The Creators of Hell on Earth

They manufacture weapons that kill and maim

They are the peddlers of death the “respectable” insane

Clad in their tailored and expensive attire

These are the financiers of death who set the world on fire

Their clients are “statesmen,” dictators and despots

 And governments and their flunkeys who readily boast

Bloody mayhem and devastation is their forte

Their blood soaked profits mount after another sortie

Their hellish trade in mass destruction

Leaves innocent victims unable to function

Their slogan is, “bringing democracy”

It’s a wonder they don’t choke on their own hypocrisy

Villainous butchers get prizes for peace

And their vile depredations never cease

Their latest “smart” weapons are called the drones

And armchair assassins guide them into homes

And if they kill children by mistake

They say they are “sorry”: But it’s too late

Evil rules this “civilized” society

Drunk with power and claiming “sobriety”

These are the “experts” that never fight

B.S. merchants of left and right

You’ll see them on the T.V. shows

Out of their mouths the hot air blows

It’s all a dirty evil game

Financing both sides in war has no shame

These people have no morals and should get no respect

They kill under the banner of “responsibility to protect”

 War criminals that never go on trial

They are too powerful; and in reality vile

They have corrupted everything of any worth

They are the creators of hell on earth

Stephen J. Gray

October 14, 2012.

September 26th, 2012 a Day of Disrepute in Canada?

Wednesday Sept. 26, 2012 is the day of the vote on Stephen Woodworth’s Motion 312.  The Liberals’ and the NDP are already on record as saying they will vote against “when human life begins.” The Conservatives have a few members who support the motion, but have others in their party who will vote against the motion. Their leader Stephen Harper is on record as saying he will vote against Motion 312 and has received “rare praise from the NDP for siding with the left-wing party against a motion from a Conservative MP.” (Canoe News Sept. 17, 2012. Daniel Proussalidis, Parliamentary Bureau ) [1]

“I appreciate that the prime minister ... has clearly stated that there will be no support for M-312,” New Democrat MP Francoise Boivin [1]

The article from Canoe news went on to state:

“Harper has urged his caucus to oppose Tory MP Stephen Woodworth’s motion that would strike a committee to study whether a child is a human life at some point before full birth.” [1]

Anybody with half a brain knows the pre-born child is human before birth. We have seen our offspring moving around in ultra sound, and operations have even been performed on the child in the womb to correct any problems. See this link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-163105/The-miracle-operations-saved-babies-womb.html

The Canoe article goes on to say this:

“Boivin refuses to say whether it’s possible a child is human even five minutes before birth, fearing the question has implications for abortion.” [1]

Ah, abortion, that obscene “choice” promoted as a “woman’s right to choose” to have her child killed if it is unwanted. And the deed committed by an assassin masquerading as a doctor. But hey, this is Canada and we gave our country’s highest honour to an abortionist so what does that say about those who rule over us?

Well our “ruler” at the moment is Stephen Harper and he just like the Liberals’ who ruled before him, along with the NDP and others have long supported this atrocity of killing by choice in Canada.  People thought with Stephen Harper and his “conservatives” coming to power they would see some decency and morality returned to Canada. After all they were promised “accountability.” So where is the accountability when the prime minister of the country says he will vote against a motion to discuss when human life begins? Instead he has “urged” his caucus to also vote against the motion. What an undemocratic piece of political work this guy has turned out to be.  In fact, there is a video entitled: “PM Harper aligning himself with the hard left on abortion” that can be seen at Lifesite News [2]

I believe what we are seeing in this country is an abdication of responsibility to protect the most vulnerable in our society, namely the innocent pre-born child in the womb.  How can these members of parliament face their children and grandchildren and tell them they voted against when human life begins? The reason being: Killing by abortion had to be protected therefore the motion could not be discussed. How can they explain to those children if you were not wanted we could have had you killed by “choice?”

One can only say if these MPs vote against discussing when life begins then this country has degenerated into a despicable parody of politics and parliament has become a House of Disrepute.

Stephen J. Gray

September 22, 2012

Note: See the slaughtered victims of  “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

www.AbortionNo.org  

Endnotes:

[1] http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2012/09/17/20206806.html

[2] http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/video-pm-harper-aligning-himself-with-the-hard-left-on-abortion

Will Political Evil Rule?

Will Political Evil Rule?

By Stephen J. Gray

Will we see more hypocrisy and political cowardice in action over Stephen Woodworth’s motion 312? Another hour of debate on the motion will be held on Friday, September 21, and the vote on the motion will be on Sept. 26^th according to the latest reports.  Will politicians, except for a brave few, vote against finding out “when life begins?” Scientific and medical journals tell us that life begins at conception. But, our democratically challenged “right honourable” prime minister is on record as saying he will vote against the motion. Will he be joined by most of his “honourable” sycophantic bootlickers, lackeys and flunkeys who toe the PMs line. Will they throw any principles they might have had into the parliamentary garbage and vote against the motion? If so what will that say about free speech and freedom in Canada?

“In this storm of change, Canada stands as a beacon of light, built around our fundamental values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law.”

John Baird, Conservative MP and Minister of Foreign Affairs in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations [1]

Canada has no law on abortion (the same as China and North Korea) and Tory MP Baird trumpets “the rule of law.” The pre-born child has no “human rights” and our so-called “democracy” does not want to even discuss when human life begins.  

Mr. Baird went on to say in his speech to the Council on Foreign Relations: “I’m not going to stay quiet on an issue that is morally wrong and deserves to be condemned.” [1]

Really, Mr. Baird! Yet, your “leader” Stephen Harper and others do not want to discuss Motion 312. Is that not “morally wrong” and a suppression of free speech?  Mr. Baird further stated in his speech:

“We believe what’s right is right. And what’s wrong is wrong. And it is in defence of those beliefs that we act.” [1]

Yeah sure! Unless of course if it’s Motion 312 then your “leader” and most of his lackeys and others who call themselves “democratic” do not want to speak in “defence” of when human life begins.

The so called New Democratic Party is also opposed to Motion 312.  Yet, this is the party that calls itself “democratic.” but are afraid to discuss when human life begins. And last but not least, the Liberal Party is also against the motion. What are all these politicians afraid of? Answer: They are afraid of the truth. Life begins at conception and they do not want to discuss that truth. The ramifications for all of them if they allow discussion on when life begins; would shine the light on the darkness that covers this land and the truth would shine forth, that we kill our young and call the atrocity “choice.” Therefore the status quo of killing by choice must remain for these political cowards. And the truth must be silenced.

Free speech is a victim in this so-called “parliamentary democracy.” But the biggest victims are truth, honesty and justice and the ongoing victims in this country are the slaughtered innocents by abortion, on which our democratically challenged prime minister says: “As long as I am prime minister we are not opening the abortion debate” Stephen Harper, quoted in Globe and Mail, April 21, 2011

One has to ask: Is there some form of political evil residing in parliament when most of its members refuse to discuss when life begins or even contemplate a law against this obscenity of killing by “choice?” If our so-called “honourable representatives” will not discuss this motion, what other issues will they declare no discussion allowed? I believe we are in the hands of people unworthy of holding public office. I also believe they are a danger to a free society - a collection of cowards unfit to rule and need to be replaced before they impose more political evil upon us. Their so called “values” are deplorable, and make one wonder, do they have any?

I believe very strongly that in this world you have to have values…” [2]

Stephen Harper

Stephen J. Gray

September 19,2012.

Note: See the slaughtered victims of abortion “choice” at:

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

www.AbortionNo.org

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.international.gc.ca/media/aff/speeches-discours/2012/09/14a.aspx?view=d

[2] http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/02/10/pol-cbc-interview-stephen-harper.html

Are we seeing a “ganging up” against Motion 312?

Are we seeing a “ganging up” against Motion 312?

By Stephen J. Gray

“gang up… an act of ganging up or uniting in opposition to someone or something”

 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gang+up

Motion 312

“That a special committee of the House be appointed and directed to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth and to answer the questions hereinafter set forth;…” [1] (emphasis added)

M.P. Stephen Woodworth’s motion on “when human life begins” has caused an uproar and a frenzy of condemnation and opposition by many politicians, trade union bosses, radical feminists, the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), Canadian gynaecologists and others. What are they all afraid of? Are they terrified of the truth?

"We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark. The real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light." – Plato

Medical and scientific journals tell us that life begins at conception. And anybody who has ever watched their unborn child move around in an ultra sound knows that this is a human life. Doctors even operate on the child in the womb if there is a problem that needs to be fixed. See link below:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-163105/The-miracle-operations-saved-babies-womb.html

And then you have the abortionists who slaughter the babies who “need” to be killed if unwanted. What a sick society we have become. We even call the killing of these innocents “freedom of choice.” Surely that is a perversion of words and speech!

See the atrocities committed on the innocents here: www.unmaskingchoice.ca

And then you have a “pro-life MP” who supports motion 312, but also reportedly “supports the ‘government position’ to not introduce the ‘issue of abortion.’”

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mp-warawa-backs-woodworths-motion-312-clarifies-support-for-government-posi

“Where the speech is corrupted, the mind is also.” –Seneca

One has to wonder what is going on in the “brains” of this collection of strange bedfellows: Conservatives, Liberals, NDPers, union bosses, radical feminists and doctors opposed to discussing “when life begins.”

The CMA is opposed to motion 312 and never asked all their members before taking their bizarre stand against it. Journalist Brian Lilley at Sun News had an excellent article on his blog headlined: “I can’t believe these people are doctors” and wrote this about the CMA:

“There is a simple reason a group of doctors would not want such a debate. The science is clear, life begins at conception. Abortion ends a human life.” [2]

Of course thinking people know that and those in positions of power should know that. But, when it comes to taking a principled and honest position, many run from the medical and scientific evidence, their ethics (if they have any) and their responsibility to investigate and debate this subject.

In fact, any talk about discussing “when human life begins” appears to have our “science based” P.M. Stephen Harper running for cover. He is on record as saying: "In my case, I will be voting against the motion.” I guess his views on “science based” evidence only apply when he wants to look politically good. The Toronto Star of August 21, 2012 had the headline: “Stephen Harper wants to streamline environmental oversight,” the article quoted Mr. Harper as saying,

“We need thorough, balanced science-based assessments conducted on a timely basis according to the principle of one project, one review,” Harper said. [3]

 

Well, Mr. Harper, here is one project that needs a “review”: when life begins. Yet, you and other politicians and medical professionals, along with union bosses who claim to speak for all their compulsory members, wish to stop any discussion on “when human life begins.”

This can only mean you are all afraid of free speech and of facing up to the truth, which is, “science based,” that life begins at conception. And that would mean all of those opposed are guilty of self imposed ignorance to protect the abomination called “choice” on killing by abortion. Truly, there are none as blind as those who do not wish to see. I believe the quote below aptly sums up what is happening in our country today:

“The world is a dangerous place. Not because of the people who are evil; but because of the people who don't do anything about it.”

Albert Einstein

Stephen J. Gray

August 28, 2012.

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.stephenwoodworth.ca/canadas-400-year-old-definition-of-human-being/motion-312

[2] http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/i-cant-believe-these-people-are-doctors/

[3] http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1244511--stephen-harper-wants-to-streamline-environmental-oversight

More info at links below:

http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/blog/2012/08/16/canadian-physicians-no-genital-mutilation-yes-decapitation

http://lifesite.ca/news/canadian-gynecologists-oppose-motion-to-determine-when-life-begins

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/have+abortion+debate/7135511/story.html

http://www.caw.ca/en/11156.htm

http://www.cep.ca/en/news/at-the-union/reproductive-justice-activities

http://www.canadianlabour.ca/news-room/publications/womens-rights-are-not-debate-petition-m-312

http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/m312.html

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony/

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/07/pro-abortion-trade-unions-and-their.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/story/2012/06/25/wdr-caw-enters-abortion-debate.html

http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/video-pm-harper-aligning-himself-with-the-hard-left-on-abortion

http://socialistworkercanada.com/2012/03/29/defend-choice-defeat-motion-312/ 

http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Doctors+dodge+button+debate/7120823/story.html

Are Politicians Afraid to Discuss When Life Begins?

 Are Politicians Afraid to Discuss When Life Begins?

By Stephen J. Gray

“Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth's motion proposing that a parliamentary committee study the legal definition of when life begins got zero support from MPs who debated it Thursday.” [1]

Surely in a so-called “parliamentary democracy” any issue should be open for discussion. But it appears that discussing when human life begins is a no, no in the “house of democracy?” Why is this? The answer to that question is: If life begins at conception, and medical journals tell us this is so, then a huge number of politicians and others will be party to state sanctioned killing by abortion by supporting “choice.”  Many of them are known to parrot the banal slogan, “we believe in freedom of choice.” Their “choice” of course never describes the victim who is cut to pieces, killed by a saline solution or born alive and left to die if unwanted; because Canada, the “civilized country” has no law on abortion. The child in the womb can be slaughtered right up to the moment of birth. Then when it’s born, it magically becomes a human life. What was it before? A carrot, a turnip, an apple or an orange! Of course not, but hey, this is Canada where discussing the beginnings of life is taboo because killing by abortion is acceptable and human life is disposable.  Therefore, the issue must continue to be hidden from the light of truth.

"What have they to fear from the full flood of light? Why oppose a mere study?" [Stephen] Woodworth said.

"If you care about the truth you will courageously follow the facts wherever they lead. Canadians expect parliamentarians to embody that courage, that strength, that principled quest for the truth," he said. [1]

Truth has become a victim along with the unborn child in Canada. If truth prevailed the slaughtered victims of abortion would be on the front pages of daily newspapers in full bloody color. If truth prevailed in Canada the TV news would be showing the atrocities committed on these innocent victims murdered by abortion. If truth prevailed in Canada politicians and other professionals would condemn the barbarous practice of state sanctioned abortion. Instead we have hypocrisy and the refusal by those in power to act in an honourable and decent manner.

“Earlier in the day Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he will not support the [Woodworth] motion.” (CBC News of April 26, 2012.)

"In my case, I will be voting against the motion," Harper said. [1](emphasis added)

Is that a cowardly response from Stephen Harper? This is the same Mr. Harper who said this about a proposed oil pipeline.

“The only way that governments can handle controversial projects of this manner is to ensure that things are evaluated on an independent basis scientifically,…” [2]

Yet, there is scientific and medical evidence that life begins at conception, but Mr. Harper does not want to discuss the issue, not even “scientifically?”  Are pipelines more important than human life to Mr. Harper?

Stephen Harper is not the only political leader to be against Mr. Woodworth’s motion.

The CBC News of April 26, 2012, stated: “Harper was asked during question period by NDP Leader Tom Mulcair why he was allowing Woodworth and other members of his caucus to reopen the debate on abortion.”[1] (emphasis added)

The CBC news of April 26, 2012 also stated:
“NDP Leader Tom Mulcair said no one in his caucus supports the motion but he plans to whip the vote, or force his MPs to vote along party lines.
"We're resolutely in favour of women's right to choose, so it's very clear for us, and we are absolutely opposed to this motion of Mr. Woodworth," he said.” [1A]

It would appear that killing by abortion is a closed subject and must not be reopened.  Why is this? Surely, any issue should be open for debate as more knowledge on the subject becomes known? But no, as I said earlier discussion on abortion is forbidden and the slaughter must continue and the truth on the beginning of human life must not be discussed. So much for free speech in Canada and the practice of democracy by a party that calls itself “democratic.”

Anyway Stephen Woodworth’s Motion 312, according to the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC) is “coming up for a second round of debate on Sept 21 and a vote on Sept 26.” [3] It will be interesting to see how many MPs have the courage to vote in favour of Motion 312. After all, what could be wrong with finding out the truth of when life begins?  For as conservative M.P. Jason Kenney was quoted as saying while introducing Harper to, “Partisan supporters” in Mississauga, Ontario.

“We as Canadians have a special vocation, a special responsibility, to speak truth to power. To be a voice for the voiceless,...”[4] Jason Kenney

So will MPs have the courage to be a “voice for the voiceless” on Motion 312, or will they continue to ignore the truth that life begins at conception and hide and cower from their responsibilities to protect the helpless innocents slaughtered by abortionists?

Stephen J. Gray

August 16, 2012.

Endnotes:

[1] http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/04/26/pol-abortion-debate.html

[1A] http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/04/25/pol-abortion-stephen-woodworth-motion.html

[2] http://business.financialpost.com/2012/08/07/harper-says-science-not-politics-will-decide-northern-gateway-fate/  

[3] http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/m312.html

[4] http://www.therecord.com/news/elections/article/521237--cheering-conservative-partisans-shield-harper-from-awkward-terrorism-questions

More info at  links below:

http://www.stephenwoodworth.ca/canadas-400-year-old-definition-of-human-being/motion-312

http://jme.bmj.com/content/14/2/77.abstract

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/05/harper-pressures-mps-to-vote-against-motion-on-when-life-begins

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony/

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2011/01/enormity-of-evil.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2010/09/hate-crime-that-goes-unpunished.html

The Proposed Takeover of Nexen by Chinese Communists (SOE) And The Dismantling of The Canadian Wheat Board(CWB)

The Proposed Takeover of Nexen by Chinese Communists (SOE) And The Dismantling of The Canadian Wheat Board(CWB)

By Stephen J. Gray

"In just 12 short hours, the doors to marketing freedom will, at long last, be opened," said Minister Ritz. "The Harper Government has delivered on our long-standing commitment to give western wheat and barley farmers the same freedom to make business decisions that other farmers in Canada have long enjoyed." [1]

The Harper government has formed a “strategic partnership” with Communist China, and we see “free enterprise” political and business leaders and some media pundits praising this “partnership” of communism and capitalism. Big business invests in communist China while shutting down plants in democratic countries. The latest business deal being praised by some is the proposed takeover of Nexen by China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) a State Owned Enterprise (SOE). Yet, the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) government monopoly was broken up, to let the marketplace decide and give freedom to Canadian farmers.

“Welcome to grain marketing freedom day” Stephen Harper [2]

The CWB monopoly was disbanded by the Harper government believing that the market place should be open for competition and who would argue with that. Yet, this is the same Mr. Harper that consorts with communist dictators and forms a “strategic partnership” with them. Does Harper say one thing then do another?  We have a communist monopoly, SOE, bidding for Nexen. Does this sound like “marketing freedom day?” At least the CWB was in Canadian hands?  If the takeover of Nexen is allowed Canadian resources will be in communist hands! Could that be called, “marketing freedom day?”

“Canadian Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz said that he was aware of interest in buying the government-controlled CWB, although he said it was too soon to consider a takeover.”[3] (emphasis added)

It would appear that the Canadian “government controlled CWB” is over according to P.M. Harper. Yet, the State Owned Enterprise (SOE) of the communist government is open for “business.” Are we seeing “animal farm” politics taking place?   Are communists “more equal” than Canadian farmers? If the dismantling of the CWB was to bring freedom to farmers then surely the question has to be asked: Where is the freedom if Canada allows a communist SOE takeover of Nexen and Canadian resources? Does hypocrisy rule? We see the Canadian farmer freed from the CWB. Yet, there are those in power who wish to “partner” with communist China while spouting “freedom.”  The Epoch Times, of July 25, 2012 said this:

“David Harris, former chief of strategic planning for CSIS and director of the international and terrorist intelligence program at Insignis Strategic Research in Ottawa, said Canada needs to remember that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) maintains a tight grip on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and has no qualms about using them to whatever end it deems necessary.”[4]

In closing, one has to ask if it’s okay to get rid of, “the government-controlled CWB”  that Stephen Harper has called an "oppressive monopoly," [5] then will be it okay for a communist government, State Owned Enterprise (SOE) to takeover Nexen? Or is that not an "oppressive monopoly?" The answer to that is in the hands of Stephen Harper and his “free enterprise” Tories!

Stephen J. Gray

August 3, 2012.

Endnotes:

[1] http://news.gc.ca/web/article-eng.do?nid=688539  

[2] http://www.globalsaskatoon.com/video/harper+on+canadian+wheat+board/video.html?v=2262883979#stories

[3] http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/07/31/canada-wheatboard-idINL2E8IV7V820120731

[4] http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/canada/nexen-takeover-raises-sovereignty-fears-270578.html

[5] http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2011/10/16/pol-wheat-board-analysis.html

The Doomed Society

The Doomed Society

By Stephen J. Gray

In the doomed society they killed their young by abortion and called the depraved act a “choice.”

There was a motion in parliament to discuss, “when life begins,” but many politicians and political parties, some trade union leaders and others, including some in the medical community were dedicated to opposing this motion on “when life begins.” It appeared that this knowledge was not wanted in this so-called “democracy” and some did not want it even discussed. What does that say about them and free speech?

Yet, scientific knowledge that life begins at conception, is reported in medical journals. Now there was a report in a medical journal that asked should “therapeutic homicide,” be performed? What started as killing by “choice” on abortion appeared to be graduating to killing by “choice” on the old, infirm, sick and unwanted?

In the doomed society some people marched in parades of pride. Some were naked and made obscene gestures. Politicians and police chiefs had been known to participate in these parades and thousands gathered to watch. The news media gave pride of place to these parades on TV news and the newspapers gave gushing coverage. One newspaper reported this “parade of pride” as a family friendly affair. Corporate logos could be seen in the parades as were some trade union logos as well.  This was a society where anything goes! Men were “marrying” men and women were “marrying” women. This was called “same-sex marriage” and those who opposed it were called bigots and anti “equality.” Some people were asking if the excesses and madness of Ancient Rome had been re-incarnated to a so-called “civilization?"

In the doomed society the financial system had become corrupted. Thieving and fraud had become “legitimate” by those who were too big and too powerful to fail. Banks were bailed out with tax-payers dollars and taxpayers themselves did not qualify for bailouts. Their role in the scheme of things was to be beasts of burden and to be herded into debt slavery by those who controlled the system. Meanwhile, those who had crashed the system advised governments and told the debt slaves that they must learn to live with less. This was called austerity and it was imposed by the International Moneychangers Fund {IMF) which in turn was financed by the debt slaves’ tax dollars.

In the doomed society endless wars were promoted and approved by “respectable experts” who did not fight, but encouraged others to do their dirty work. The search for enemies was ongoing and constant. Some dictators were classed as “friends” and “allies” while others were described as “pariahs” after being “friends” at one time. Hypocrisy was the forte of the so-called “international community,” and young soldiers died or were maimed and crippled fighting these wars.  Cities and countries along with their civilian populations were decimated. War was good business for the corporate conglomerates, and arms dealers who had been known to supply both sides with weapons. The bloodstained profits were enormous for the elites and the misery of the victims was hell on earth. The war propagandists in the media and the political establishment called the atrocities of war “bringing democracy” and “responsibility to protect.” The language had become perverted in order to promulgate killing and destruction.

In the doomed society ethics, principles and morality had long since vanished. Capitalism and communism had a “strategic partnership.” One political leader received two pandas as a gift on loan. Some people wondered had these two pandas sealed the loss of a country’s sovereignty? Big business courted the communists and other dictators and they also placed profits before patriotism.  Forgetting that old saying, “he who sups with the devil should have a long spoon.”

In the doomed society truth had become lies and lies had become truths. The language had become debased and the written word twisted. Evil was marketed by the “experts” as a “good.” Political and big business propaganda was sold as “creating jobs.” The publicity business and marketers had a field day manipulating messages of support for communist dictators. The “news” was parroted by purveyors of propaganda and the people were lied to and spied on by those in power. Cell phones were bugged and personal computers too, credit cards tracked every purchase and driving licences were chipped. And the words of an old song were coming true: “freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.”

Stephen J. Gray

July 29, 2012.

Articles of interest at links below:

Choosing when and how to die: Are we ready to perform

therapeutic homicide?

http://www.cmaj.ca/content/early/2012/06/25/cmaj.120961.1

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/06/25/time-for-therapeutic-homicide-discussion-in-canada-medical-journal/

http://jme.bmj.com/content/14/2/77.abstract

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony/

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ten-companies-profiting-most-from-war-2012-02-28

www.unmaskingchoice.ca

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-gynecologists-oppose-motion-to-determine-when-life-begins/

Libor-rating the people

Libor-rating the people

(Satire) By Stephen J. Gray

A speech to the Bankers Banquet by respected banker Mr. Moneybags Mac Scam.

Dear Friends,

Once again we are in the forefront of negative publicity. All because it is claimed we “rigged” the Libor rate. Some are even equating us to gangsters and loan sharking. Which of course is ridiculous, we don’t have people bumped off for not paying their debts. Nor do we participate in illegal banking. All our business ventures are out in the open and sanctioned by governments. If we were involved in any illegality we would all be in jail. Yet, none of us have gone to jail therefore the system must be satisfied with our performances in the world of money. I know some of us have been fined huge amounts of money over money laundering and “financing terrorism” as well as banking drug money for organized crime, but none of us admitted any malfeasance, and we did apologize. Then we just paid up and carried on business like respected bankers do. Our burden is heavy looking after the peoples’ money, yet we get criticized just because we keep the banking system stable. Still, we soldier on despite all the negative publicity and do our work faithfully and honestly to the best of our abilities even though we are being victimised.

Still, I must say it was nice to see one financial columnist say one of our banks was a “victim” in the Libor affair even though it agreed to pay a huge fine.   But hey, money makes the world go around as the saying goes and the central banks always come to our rescue by printing more money should we need it. And let us not forget the backbone of society is the taxpayers. They are always available to bail us out when we need it. Then we lend the taxpayers money from their own money. Is that not “free enterprise” at its finest? So, really it is not good for us to berate ourselves over the so-called Libor “conspiracy.” I prefer to call it good planning. If we did not plan to fix the bank rates properly, who else could do it? Who else has the expertise? Who else advises governments on monetary policy? Who else prints money for governments? Who else keeps the system afloat when it’s taking on rough seas? We do.

Therefore I say to all of you gathered here today at the Bankers Banquet. We feed off the people and the people feed off us. Cheer up. Think positive and carry on as you have always been doing. The system cannot survive without our hands in the money system. The people are in our debt and that’s why I call it Libor-rating them.

Stephen J. Gray

July 22, 20012.

 Some interesting articles at link below:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2174785/HSBC-scandal-Britains-biggest-bank-let-drug-gangs-launder-millions--faces-640million-fine.html

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/the-federal-reserve-and-the-libor-scandal/

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/business/ex-bank-of-america-official-indicted-in-muni-bid-rigging.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18847180

http://news.yahoo.com/goldmans-blankfein-libor-scandal-undermines-financial-system-185353784--sector.html

http://maxkeiser.com/2012/07/18/ritholtz-a-concise-list-recent-bank-fraud/

Pro-Abortion Trade Unions and Their Unionized Media Brothers and Sisters

Pro-Abortion Trade Unions and Their Unionized Media Brothers and Sisters
By Stephen J. Gray

On May 29, 2012, The New Abortion Caravan Started off its cross Canada tour to show the horrors of abortion in Canada and “End The Killing” with a grisly display in downtown Vancouver at the Art Gallery. Canucks Anthem singer Mark Donnelly sang O Canada at the beginning. [1] One would have thought the “mainstream media” would have covered this story in a very busy downtown Vancouver. But very few did. Missing in action were the big unionized media, Global TV, CTV, and others. The Vancouver Sun and The Province the two biggest newspapers in Vancouver also failed to cover this story, as did the National Post, The Globe and Mail and the Toronto Star in Ontario. The CBC later on did a little coverage. Perhaps one should not be surprised at some of the media. The media have been covering up the abused, dismembered and bloody bodies of the aborted children for years; therefore, for them to show the truth of the atrocities would show them up as hypocrites. But hey, other newspapers across Canada are just as guilty of the censorship of abortions victims, and many of them parrot the pro-abortion mantra the same as the trade unions. Does “solidarity forever” remain the battle cry of the unions and their unionized brothers and sisters in the media on support for killing by “choice” on abortion? Are birds of a feather unionized together?

“…Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada. CEP is one of Canada's largest unions, representing just about every type of worker, from coast to coast to coast. We work at pulp and paper mills, telephone companies, in the oil, gas, chemical and mining industries. We are printers, journalists, radio and TV broadcasters, graphic artists, hotel workers, computer programmers, truck drivers, nurses - you name it, CEP members do it....” [2] (emphasis added)

“The Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, the country's largest media union with 25,000 members who work in print, radio, television, film, design and new media,…” [2a]

“The Canadian Media Guild is a democratic trade union representing 6,000 workers in the Canadian media. Our members work at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation/Société Radio-Canada (CBC/SRC), The Canadian Press, Reuters, Agence France-Presse (AFP), TVO, TFO, the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (aptn), ZoomerMedia, Shaw Media and CKOI Radio Gatineau (Québec). We also represent media freelancers.” [2b]

The supposed watchdog of a free society is a free press, yet many journalists in Canada are in trade unions which are financed by compulsory union dues. Misuse of union time and money has been epidemic across the country for many years. Where is the coverage on all of this by investigative journalists? Many journalists can show corporate connections and conflicts of interest down to the smallest detail, but they are strangely silent when it comes to probing union activities too deeply.

Some journalists were members of the Newspaper Guild 115, which later merged with the Communications, Energy and Paper Workers Union (CEP). The CEP union is one of many unions involving itself in the abortion issue, oops, I mean “right to choose.” A union boss of the CEP had this to say in a news release:

"CEP and many other unions have been at the forefront of the fight to ensure a woman has a right to choose and that governments don't turn back the clock on reproductive rights” -Dave Coles [3]

The Socialist Worker in an article headlined “Anti-choice caravan fails”
named some unions protesting against The New Abortion Caravan it stated: “Unions such as CAW, USW, OPSEU and CUPE were well represented at protests across the country….” [4]

Trade unions are certified for collective bargaining; this has evolved into collective coercion. The union bosses use their member time and money under the banner of trade unionism to support numerous issues unrelated to the workplace, including abortion and abortion clinics.

The B.C. Coalition for Abortion Clinics stated in its brochure that "the B.C. Federation of Labour and the Canadian Labour Congress, along with other labour organizations have long supported women’s right to choice on abortion, free-standing abortion clinics and medicare coverage for abortion."

The BC Federation of Labour (BCFL) is also on record as soliciting funds for abortion clinics. And Ken Georgetti, former President of the BCFL, and now President of the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), had this to say in a letter to union members on raising funds for an abortion clinic:

"in a short time, funds have been raised to pay the down payment on the $237,000 medical clinic." He goes on to say "the Executive Council urges all affiliates to send donations, consider loans or monthly pledges...."

Why are union members compelled to pay for this kind of leadership? Is it any wonder union dues keep increasing? The Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics (OCAC) has infiltrated the labour movement; it is stated in the book, “Social Movements, Social Change, The Politics and Practice of Organizing” (funded by our tax dollars) that "at various labour conventions in 1982 and 1983, OCAC activists were involved in garnering support for choice." The book also states that "many unions have contributed financial and material support to OCAC."

And OCAC which has received trade union money was organizing a protest along with the Canadian Auto Workers Union (CAW) against The New Abortion Caravan.

“The Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics (OCAC) and the CAW are organizing a peaceful demonstration to meet the anti-choice supporters as they arrive in Toronto.”[5]

The Ontario Federation of Labour has donated money to Canada’s foremost abortionist. In fact, it is stated in the book The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada by Michael Mandel, page 301, that "...the Ontario Federation of Labour has donated thousands of dollars to the Morgentaler defence. . ."

The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), at its 2008 convention, gave an award to Morgentaler, Canada’s foremost abortionist.

“Delegates applauded loudly, with many moved to tears, as Dr. Henry Morgentaler was introduced as the 2008 recipient of the CLC Award for Outstanding Service to Humanity” [6]

One wonders, how do union members feel about their dues paying for an award to an abortionist for “Outstanding Service to Humanity”?

Most unions in Canada are affiliated to the CLC and pay affiliation fees as they also do to local Labour Federations. Union members’ compulsory union dues and affiliation fees are supporting all kinds of groups and causes unrelated to the workplace. Union members have different beliefs on social, moral, political, and religious issues. Therefore, they should not be compelled into supporting matters unrelated to the workplace. Right now, they are in fact “indentured servants” as one big union boss--now retired--called them.

Many union members have been laid off, some have lost their homes, some are having a hard time paying rent and mortgages, yet the unions are spending time and money on abortion. Surely, this time and money would be better spent on union members? After all, it is their money. I believe it is time that this forced union dues business was shutdown and an inquiry held into the misuse of union time and money in Canada. Perhaps the big unionized media brothers and sisters of the trade unions could start doing some investigative journalism, or would that upset the union applecart and disrupt “solidarity forever?”

Stephen J. Gray
July 4,2012.

Endnotes:
[1]http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/blog/2012/05/31/immediate-release-abortion-advocates-shout-down-national-anthem-sung-mark-mr-o-canad

[2] http://www.cep591g.com/

[2a] http://www.cepmedia.ca/freelance/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=16&Itemid=113/

[2b] http://www.cmg.ca/en/about-us/

[3] http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/963379/no-question-pm-wants-to-re-open-abortion-debate


[4] http://socialistworkercanada.com/2012/06/30/anti-choice-caravan-fails/

[5] http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/pro-choice-counter-protest-anti-205100769.html

[6] http://www.canadianlabour.ca/convention/2008-convention"


More Info at links below:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/canucks-anthem-singer-mark-donnelly-sings-o-canada-192042820.html
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/as-new-abortion-caravan-heads-to-toronto-activist-vandalized-pro-life-truck/
http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/BC/ID/2242305354/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/story/2012/06/25/wdr-caw-enters-abortion-debate.html
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/06/04/bc-abortion-caravan-kelowna.html
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/372498/caw-abortion-open-letter.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZtzeKdQsOQ&feature=relmfu
http://www.newunionproject.ca/fourth-report-of-the-caw-cep-new-union-proposal-committee/
http://www.canadianlabour.ca/news-room/publications/womens-rights-are-not-debate-petition-m-312
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GtxrPFXu30
http://marxism2012.com/speakers/
http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/caravan
http://www.canadianlabour.ca/news-room/publications/womens-rights-are-not-debate-petition-m-312
http://www.openfile.ca/toronto/story/activists-clash-cross-country-abortion-caravan-hits-toronto
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/abortion-advocates-shout-down-national-anthem-and-vandalize-as-new-abortion
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/story/2012/06/26/wdr-caw-split-on-abortion.html
Funeral procession to 24 Sussex Drive
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.239646942821175.51548.136036533182217&type=1

Is there a “worldwide conspiracy” in the financial system?

Is there a “worldwide conspiracy” in the financial system?
By Stephen J, Gray

In the last number of days there have been numerous articles regarding, “The interest-rate rigging scandal…” This scandal affects just about everything people purchase or invest in. The Guardian U.K. newspaper of June 30, 2012 in an article by Jamie Doward stated:

“In a 28-page statement of facts relating to last week's revelation that Barclays had been fined a total of £290m, the US Department of Justice discloses how a network of traders working on both sides of the Atlantic conspired to influence both the Libor and Euribor interest rates – the rates at which banks lend to each other. It was, in effect, a worldwide conspiracy against the free functioning of the market....” [1]

“Let the marketplace decide,” is the constant slogan of the free marketers. One wonders will these same people advocate that those involved in this “worldwide conspiracy” be brought to justice after the banking “marketplace” rigged the system? Will any of these bankers get jailed? Will any of the finance ministers in the governments of the “nine government agencies” mentioned below be held to account?

“It is believed 16 banks in addition to Barclays are being investigated by the Department of Justice. Inquiries into alleged market manipulation are being carried out in the UK, the US, Japan, Canada, the European Union and Singapore and involve nine government agencies.” [2]

Who were these, “nine government agencies?” Were there politicians involved? Did any of the money printing Central Bankers know about this “global scam?” These are just a few of the many questions still unanswered. The banking fraternity are all connected to each other therefore it is hard not to believe that this “worldwide conspiracy” involves numerous important personages in the monetary system!

The independent U.K. newspaper of July 1, 2012 stated: “The IoS can also reveal that the Bank of England was aware of concerns over Libor five years ago, and discussed it in at least two meetings with representatives of some of the City's biggest financial institutions....Court documents filed in the US accuse Bank of England officials of failing to act on questions about "the integrity of Libor" raised during meetings of the Money Markets Liaison Group as early as 2007. The meeting was chaired by the BoE deputy governor, Paul Tucker, and attended by officials from institutions including at least seven that have since been named in Libor investigations....” [3]
…
“WHAT IS LIBOR?”
“It stands for the London interbank offer rate and is the interest banks charge to borrow from each other. Banks rely on this money to lend to customers and businesses. Its equivalent in Europe is called Euribor.”

“HOW DOES IT AFFECT ME?”
“The rate banks pay to raise money affects how much they charge on loans and mortgages. An increase in Libor can add hundreds of pounds to households’ annual mortgage repayments or a loan to a small business.”
“This was seen with dramatic effect in the run up to the financial crisis, when Libor soared and lenders raised their rates. It is also used as the benchmark for trillions of pounds in complex financial investments.”… [4] Daily Mail, July 1, 2012.

Trillions of taxpayers dollars were spent bailing out these pin striped suited bankers. Meanwhile, the ordinary person lost their homes, their jobs and their savings, their investments tanked. No bailouts for them but their taxes bailed out the bankers. What will it take before something is done to clean up this rotten, festering, fraudulent financial system? The perpetrators get away with fines; and who will pay their fines? The taxpayers will of course, in extra fees and charges courtesy of the monetary fraudsters running the system. The mafia are amateurs compared to these monetary manipulators. Justice has become a farce as witness none of the big perpetrators of the sub prime mortgage scandal has gone to jail. And none of the latest banking scam artists will either if the system runs true to form. Some of them have been known to advise governments, and so the corruption continues at the highest levels. The money changers are in charge and the taxpaying serfs are available to be looted, used and abused because that is how gangsters operate. Has organized crime become legitimate in the halls of power? Will the people continue to accept their debt and tax slavery to the manipulators of the financial system? Or will there be a day of reckoning?

Stephen J. Gray
July 2, 2012.


Endnotes:
[1]http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jun/30/banking-scandal-barclays-lawsuits-libor

[2] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/banks-face-lawsuits-worth-billions-over-libor-scam-7902918.html

[3] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-top-tories-dragged-into-banking-scandal-7901941.html

[4] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2167239/Bob-Diamond-refuses-quit-Barclays-chief-resignation-chairman-Libor-rate-fiddle.html

More info at links below:
http://www.salon.com/2012/07/02/bankers_constantly_lying_defrauding_most_still_not_in_jail/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/29/barclays-scandal-not-inappropriate-crime
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/news/article-2166863/Barclays-did-act-despite-THREE-warnings-Libor.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/markets/article-2166937/Scandal-Barclays-rigging-key-rates-lead-criminal-charges.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-28/banker-to-the-bankers-knows-the-numbers-are-lying.html
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article35394.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-street-learned-from-the-mafia-20120620#ixzz1ySCEgqjl

Did I see a hypocrite on Canada Day?

Did I see a hypocrite on Canada Day?
By Stephen J. Gray


Did I see a hypocrite on Canada Day?
Was he wrapping himself in our flag after preparing to sign our sovereignty away?
His sycophantic followers praised his treacherous dealings
Too stupid or scared to show their real feelings

Blind allegiance was the forte of this political choir
They bent and grovelled to his every desire
Is our great country being signed away in secret?
Are transnational corporations going to benefit?

To hell with the people seems to be the direction of the planners
As they raise their multiple “free trade” banners
Will parliament be laughed at and perhaps ignored?
As our resident hypocrite courts the corporate boards

For make no mistake once sovereignty is lost
It would be at an enormous cost
Europe is but one example where deals were signed
Will traitors rule for their own kind?

Are we going to consent to secret deals?
And let one man do as he feels
Or are we going to strenuously object?
And tell this guy we are not his subjects

If we care about our country
We must demand an end to this effrontery
This guy has to be firmly controlled and told
That we the people don’t want our country betrayed and sold

Stephen J. Gray
July 1,2012.

Some articles of interest at link below:
http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Tories+pitch+free+trade+deal+online/6533402/story.html
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/11736-tpp-secret-trade-agreement-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONZFzbQcUmU
http://ca.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/shvc123/t903473.htm
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10813075
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/advocates+want+veil+trade+talks+lifted/6853073/story.html

Austerity and other plans…

Austerity and other plans…
By Stephen J. Gray

The austerity message is that to save the system
Everybody, everywhere really must listen
The unelected Central Bankers and their puppet politicians
Will tell everyone they have made a decision

The people must learn to do with less
That is their solution to clean up their mess
More austerity, more taxes for the taxpaying masses
And total obedience to these “leadership” asses

They tell us the “market” will save us eventually
Though it might be in the next century
So forget all your retirement plans and expected pensions
And if you object you could be in detention

The system is run by and for, a select few
Now they are openly telling us what to do
Produce and produce and “free trade” is in store
Our old age security will soon be no more

A “partnership” will be signed, with a number of countries: but the contents are secret
Parliaments are bypassed and democracy is forfeited
Political despots love having power to rule
And the people are lied to by these undemocratic fools

Selling out sovereignty is the name of the game
These devious bandits would put the devil to shame
Treasonous behaviour is out in the open
And objecting to their agenda is definitely verboten

Did you notice there is plenty of money for wars and weapons?
There is no austerity for the warmongers “blessings”
These destroyers of lives and human habitation
Are surely a curse upon every nation?

Go fight your own bloody evil wars
You parasites of finance and war mongering whores
Come out of your bunkers and palatial estates
And do some service for the human race

Repatriate your fortunes from your offshore tax havens
Show some patriotism instead of being craven
You have had it too good for so very long
We’re tired of listening to your austerity song

The people of Greece have taught us a lesson
That to obey your austerity dictums is to lose our possessions
Are the people getting ready to refuse all the proclamations?
Have the people had enough of the B.S. in all the nations?

They know who is causing all the pain and suffering
Financial gangsters and their devious workings
Now some are advising the puppet politicians
And so the farce continues with their plans and austerity missions

Stephen J. Gray
June 24, 2012.

Some articles of interest at links below:

http://www.plata.com.mx/mplata/articulos/articlesFilt.asp?fiidarticulo=191
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-scam-wall-street-learned-from-the-mafia-20120620#ixzz1ySCEgqjl
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-01/goldman-too-big-to-face-prosecution-over-mortgage-securities-hintz-says.html
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/11736-tpp-secret-trade-agreement-puts-international-tribunal-above-us-
http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcatart=2&lang=1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2011/jan/08/jersey-tax-haven-nicholas-shaxson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasure_Islands:_Tax_Havens_and_the_Men_who_Stole_the_World
http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/perkins1.1.1.html

The Money Printers and Their Puppets

The Money Printers and Their Puppets
By Stephen J. Gray

They print money for their banker friends
These are the central bankers who to governments lend
Puppet politicians pay them homage
Some of them have an austerity message

They can create money out of thin air
These are the money printers that have no care
The people will pay for all their bills
Taxed to the max for these moneyed shills

Should some of these money changers be in jail?
“No” say some: They are “too big to fail”
Instead they advise the political dumbbells
Making sure the austerity message sells and sells

The people must learn to lower their expectations
Is the communication given too many nations
Meanwhile the evil financiers of war and gore
Build up their tax free profits safely offshore

The taxpayers everywhere pay more; and plenty
While the bankers’ puppets are the Gang of 20
A multi-nation politburo in expensive attire
Are they useless entities? Could some be liars?

Lined up and waving for their group photograph
Taxpayers are forced to pay for this gang of the daft
Then they will issue a statement fashioned to fit
A self serving message of political bullsh-t

Oh here comes a “right honourable” one!
Did you vote for that son of a gun?
Did you see, “His Excellency” appear?
Yes, he was at the expensive dinner my dear

They feed our “leaders” well at these meetings
And the taxpayers pay for all their grovelling greetings
Aren’t we lucky to have money printers and their puppets?
Perhaps they will make a movie of this gang of muppets

This is the “world stage” and the cameras are rolling
The gangs all here and the bells are tolling
The people are prisoners of this Gang of 20
And make no mistake it will cost the people plenty

Austerity and more austerity is the solution for the masses
While the money printers and politicians get free passes
But the role of the people is to be tax paying serfs
The money printers and their puppets rule the earth.

Stephen J. Gray
June 19, 2012.

The Obituary of Democracy

The Obituary of Democracy
By Stephen J. Gray



Democracy is dead buried by the “Great Leader” and his political sycophants. Its funeral service was held in a House of No Shame. The funeral service lasted throughout the night. There were many speakers at the service. Cheering and applauding its death were the majority “family” of the House. The last rites were performed and the funeral procession trooped out of the House, proud of their role. No tears were shed, for this was a callous and indifferent gathering of hypocrites who lacked the courage to speak out and try to save democracy. Those who had at one time preached “accountability” were now unaccountable to the real owners of the House the people who paid for its upkeep. The people who paid for this House of No Shame would pay all the expenses for the death of democracy.



The killers of democracy were subservient and did as they were told. Some of them could have saved democracy but were afraid. The wrath of the “Great Leader” kept them in perpetual fear. One of them had attempted to speak out but succumbed to fear and helplessness. There were those who called him a coward, if that was true then he was a coward in a collection of cowards. For cowards do not like democracy, nor do they like people who have principles.



Principles go hand in hand with courage and courage was lacking in those that killed democracy. It was said that some of the followers did not like what was being done to democracy, but they lacked the courage to oppose the “Great Leader.” Pictures were seen of him, who brooks no dissent, receiving a standing ovation from his grovelling gang. Smiles and handshakes were part of the celebration of this blatant crime against democracy.



It was a nauseating performance that will be remembered for its sickening spectacle of a group in the throes of abject admiration for a leader lacking in principles or moral decency. A leader who had contempt for democracy and who showed his true colors, now out in the open, because he believed he was invincible. But, perhaps he would do well to remember that old saying: “Pride comes before a fall.”



This then is how democracy died. Ridiculed, laughed at, scorned and abused. If you care about democracy, tell others how it died and who was responsible and perhaps someday truth and justice will prevail and democracy’s honour will be restored.

Stephen J. Gray
June 18, 2012.

Did Canadians Vote for ‘Global Governance?’

Did Canadians Vote for ‘Global Governance?’

By Stephen J. Gray

“We need some semblance of global governance” Stephen Harper [1]

When did Canadians agree to ‘global governance?’ Was it on the ballot in the last election? Is Stephen Harper, who was running around electioneering during the last election - sometimes wearing a jacket with Canada emblazoned all over it – really hiding his true intentions and globalist leanings?  Was he just seeking votes? Does he have a hidden agenda to give away Canada’s national sovereignty?  Is he being influenced by powerful people or by people in other countries who are also undermining their own countries sovereignty? (Europe is one example where puppet politicians have signed away national sovereignty and unelected “technocrats” have taken over) Surely, if Mr. Harper cared about Canada and Canadians he would not have said the words below?

“I know some people don’t like it, it’s a loss of national sovereignty” Stephen Harper [1]

How do the people in his party feel about the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Do they care? Or do they follow Mr. Harper blindly? Are the speech writers and political flacks who surround Mr. Harper are they okay with the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Does the perks of the job mean more than loyalty to ones country? Do the MPs who serve under Mr. Harper and the opposition MPs have any thoughts on Canada’s ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Do these MPs care about Canada’s ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Have any of them spoken out in defence of Canada?

What about the Canadian media? Have any of them raised the alarm on the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Has it been front page news in any of the corporate owned newspapers? Have any of the corporate owned TV stations who are always boasting that they bring the news to the people: Have any of them done an in depth investigation of the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ What about the big business elites, do they care about the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Does money and profits count more than allegiance to Canada? I guess that question could be easily answered, when we see corporate chief executives investing in China, a country where slave labour has been used and dissidents are tortured and a one child policy and forced abortion are rampant. Still, never mind all that, PM Stephen Harper is forming a “strategic partnership” with the Chinese dictatorship. I wonder could that be called a ‘loss of national sovereignty?’

“Harper also vowed joint efforts with China to address global and regional issues, to safeguard world peace and to boost new progress of global economic governance.” [2]

And of course globalist inclined, Mr. Harper, is hell bent on a “free trade” agreement with the European Union (EU).  National sovereignty in the E.U., as I mentioned earlier has been handed over to unelected “Technocrats” and some countries were taken into the E.U. without the consent of their people. I guess one could also call this a ‘loss of national sovereignty.’ What is really going on? Are we being treated as tax paying slaves, expected to conform to whatever Mr. Harper dictates? Are we expected to sit back and accept the dictum of Mr. Harper: “I know some people don’t like it, it’s a loss of national sovereignty” Or are we going to demand that our country is not for sale by any politician with ‘global governance’ on their agenda?

Stephen J. Gray

June 13, 2012.

 Endnotes:

[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONZFzbQcUmU

[2] http://ca.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/shvc123/t903473.htm

Definitions of global and governance:

Global:  “covering, influencing, or relating to the whole world”[3]

Governance: “government, control, or authority” [4]

[3] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/global

[4] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/governance

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some articles of interest at links below:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Tories+pitch+free+trade+deal+online/6533402/story.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/02/consorting-with-communists.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2010/06/are-we-being-ruled-by-travelling.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/05/are-politicians-signing-away-national.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/03/internet-under-attack.html

http://graysinfo.blogspot.ca/2012/02/coincidence-or-planned-political.html

The Bootlickers Report

The Bootlickers Report

(Satire) By Stephen J. Gray

Dear Friends,

This report is for those of you who may have missed the latest news on the happenings concerning our Great and Supreme Leader. He had a wonderful visit with the Queen in jolly old England courtesy of the peoples’ tax dollars. There is no truth to the silly rumor that he wants to be addressed as His Highness when he gets back from his journeys. He then proceeded to France to meet with the Socialist President. He sounded off in the media about the Greek elections and the future of the global economy and had a message for European leaders and urged them to act ‘decisively.’ Our supreme leader knows what is best for democracy everywhere and does not hesitate to spread his knowledge.

In other news a motion on abortion was in the news here at home.  It is possible our great and supreme leader could be angry over this and may vent his anger when he gets back. I suggest all office chairs be removed from offices. We do not want anybody being injured should some chairs be thrown around, just kidding of course. Still, dissent has mostly been silenced and most of the boys and girls of the party know their place in the scheme of things. Don’t speak until told to do so.

Thank goodness we have Gordy the whip-master to handle some of these miscreants who have the temerity to bring motions before parliament that the Supreme Leader does not like. We also have backup, as the Supreme Leader’s “pit bull” is always available to bark and snarl on cue. He is chewing on a bone at the moment and feeling quite content. Though a bone of contention, (is that a pun or what?) with some democracy proponents is the fact the “pit bull” called communist China a friend an ally. But hey, he is minister of foreign affairs and knows his stuff. Still, I think he missed the supreme leader while he was over in Europe.

Meanwhile, there are some complaints about the Omnibus Bill being rushed through parliament. Some noisy people are questioning its content and want it broken up into separate pieces, so that all these different issues can be debated separately. They call this democracy. Can you believe these people?  Don’t they understand democracy is whatever the supreme leader says it is and he surely knows?  There are also some complaints about employment insurance changes. Some people don’t want to move to look for a job. Well, isn’t that too bad!  Times are changing and we all must change with the times. No dissent will be allowed now that we are running the show. Another complaint from enemies of the party was the thousands of taxpayers dollars spent on limousines in Davos.  Hey, when you are in power you have to move in style, and Davos is style, that’s where the supreme leader announced changes to Old Age Security to a meeting of billionaires. Still, some unhappy campers think he should have announced this in Parliament first. But, these are just the usual losers who whine about democracy.

Our great democratic leader learned a lot from his recent trip to China, they have a migrant workforce that follows the work and do as they are told. We are going to have a “strategic partnership” with China. The old ways of doing things are gone. Now capitalism and communism are birds of a feather, as the saying goes. Anyway we are getting two pandas on loan to seal the deal, though some cynical people are saying: “We are in bed with the Reds.” They just don’t understand how partnerships’ and free trade work.

Talking about free trade the Supreme Leader is signing free trade deals at a pace unrivalled anywhere. His pen is on fire, inking all these deals. Still, some of the usual suspects are saying all this should be debated in parliament. Yes, I know he trumpeted accountability. But hey, that was to get the suckers, oops I mean people to vote for him. Still, they don’t get it the supreme leader does not need parliament now that he has a majority. Others are saying he is signing national sovereignty away. Sure, he is. He is on record as admitting to that. When you have power, you can do anything and anything is possible from our Supreme Leader. I’ll close for now as my limousine is waiting.

Sincerely Yours.

A.  Bootlicker.

Stephen J. Gray

June 8, 2012.

graysinfo@gmail.com    http://graysinfo.blogspot.com