen Harper and his “conservatives” coming to power they would see some decency and morality returned to Canada. After all they were promised “accountability.” So where is the accountability when the prime minister of the country says he will vote against a motion to discuss when human life begins? Instead he has “urged” his caucus to also vote against the motion. What an undemocratic piece of political work this guy has turned out to be.  In fact, there is a video entitled: “PM Harper aligning himself with the hard left on abortion” that can be seen at Lifesite News [2]

I believe what we are seeing in this country is an abdication of responsibility to protect the most vulnerable in our society, namely the innocent pre-born child in the womb.  How can these members of parliament face their children and grandchildren and tell them they voted against when human life begins? The reason being: Killing by abortion had to be protected therefore the motion could not be discussed. How can they explain to those children if you were not wanted we could have had you killed by “choice?”

One can only say if these MPs vote against discussing when life begins then this country has degenerated into a despicable parody of politics and parliament has become a House of Disrepute.

Stephen J. Gray

September 22, 2012

Note: See the slaughtered victims of  “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

www.AbortionNo.org  

Endnotes:

[1] http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2012/09/17/20206806.html

[2] http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/video-pm-harper-aligning-himself-with-the-hard-left-on-abortion

Will Political Evil Rule?

Will Political Evil Rule?

By Stephen J. Gray

Will we see more hypocrisy and political cowardice in action over Stephen Woodworth’s motion 312? Another hour of debate on the motion will be held on Friday, September 21, and the vote on the motion will be on Sept. 26^th according to the latest reports.  Will politicians, except for a brave few, vote against finding out “when life begins?” Scientific and medical journals tell us that life begins at conception. But, our democratically challenged “right honourable” prime minister is on record as saying he will vote against the motion. Will he be joined by most of his “honourable” sycophantic bootlickers, lackeys and flunkeys who toe the PMs line. Will they throw any principles they might have had into the parliamentary garbage and vote against the motion? If so what will that say about free speech and freedom in Canada?

“In this storm of change, Canada stands as a beacon of light, built around our fundamental values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law.”

John Baird, Conservative MP and Minister of Foreign Affairs in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations [1]

Canada has no law on abortion (the same as China and North Korea) and Tory MP Baird trumpets “the rule of law.” The pre-born child has no “human rights” and our so-called “democracy” does not want to even discuss when human life begins.  

Mr. Baird went on to say in his speech to the Council on Foreign Relations: “I’m not going to stay quiet on an issue that is morally wrong and deserves to be condemned.” [1]

Really, Mr. Baird! Yet, your “leader” Stephen Harper and others do not want to discuss Motion 312. Is that not “morally wrong” and a suppression of free speech?  Mr. Baird further stated in his speech:

“We believe what’s right is right. And what’s wrong is wrong. And it is in defence of those beliefs that we act.” [1]

Yeah sure! Unless of course if it’s Motion 312 then your “leader” and most of his lackeys and others who call themselves “democratic” do not want to speak in “defence” of when human life begins.

The so called New Democratic Party is also opposed to Motion 312.  Yet, this is the party that calls itself “democratic.” but are afraid to discuss when human life begins. And last but not least, the Liberal Party is also against the motion. What are all these politicians afraid of? Answer: They are afraid of the truth. Life begins at conception and they do not want to discuss that truth. The ramifications for all of them if they allow discussion on when life begins; would shine the light on the darkness that covers this land and the truth would shine forth, that we kill our young and call the atrocity “choice.” Therefore the status quo of killing by choice must remain for these political cowards. And the truth must be silenced.

Free speech is a victim in this so-called “parliamentary democracy.” But the biggest victims are truth, honesty and justice and the ongoing victims in this country are the slaughtered innocents by abortion, on which our democratically challenged prime minister says: “As long as I am prime minister we are not opening the abortion debate” Stephen Harper, quoted in Globe and Mail, April 21, 2011

One has to ask: Is there some form of political evil residing in parliament when most of its members refuse to discuss when life begins or even contemplate a law against this obscenity of killing by “choice?” If our so-called “honourable representatives” will not discuss this motion, what other issues will they declare no discussion allowed? I believe we are in the hands of people unworthy of holding public office. I also believe they are a danger to a free society - a collection of cowards unfit to rule and need to be replaced before they impose more political evil upon us. Their so called “values” are deplorable, and make one wonder, do they have any?

I believe very strongly that in this world you have to have values…” [2]

Stephen Harper

Stephen J. Gray

September 19,2012.

Note: See the slaughtered victims of abortion “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

www.AbortionNo.org

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.international.gc.ca/media/aff/speeches-discours/2012/09/14a.aspx?view=d

[2] http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/02/10/pol-cbc-interview-stephen-harper.html